The Cincinnati Federation of Teachers (CFT) filed a counterclaim asking a judge to rule that parts of a 2002 agreement between Cincinnati Public Schools and a local anti-tax group violate teachers' free speech rights. The agreement broadly prohibits communication on district property for campaign purposes. The anti-tax group, COAST, has sued the district twice for violating that agreement. The CFT counterclaim argues that teachers have a constitutional right to support school levies, especially since a state law change, and that their use of email did not violate the agreement. COAST argues the teachers' actions were illegal and used tax dollars for campaigning. The CFT says the teachers acted independently, not at the direction of the district, and that
Executive Board Local 1302, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 477 F.2d 612, 2d Cir. (1973)
Reforming Mining Law: A Look at Transnational Corporations’ Activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo Within the Doctrine of Corporate Social Responsibility
The Cincinnati Federation of Teachers (CFT) filed a counterclaim asking a judge to rule that parts of a 2002 agreement between Cincinnati Public Schools and a local anti-tax group violate teachers' free speech rights. The agreement broadly prohibits communication on district property for campaign purposes. The anti-tax group, COAST, has sued the district twice for violating that agreement. The CFT counterclaim argues that teachers have a constitutional right to support school levies, especially since a state law change, and that their use of email did not violate the agreement. COAST argues the teachers' actions were illegal and used tax dollars for campaigning. The CFT says the teachers acted independently, not at the direction of the district, and that
Original Description:
Original Title
Teachers Union Seeks Right to Campaign Using School Resources
The Cincinnati Federation of Teachers (CFT) filed a counterclaim asking a judge to rule that parts of a 2002 agreement between Cincinnati Public Schools and a local anti-tax group violate teachers' free speech rights. The agreement broadly prohibits communication on district property for campaign purposes. The anti-tax group, COAST, has sued the district twice for violating that agreement. The CFT counterclaim argues that teachers have a constitutional right to support school levies, especially since a state law change, and that their use of email did not violate the agreement. COAST argues the teachers' actions were illegal and used tax dollars for campaigning. The CFT says the teachers acted independently, not at the direction of the district, and that
The Cincinnati Federation of Teachers (CFT) filed a counterclaim asking a judge to rule that parts of a 2002 agreement between Cincinnati Public Schools and a local anti-tax group violate teachers' free speech rights. The agreement broadly prohibits communication on district property for campaign purposes. The anti-tax group, COAST, has sued the district twice for violating that agreement. The CFT counterclaim argues that teachers have a constitutional right to support school levies, especially since a state law change, and that their use of email did not violate the agreement. COAST argues the teachers' actions were illegal and used tax dollars for campaigning. The CFT says the teachers acted independently, not at the direction of the district, and that
. . . - say it's OK, too. to 'use property or personnel grounds. " i Itsaysemails don't violate agreement, The Cincinnati: Federation' fc;>rcampaigI}.purposes. The agreement broadly prQ- of Teachers filed ai motion last The eFT, in aCQunterelaim communi- week in Hamilton County Com- filed Nov. 21, asks the jIiifae to ' cation on distriet property. ' By Jessica Brown jlbroW!1@enquirer.com monPl,eas Court askingaj1.J.dge rule that portions of tbe OOJ\ST COAST has sued the district' to exempt it from 812002 agree... agreement, violate . twice tor Violating that agree- ment Pub- First rights and ' ment It receiVed $16;000 in a , The Cincinnati teachers 'lie Schools and alqc81 BntHax sijould be voided." ' , "" 2()10 settlement. In the current union says it's OJ(: for teachers group, the Coalition to case" COAST and its; , J ... :Pany time to'discuss aptrtax: ,(CJAST). ,",' i ; ,',','.: ,I' "COASTsued trictfort&' ' " the, district because teachers. ,,"',',' . ," .. " ' ,; WS now aslcing a judge to, natl]?ublic ',,:1tS ';:", $ .. -JON; Page B3 I . ".;\ .'.;, i' . .( ",' . . J _--, _________ --,---:--__ -;--_________ ........ __ e ........ _____ ...... .. Union said COAST attorney Chris Finney. "COAST has decided to make 'this a Continued from Page B1 core of our strategy. And We've been success- used the company email ful:' system to discuss voter '. But 10m Mooney, who registration and rallies in advance of a Nov. 6 CPS Federation of Teachers, tax renewal. says the teachers were "It's wrong, and it's ille- acting 'on their own, not gal. It's illegal to cam- under the direction of the paignwithourtaxdollars, ,.school:diitrict. The 2002 they' ' vent them from using email to discuss, ,a cam- paign, 'according to his counterclaim. The countertlaim also notes teachers have the right under the Ohio Con- stitution, Ohio law and their collective bargain- ing agreement to 'support school leViesl especially since the passage of the
''We're there to say there is no violation of the (COAST)' agreement," said Mooney. "We're there , to stand up for the rights of CFTand their mem- bers to eXpress their,First Amendment right." "I think there is a dif- {erent of the 2002 agreement, said Mooney. ''1 think' :=----:----------=-::---:=--:::---------- never intended to go." Finney disagreed. ''What they're saying" is that means the have the right to campaign using public propeny," he said. "It's posi- tion they're
Executive Board Local 1302, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 477 F.2d 612, 2d Cir. (1973)
Reforming Mining Law: A Look at Transnational Corporations’ Activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo Within the Doctrine of Corporate Social Responsibility