THE 2004 ELECTIONS

1
 PURPOSE

• To share the TRUT H

• To put a CLOSURE on
the issues
discussed

2
 AGENDA

• Following the Vote from Precinct

to Proclamation of Winner

3. Fabrication of Election Results

• Before Elections
• After Elections

• Frustration of the People’s Will

6. Filipinos’ Role in Putting a Closure

to these Issues
3
2004 Election Analysis

4
 Precinct Following the vote
City / Municipality

BY PRECINCT

Province

BY MUNICIPALITY

Legend:
Congress
ERs – Election Returns
SOV – Statement of Votes
COC – Certificate of Canvass
5
Irregularities
and Anomalies

6
Page number is printed but
serial number is stamped.

Both numbers should be printed at the

same time.
Serial numbers can be copied using
numbering machines easily obtained from
bookstores. This highly irregular practice
would render the ER not accountable.
NOTE:
• The Election Returns (ER) is the election
document closest to the ballot, not the
Certificate of Canvass (COC).
• The ER contains the “tara” which
corresponds to every vote read in full view
of the voting public.
• The ER, therefore, reflects the true results
of the voting.

9
 Page 1
Page 2
Page 3

of the Provincial
Certificate of
Canvass (COC) of
Agusan del Norte
Page 2 and Page 3 have
serial and page
numbers with uniform
gaps.
Page 1 is different.
Note how the serial number of
Page 1 does not align with the
other pages.
Page 1 shows the list
of candidates for
President and Vice-
President.

The operators switch

the altered COC page 1
to change the results.
 This practice of stamping serial
numbers was corrected for the 2001
elections. In 2004, it was back.
In the ERs, the tally of votes for each
candidate is closed by the signing
of names, and affixing of right
thumb marks by all three Board of
Election Inspectors.
This ER is considered “naked,” that
is, there is no closure of entries as
required by law.
This ER from Floridablanca,
Pampanga is an example of
improper closure of tallies.
Imprints are neither thumb
marks nor human marks.
Floridablanca

Are these human

thumbmarks?
 Floridablanca
San Juan

Compared to this
ER from San Juan,
can you spot the
differences?
 Floridablanc
a

Next, observe the “taras.”

Note how orderly the “taras” were written.
This can be done in the comfort of an air-
conditioned room.
But not at midnight, inside a hot and crowded
precinct, by tired and sleepy teachers.
 Floridablanc
a

Even more incredible, on the same day in Las Pinas,

about 80 kilometers away, we see “taras” written in
the same penmanship of the person in Floridablanca,
Pampanga!
 The Color of the “Pianistas”

Comelec Resolution 6667 requires that each precinct be supplied

with two strips of thumbmark takers. The color of the ink on the
strips is grayish black.
 Irregularities shown in
previous charts bolster
suspicions of fabricating and
padding election results to
favor GMA.

23
How was these done:

1. Identify the provinces where Mrs.Arroyo

rated well in surveys in order to make
substantial vote padding in these areas
appear credible.
Pulse Asia in November 2003 shows:

• GMA received 39% support in the Visayas, and 15%,

her lowest, in Metro Manila.

• Before the entry of FPJ in the presidential race, GMA

registered highest support from the poorest E class
with 29%. From ABC class, she got the lowest, 20%.
SWS Survey from September 2003 to
March 2004 shows:

• GMA received +44% satisfactory rating in the

Visayas, and 11%, her lowest, in Metro Manila.
Four provinces were identified: Pampanga,
Cebu, Iloilo and Bohol (PCIB Area).

Iloilo
Pampanga Cebu

Bohol
 2. Inflate the number of expected registered
voters from 38.8M to 43.5M to conceal vote
padding.
Total Registered
Year Population Voters % Increase / Decrease
1992 65,338,989 32,141,079 49% (1989)
+ 4,203,024
1995 68,616,536 36,415,154 53% + 4,274,075
1998 73,130,985 34,136,193 47% - 2,978,961
2001 77,898,184 36,611,363 47% + 2,475,170
2004
Expected Registered 81,357,479 38,807,518 48% + 2,196,155
Voters
In the Project of
81,357,479 43,536,028 54% + 6,924,665
Precincts

Voter addition facilitates vote padding.

In Pampanga, the expected number of
registered voters for 2004 was 944,092.
But in the PCoC, the number of registered
voters was padded to total 1,080,751.

Dagdag
Plus
136,659
In the Province of Cebu, the expected number
of registered voters for 2004 was 1,299,612.

But in the PCoC, the number of registered

voters was padded to total 1,780,708.

Addition / Dagdag
481,096
In Cebu City, the expected number of
registered voters for 2004 was 377,637.
But in the CCoC, the number of registered
voters was padded to total 464,802.

Dagdag Plus
87,165
In Iloilo, the expected number of
registered voters for 2004 was 787,580.
But in the PCoC, the number of registered
voters was padded to total 923,262.

Dagdag Plus
135,682
In Iloilo City, the expected number of
registered voters for 2004 was 191,620.
But in the PCoC, the number of registered
voters was padded to total 240,153.

Dagdag Plus
48,533
In Bohol, the expected number of
registered voters for 2004 was 556,579.
But in the PCoC, the number of registered
voters was padded to total 619,139.

Dagdag
Plus
62,560
Thus, in Pampanga, Cebu, Iloilo and
Bohol, there was an increase of
951,695 registered voters.

951,695

Roughly the same number as the votes

added to GMA.
3. Over-print election result documents
• Election Returns (ER) for the precinct tallies
• Statements of Votes (SoV) for the precinct and
municipal breakdowns
• Certificates of Canvass (CoC) for the municipal, city
and provincial totals

to contain altered results and to

substitute for documents with
the genuine results.
Several months before elections,
Commissioner Resureccion Borra
admitted that the Comelec had over-
printed election forms:
• 3 million ballots
• 33,000 election returns.
4. Pre-compute, in a separate operation, the
desired vote totals per precinct and record
in a tally master list. This list is used as a
guide to tally the altered votes on the
over-printed ERs.

5. “Certify” the false ERs, after the votes are

tallied, using the master list of Board of
Election Inspectors.
The master list of election inspectors
contains their names, precinct
assignments and specimen signatures.

This list is used by master forgers as a

guide for the ER certification.
6. Send the fabricated ERs, reflecting
landslides for GMA, to election officers
and local operatives who had been
instructed to switch the real precinct
results with the false returns.
 VOTE RATIOS
TOTAL GMA LEAD OVER VOTE
LOCATION VOTES VOTE % FPJ RATIO
CEBU CITY
CEBU 327,672 220,060 67% 161,469 3.8 x
PROV 1,208,810 965,630 80% 842,631 7.8 x
PAMPANGA 799,265 642,712 80% 557,992 7.6 x
ILOILO 700,582 512,812 73% 430,568 6.2 x
BOHOL 495,717 337,336 68% 242,956 3.6 x

TOTAL LEAD OVER VOTE

LOCATION VOTES FPJ VOTE % GMA RATIO
NUEVA
ECIJA 782,490 476,220 61% 315,782 3.0 x
LAGUNA 950,623 477,630 50% 282,290 2.5 x
BULACAN 1,049,207 505,164 48% 268,084 2.1 x
 Municipality GMA Votes FPJ Votes
GMA Lead Boljoon 5,142 484 11 x
Over FPJ Dalaguete 20,463 1,927 11 x
Catmon 10,270 459 22 x Aloguinsa 9,251 891 10 x
Alegria 8,629 406 21 x Daanbantayan 19,813 2,084 10 x
Bogo 27,134 1,523 18 x Toledo City 47,318 5,114 9x
Bantayan 23,635 1,332 18 x Minglanilla 28,976 3,156 9x
Poro 9,297 543 17 x Danao City 44,720 5,002 9x
Tabuelan 8,309 489 17 x Alcoy 4,781 542 9x
Sogod 11,820 705 17 x Carmen 15,639 1,782 9x
Tabogon 13,272 849 16 x Badian 11,870 1,359 9x
Argao 26,522 1,776 15 x Liloan 25,258 2,952 9x
Moalboal 10,534 709 15 x Carcar 31,974 3,870 8x
Asturias 15,264 1,051 15 x Naga 28,641 3,532 8x
San Remegio 18,231 1,273 14 x San Fernando 19,176 2,373 8x
Oslob 8,424 610 14 x Sibonga 13,751 1,764 8x
Malabuyoc 6,560 484 14 x Compostela 12,906 1,732 7x
Medellin 15,610 1,203 13 x Barili 21,153 2,877 7x
Pilar 5,426 423 13 x Madridejos 8,505 1,398 6x
Dumanjug 15,527 1,217 13 x Mandaue City 83,064 14,631 6x
Borbon 10,846 866 13 x Consolacion 25,787 4,659 6x
Ginatilan 5,782 472 12 x Tudela 3,912 744 5x
Balamban 22,510 1,856 12 x Talisay 45,422 8,793 5x
Ronda 7,271 601 12 x Lapu-lapu City 73,030 18,365 4x
Pinamungahan 19,096 1,590 12 x Santa Fe 5,957 1,540 4x
Tuburan 18,701 1,572 12 x San Francisco 11,903 3,177 4x
Alcantara 5,408 472 11 x Santander 4,877 1,642 3x
Samboan 8,511 788 11 x Cordova 9,692 3,440 3x

TOTAL 965,570 123,099 7.84 42

People are asking:

If GMA was leading the race,

why did she have to call Garci?
 Because the unexpected
happened.

• The fabricated votes in GMA’s bailiwicks

were not enough to cover the avalanche
of votes for FPJ that came in from Luzon,
including Metro Manila.
 Registered GMA FPJ
Region Voters Total Votes % Votes Votes GMA Lead FPJ Lead
1 2,323,285 1,911,866 82% 685,356 837,613 152,257
2 1,498,780 1,121,273 75% 362,548 501,088 138,540
CAR 762,268 568,422 75% 224,686 148,426 76,260
3 4,958,425 3,747,918 76% 1,408,196 1,592,678 184,482
NCR 5,925,347 3,960,283 67% 1,048,016 1,452,389 404,373
4 5,528,898 4,087,064 74% 970,275 1,756,485 786,210
4B 1,191,930 895,020 75% 236,841 478,234 241,393
5 2,431,584 1,870,232 77% 540,638 465,480 75,158
LUZON 24,620,517 18,162,078 74% 5,476,556 7,232,393 1,755,837

6 3,592,213 2,680,650 75% 1,578,340 692,746 885,594

7 3,297,946 2,501,999 76% 1,810,946 405,832 1,405,114
8 2,078,555 1,546,755 74% 702,785 670,000 32,785
VISAYAS 8,968,714 6,729,404 75% 4,092,071 1,768,578 2,323,493

GMA’s artificial lead 567,656

in Luzon and Visayas
45
Historically, the vote-rich Lingayen to
Lucena corridor elects a president.
This covers Pangasinan, Tarlac,
Pampanga, Bulacan, Metro Manila,
Rizal, Laguna, Cavite, Batangas and
Quezon.
In other words, without the 951,695 votes
added to GMA in the PCIB area, GMA
would be losing by 383,939 !!!

These figures only scratch the surface.

And this is why, GMA made at least 15

calls to Garci.
 May 29, 2004

19 days AFTER election

GMA: Hello…Garci.
Garci: Hello, Ma’am, good morning …
GMA: So, will I still lead by more than
1 M overall? ...
Garci: Pipilitin ho natin yan ...
GMA: Ah, ok, ok.

48
Mrs. Arroyo called Garcillano 15 times
from May 26 to June 10, 2004.

The following graphs illustrate the

result of those calls.
LANAO DEL SUR
LA NA O DEL SU R

ERs ERs PCOC

FPJPM TALLY NAMFREL TALLY

81%
75%

56%
44%

25%
19%

FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA

183,724 42,803 67,989 52,663 42,803 128,301

Total votes affected by DAGDAG BAWAS 226,120

 June 2, 2004

23 days AFTER elections

Garci: Hello, ma’am. Good evening.

GMA: Hello, tungkol dun sa Lanao del Sur at Basilan,
di raw nagma-match ang SoV sa CoC …
Garci: Hindi na nag-match? May posibilidad na hindi mag-
match kung hindi nila sinunod iyong individual SoV ng
mga munisipyo …
Dun naman sa Basilan at Lanao del Sur, ito ho yung
ginawa nilang pataas sa inyo. Maayos na naman ang
paggawa eh.
GMA: So nag-mamatch.
 May 28, 2004
18 days AFTER elections

Garci: Hello, good evening ma’am.

GMA: The FPJ camp raw will file a case raw against the Board of
Canvassers and the military in Marawi?

Garci: Hindi naman ho siguro nila maa-ano yung ating Board of

Canvassers, pero ang military, kasi si Gudani, sa kanila si
Gudani. I do not know why they will file.
GMA: Oo, oo.

Garci: Sa kanila si Gudani ma’am. In fact that’s why we have, I

have to work with Gen. Esperon and Gen. Kiamco na at that
time, pinalitan namin si Gudani for a while.
Kaya kwan, pero bakit nila file-filan yang mga military na sa
kanila lahat. Halos ayaw na nga mag-give way sa aming
mga tao.
 Atty. Jimmy Paz
Chief of Staff of June 8, 2004
Chairman
Benjamin Abalos 29 days AFTER elections

Jim: Boss, nakatanggap ako ng certification ngayon dito

galing sa mga bata natin sa Lanao, nag failure na
naman pala dahil kay Gudani.
Garci : Oo nga eh.
Jim : Putang-ina, sino ba yang Gudani, bakit ganun yun?
Garci : Yun ang pinaalis ko.
Jim : Oo nga, ba’t andudoon na naman, papaano ‘to?
Garci : Oo nga, bumalik na naman. Kaya nga ayaw makialam
si First Gentleman dyan. Sabi ko nga, pinasabihan ko
nga kay Ruben Reyes na paalisin na nyo yan.
Jim : Putang-ina, tarantado talaga to.
Garci : Oo, pinaalis ko yan eh. Pero after three days after
elections, bumalik man dyan. Ang nag (garbled) dyan
si Col. Pirino thru Gen. Esperon at tsaka si Gen.
Kiamco.
In support of Gen. Gudani’s testimony:
BASILAN
 June 7, 2004

Garci: Hello. 28 days AFTER elections

GMA: Hello, did you get my text about the Tipo-Tipo?
Garci: Oho, oho Ma’am kwan ho, that’s what I’m being
fearful about. Kung si Rashma Hali * yun,
that’s why we’re asking people to look for her.
so that we can control her.
GMA: She’s probably already being held by them.
Garci: Ma’am?
GMA: She’s being held by them already.
Garci: She is here, that’s why if it is possible
we will ask her family to call her up from
Zamboanga.
 June 7, 2004

3 hours AFTER the first call

GMA: Hello, ano nahanap na ninyo?

Garci: Ma’am?
GMA: Ano nahanap na ninyo iyong sa Tipo-
tipo?
Garci: Tipo-tipo, hindi pa. Ang inaano nila
ngayon kaya nga...(line cut)

* HADJA RASHMA HALI –

Election Officer of Municipality of Tipo-Tipo, Basilan.
BASI LA N

ERs MCOC PCOC

88%

62%
58%

42%
38%

12%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
73,274 10,198 74,884 53,495 48,685 79,702

Total votes affected by ERs to MCOC 44,907

DAGDAG BAWAS ERs to PCOC 94,089
 June 2, 2004

23 days AFTER election

Garci: Hello, ma’am. Good evening.

GMA: Hello, tungkol dun sa Lanao del Sur at Basilan,
di raw nagma-match ang SoV sa CoC …
Garci: Hindi na nag-match? May posibilidad na hindi mag-
match kung hindi nila sinunod iyong individual SoV ng
mga munisipyo …
Dun naman sa Basilan at Lanao del Sur, ito ho yung
ginawa nilang pagpataas sa inyo. Maayos na naman ang
paggawa eh.
GMA: So nag-mamatch.
Male: believed to June 3, 2004
be Mike Arroyo 24 days AFTER elections
Garci: Hello?
Male: Padre, yun daw sa Basilan wala nang
nagbabantay pare. Pinabayaan na ng
mga tao. Yun na lang ang natitira eh,
Basilan.
Garci: May petition kasi for annulment dun.
Male: Ah ganun.
Garci: Sumobra masyado.
Male: Pwedeng ikarga mo naman ‘yung
70,000 pare ... (line cut)
 Male: believed to June 3, 2004
be Mike Arroyo
24 days AFTER elections
Male: Padre, may pag-asa pa ba tayo?
Sa Basilan pala pwede pa eh. Tsaka sa Isabela.
Garci: Oo.
Male : Pero sitenta mil ang kailangan pare eh. 70,000 na
lang kailangan, hati-hatiin mo na lang ‘yun.
Tig-kokonti lang ‘yun. Ano na pare, patotohanin mo na.
Wala nang pag-asa yan. Patotohanin mo na. Kung ano
na lang ang konsiderasyon sabihin mo na lang sa akin
kung ano pang additional. Pare, pakisuyo lang, pakitapos
na lang para ‘yun na lang aanuhin ko sa ‘yo. Ha?
Marami pang natitira, pwede pang idagdag eh ha?
Garci: O sige, sige.
Male : 70,000 lang ang kailangan pare.
Garci: Ok sige.
BASI LA N

ERs MCOC PCOC

88%

62%
58%

42%
38%

69,504
12%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
73,274 10,198 74,884 53,495 48,685 79,702

Total votes affected by ERs to MCOC 44,907

DAGDAG BAWAS ERs to PCOC 94,089
SULU
SU LU

ERs MCOC PCOC

62%
56% 56%

44% 44%
38%

FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA

96,622 60,357 60,807 78,429 60,807 78,429

Total votes affected by DAGDAG BAWAS 53,893

 May 27, 2004

17 days AFTER elections

GMA : Hello, meron tayong ... (?) ...

E.R.? para sa Sulu?
Garci : Oo ma’am, meron po.
GMA : Nagco-correspond ?
Garci : Oo ma’am. Lahat ho meron, hindi
po namin ika-count kung ...
GMA : Ok, ok.
TAWI-TAWI
 May 26, 2004

16 days AFTER elections

GMA: Hello, Hello.

Garci: Hello ma’am good morning po.
GMA: Oo, oo. Si ano, si Biazon nagbabanta,
kung madadaya daw siya papabuksan
daw niya yung sa ... at sa Tawi-tawi,
eh baka raw ako ang madale doon...
Garci: Baka nga ho ... (line faded, cut)
TAWI -TAWI

ER PCOC

79%

60%

40%

21%

FPJ GMA FPJ GMA

60,436 16,631 49,803 33,634

Total votes affected by DAGDAG BAWAS 27,236

SULTAN KUDARAT
COLU MB IO, S ULT AN KUDA RA T

ER MCOC PSOV

93% 93%

56%

44%

7% 7%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
5,376 4,082 545 7,100 545 7,100

DISCREPANCY 7,859
KALA MA NSI G, SU LT AN KUD AR AT

ER MCOC PSOV

90%

78% 79%

22% 21% 10%

FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
8,180 2,309 8,580 2,220 1,056 10,580

DISCREPANCY 15,395
LEB AK , SU LTA N K UDAR AT

ER MCOC PSOV

85%
73% 73%

27% 27%
15%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
14,458 5,265 14,664 5,333 2,678 15,621

DISCREPANCY 22,136
PA LEMB AN G, S ULTAN KUD ARA T

ER MCOC PSOV

95%

71%

55%
45%
29%

5%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
4,486 5,460 3,776 9,127 566 11,723

DISCREPANCY 10,183
TA CU RONG CI TY, SU LTA N K UDAR AT

ER MCOC PSOV

89%

78% 77%

22% 23%
11%
FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA
14,734 4,160 15,226 4,577 566 4,577

DISCREPANCY 14,585
SU LTAN KUDA RAT

ER MCOC PCOC

76%
68%
62%

38%
32% 24%

FPJ GMA FPJ GMA FPJ GMA

124,700 58,837 110,140 69,980 40,714 126,822

DISCREPANCY 151,971
COTABATO
ELLEN PERALTA May 26, 2004
Executive Assistant
Office of Commissioner Garcillano
16 days AFTER elections

Len: Hello.
Garci: Hello, Len. I-remind nga sila kung
nakapagpadala ba sila ng SOV 15 to 18 sheets
sa kwan, sa Cotabato.
Len: Dito, sila ano, sila Ester?
Garci: Yung pang switch. Kung sinabihan sila ni
Chairman kasi nagsabi raw si Chairman
kagabi…
Len: Itatanong ko kay ano, kay Ester ho.
Garci: Ok

ESTER VILLAFLOR ROXAS – Director of Election Records and Statistics Department,

Comelec. Also in-charge of allocation and distribution of SOVs and COCs.
• GMA wanted a lead of
at least one (1) million votes.
• At that point, GMA had an artificial lead of
567,656 from Luzon and Visayas.
• Garcillano tampered with the results in
Mindanao giving GMA an additional
496,116 votes.
• As a result, GMA got what she wanted:
a lead of 1,063,772 votes.

85
 Registered GMA
Region Voters Total Votes % Votes FPJ Votes GMA Lead FPJ Lead
9 1,619,151 1,114,341 69% 537,838 441,799 96,039
10 2,067,109 1,492,414 72% 642,488 630,059 12,429
11 2,134,415 1,500,265 70% 618,110 626,786 8,676
12 1,867,539 1,266,799 68% 405,282 496,942 91,660
ARMM 1,095,441 889,827 81% 549,944 272,715 277,229
CARAGA 1,163,142 878,416 76% 477,461 266,706 210,755

MINDANAO 9,946,797 7,142,062 72% 3,231,123 2,735,007 496,116

86
But if we look at NAMFREL’s count, we
see some interesting items.
GMA Votes FPJ Votes GMA Lead FPJ Lead
Congress 9 537,838 441,799 96,039
NAMFREL 84% 430,200 383,526 46,674
Congress 10 642,488 630,059 12,429
NAMFREL 87% 529,641 569,030 39,389
Congress 11 618,110 626,786 8,676
NAMFREL 87% 527,984 543,812 15,828
Congress 12 405,282 496,942 91,660
NAMFREL 50% 150,949 280,375 129,426
Congress ARMM 549,944 272,715 277,229
NAMFREL 52% 167,065 249,767 82,702
Congress CARAGA 477,461 266,706 210,755
NAMFREL 72% 337,733 194,209 143,524

Congress MINDANAO 3,231,123 2,735,007 496,116

NAMFREL 74% 2,143,572 2,220,719   77,147

87
How were the fraudulent results
legitimized? Noted

• Congressional refusal to open

the ERs.

• Congressional dismissal of
objections. “Noted” … “Noted.”
 3:38 a.m. June 24, 2005
House of Representatives

In the dead of night, GMA walked into

Congress to be proclaimed.
Is this the legacy we shall leave for
the future generations?
NO. A thousand times, NO ! ! !
Today’s chaos is the result of corruption and
greed in high places, loss of respect for our
institutions and the death of moral values.
And the root of it all is a hopelessly flawed
electoral system.
We must change or our nation will perish.

Let us put a closure to these ISSUES . . .

• Support and pursue to their natural
conclusions the Senate inquiries initiated
by Senators Biazon and Gordon on the
Montalban raid and missing election
returns, respectively.
• Charge in the appropriate courts of law,
the Comelec Commissioners, Provincial
Supervisors and Election Officers with the
election offenses resulting from the
irregularities and anomalies in the 2004
election.
3. Identify the teachers who were not able to
serve on May 10,2004 but have
corresponding “certified” election
returns.
4. Continue the information dissemination
on the massive electoral fraud to as many
Filipinos as possible so they will know in
greater detail how they were deprived of
their votes.

Only then can we publicly unearth

the TRUTH . . .
“
… and the TRUTH
shall set us FREE.
”
Precinct
97
 Third
Membe
r
Chairma
n
Poll
Clerk

Recording of Votes on ER
Precinct
98
Election Returns (ER) 99
 District
Superintend Election
ent Officer

City /
Municipal
Treasurer

Canvassing of ERs at the

City / Municipal Hall
100
The Statement of Votes
(SOV) by Precinct is
prepared by the City /
Municipal Board of
Canvassers to record the
votes of each candidate
in each precinct in the city
or municipality. The SOV
by Precinct is certified by
the Board of Canvassers
and witnessed by the
accredited party
watchers.
101
The City / Municipal
Certificate of Canvass
(COC) is prepared by
the Board of
Canvassers. The COC
contains the total votes
of each candidate for
the whole city or
municipality. The COC
is certified by the Board
of Canvassers and
witnessed by the
accredited party
watchers.
102
 Provincial
Superintend Election
ent of Supervisor
Schools

Provincial
Fiscal

Canvassing at the Provincial Capitol

103
The Statement of Votes
(SOV) by City /
Municipality is prepared
by the Provincial Board of
Canvassers to record the
votes of each candidate
in each city and
municipality of the
Province. The SOV by
City / Municipality is
certified by the Board of
Canvassers and
witnessed by the
accredited party
watchers. 104
The Provincial
Certificate of Canvass
(COC) is prepared by
the Board of
Canvassers. The COC
contains the total votes
of each candidate for
the whole Province.
The COC is certified by
the Board of
Canvassers and
witnessed by the
accredited party
watchers. 105
National Canvassing at the Congress 106
107
108