Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infra-Guard! A Private FBI? Warns of Obamas Ineligibility
Infra-Guard! A Private FBI? Warns of Obamas Ineligibility
I
DON'T KNOW ABOUT THEM OR WHAT THEY DO....WHO ARE THEY WARNING OF WHAT....A PRIVATE
FBI?? HUH?? THEY ARE IN ALL FUSION CENTER OPERATIONS!! CHECK MAIC...IT SEEMS THEY
ARE WARNING THE BOSS (WHOEVER THAT IS) OF A DANGER OF HIS UNDERLING OBAMA BEING
DEPRESIDENTIZED AND THE PROBLEMS THAT MAY CAUSE....
</i></b>
Lyle J. Rapacki, PHD, FBI InfraGard, March 16, 2009, White Paper Discussion, Dr.
Orly Taitz, Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, Barack Obama not eligible, US
Attorney General, US Army Officer, constitutional crisis, civil unrest
March 25, 2009 · 551 Comments
<a href="http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/lyle-j-rapacki-phd-fbi-
infragard-march-16-2009-white-paper-discussion-dr-orly-taitz-supreme-court-
justice-john-roberts-barack-obama-not-eligible-us-attorney-general-us-army-
officer-consti/">http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/lyle-j-rapacki-phd-
fbi-infragard-march-16-2009-white-paper-discussion-dr-orly-taitz-supreme-court-
justice-john-roberts-barack-obama-not-eligible-us-attorney-general-us-army-
officer-consti/</a>
The below report states: “if Mr Obama fights unsealing his documentation…there
will be civil unrest unleashed on the streets”
InfraGrad has a Public Private Partnership with the FBI. The PPP programs has been
leveraged heavily from local to international levels to render entities back into
Panopolies. The term panopoly was coined by Joseph Borkin, chief economic advisor
of the Anti-trust Division of the Department of Justice circa 1943, during his
investigations of I.G. Farben because the aggregation of businesses were much
larger than a monopoly or cartel.
_______
Diplomate: Reply:
Statement of Purpose:
The content of this White Paper is deliberately intended to stimulate thought and
discussion. Informational analysis comprising global security, national security
of the United States of America, socio-political-economic forces as a dimension to
national security, culture, freedom in human rights, defense and the rule of law
are considered within the framework of this treatise.
Overview:
to the Chief Justice warns: “If MR. OBAMA is not constitutionally eligible to
serve as President of the United States, then no act that he takes is, arguably,
valid, the laws that he signs would not be valid, the protective orders that he
signs would be null and void, and every act that he takes would be subject to
legal challenge, both in the Courts of the United States of America, and in
International Courts, and that, therefore, it is important for the voters to know
whether he, or any candidate for President in the future, is eligible to serve in
that office.”
Just prior to this meeting, attorney Taitz sent Certified Correspondence on
February 27th to the U.S. Attorney General, the Director of the FBI, Congressional
and Senatorial Judiciary Committee, et.al. with the stated purpose “demand for
investigation and immediate action in regards suspected crimes” identified as, but
not limited to: impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation of
character, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the
computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, forgery, using
cyberspace for voter fraud. Military officers from all branches of the U.S. Armed
Forces have joined in this action as Plaintiffs. Among the petitioners are: Maj.
Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr. David Earl-Graef; police officer and Selected
Reservist Navy Commander Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, U.S. Army now
serving on active duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. Timothy Comerford; Tenn.
State Rep. Frank Nicely and others.
One of the “and others” is Harry Riley, a veteran who spent a significant time
serving in the Pentagon. This former officer said the issue is basically over
whether Americans will allow “the trashing” of their Constitution. “Myself, along
with hundreds of thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S.
Constitution. The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis. How can an
individual become the Commander-in-Chief, or the president of the U.S., with
questions regarding his constitutional qualifications?”
The complaint filed with the U.S. Attorney General (now in the hands of the Chief
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) requests “relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein
Obama II to test his title to president before the Supreme Court.” This legal
phrase essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama
is using to act as president. This is the only judicial remedy for violations of
the Constitution by public officials and agents. This legal right established in
British common law 800 years ago and was recognized by the U.S. Founding Fathers
to demand documentation that may prove – or disprove – Barack Obama’s eligibility
to be president.
What follows is the Summary of the complaint filed by Orly Taitz, attorney in
Mission Viejo, California. As you can imagine, the complaint is thorough and long.
I have replicated sufficient
passages so not to diminish the nature, spirit, scope or details of the complaint
but conscious of time to read and length, I compiled the salient points in this
complaint to save you from reading the 78 page document. I will further attest
that Exhibits and articles of proof were also attached to the documents I
reviewed. I will further attest the investigator working this case for attorney
Taitz is a licensed Private Investigator in the State of California for the past
twenty-five years, and prior to this, served twenty years as a Detective at New
Scotland Yard. I will further attest that I have reviewed documents containing
additional names not previously mentioned. Some of the names are active military
and others are retired at Lt. Col. and above rank.
Summary of the Complaint submitted to U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.:
“Recently an active U.S. Army Officer, who is risking his life in defending our
country in Iraq, joined my (attorney Taitz) legal action aimed at unsealing Barack
Hussein Obama’s, aka Barry Soetoro’s, (Obama/Soetoro) legal status and
eligibility/legitimacy for presidency of the U.S. The president needs to be a
‘natural born citizen – one who is born in the country to parents (plural, both)
who are citizens of this country.
This definition was recently unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate in Senate
resolution 511, presented by Senator Leahy in April 2008, as Senator McCain sought
his legitimacy for the presidency to be verified, and Mr. McCain therefore
presented his long version original birth certificate.
Mr. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen; he was a citizen of Kenya here in the
U.S. on a student visa, which by itself made Obama/Soetoro ineligible for
presidency, regardless of whether he was born in this country or Kenya, or whether
he later lost his U.S. citizenship while immigrating to Indonesia and obtaining
Indonesian citizenship (by being adopted and naturalized), and later reaffirming
his Indonesian citizenship while traveling on a Indonesian passport as an adult,
and also most likely obtaining taxpayer funded financial aid as a Foreign Exchange
student from Indonesia (Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and any U.S.
citizenship would therefore have to be relinquished). Additionally,
Obama/Soetoro’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, and the Ambassador from Kenya,
Peter Ogego, made statements that he was born in Kenya, and there is no record of
him being born in any hospital in Hawaii. HI Statute #338 allows foreign born
children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth
(COLB), and those can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only.
Additionally, Forensic Document expert Sandra Line has issued an affidavit that
Obama’s place of birth cannot be ascertained without reviewing the original birth
certificate. Dr. Chiymoi Fukimo, director of Health Department for the State of
Hawaii, issued a statement that Obama has a birth certificate on file, but
intentionally refused to provide clarification, whether it is a birth certificate
for a foreign born child of a Hawaiian resident, whether it was prepared based on
hospital records or statement of one relative only, or whether it is an amended
birth certificate, created upon Obama/Soetoro’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro, his
Indonesian stepfather, and showing him a citizen of Indonesia.
There are forensic questions raised about the short version Certification of Life
Birth posted by Obama/Soetoro on his web site; lacking corroborating evidence such
as name of the hospital, name of the doctor, three signatures and a seal on the
front of the document.
contributions that are unaccounted for. Which is it? What social security numbers
were used?
As you stated in your speech on Martin Luther King Day, Americans should not be
‘cowards’, particularly when matters of race are concerned. I was not a coward and
prepared this large dossier, so I hope you will not be a coward and instead order
an expeditious completion of this investigation and its subsequent prosecution.”
Conclusion:
The action handed to the Chief Justice is on behalf 120 military officers, many of
high rank, and 9 state representatives. Purportedly the room was stunned and
silent as attorney Taitz and Chief Justice Roberts engaged in an extremely brief
exchange regarding these charges which led to the oral promise made by the Chief
Justice to review them.
( END OF REPORT )
Read more:
http://defendourfreedoms.org