EXPLAINING HOW NEW TAX LAWS HELP OUR

CANNABIS INDUSTRY TO SCREW THE CDSA

Due to recent [FC] Federal Court tax-evasion charges
and subsequent FC tax ruling, any member /grower
for a not for profit cannabis society is now guilty for not
paying sales tax, without the benefit of legalizing it.
In practice [when placed in context of other case law
rulings like the Felger case] leads to this: all growers are
now defined as 'being occupied in a retail premise'.
SOMEHOW now, the right to hold a fiduciary trust to be a farmer for a
society, under a common law commercial premise, has been taken away.
NOW [think out of the box] We asked senior auditors for
Canada Revenue Charities [CRC]: Does that mean anyone
growing /selling cannabis even in a not-for profit society must
now pay sales taxes? And the answer is obviously YES.
We then pried out of them that as far as CRC is concerned,
THAT it didn't matter whether we collected PST or GST,
BECAUSE [in BC] we formally voted out HST; this means our EDAs and its
agencies are directly permitted to remit/pay PST instead of GST - and still
comply with this general rule that we must now pay a sales tax.
UNDER THE GOLDEN RULE: If you pay taxes to the Rome
means you must obey Roman rules MEANS IN THIS CASE
that by paying GST to the Feds results where they must obey
every s-55 rule /regulation after this spring's final Appeal's Court ruling
Check it out - https://www.scribd.com/doc/206723278/2a-s-55-of-the-CDSA-report
- This is their lists of over 30 categories of regulations growers must now comply with

BECAUSE: by paying GST, means you agree to obey every statutory rule
and regulation that [in theory] they need in order to sell cannabis in the USA

So what's the big difference between paying GST versus PST?

By choosing to pay GST, [a statutory tax] means you now
must obey all those new CDSA statutory rules /restrictions
CATCH 22: Our EDA /agencies and growers can pay PST,
By paying PST means we choose to be governed under our
BC common law rulings, because PST is a common law tax
IN LAW, THIS MEANS THAT: As long as our EDA agencies and growers
prescribe to PST common law rules, results where NOT even 1 over-bearing
rule or regulation under the CDSA applies [other than common sense rules]
Our cannabis industry actually should thank Mr. Harper
for taking too much too fast, because by doing so, he actually
empowered us to just say; NO to paying his GST, and in law
that means not-1 CDSA rule or regulation can be forced on
any of our EDAs or its' agencies or members by paying PST.
Mr. Harper inadvertently legalized our cannabis industry
by getting drunk on his own obsession for despot powers

IN CANADA everyone can now choose to comply with GST or PST.

When MMPR licensees pay GST, means they can [in theory]
supply a Federally licensed store in the USA that wants to
compete against cannabis provided under state regulations.
The biggest drawback to paying PST is that we cannot do
any business in the USA or with any foreigners [period]
IN THIS WAY: by pressing this remedy as a strictly domestic political issue,
means that under their laws, the Federal Courts and the CDSA are directly
forbidden from trespassing on any of our common law rights.
AT PRESENT, the only way to fully benefit from our PST
loophole on cannabis is by prescribing to IC75-2R8 protocol
Any landed citizen in Canada can do this loophole by forming
a local EDA [Electoral District Ass.] like we did in Vancouver.
Any Marijuana Party EDA can register a cannabis farmer [like an old MMAR
grower] and also open local Co-op Private Members Clubs, so that they can
do common law commerce with each other, under Freedom of Contract.
ON THIS: We're not reinventing the wheel here; we're simply insisting that
when Harper gave us the tools to say NO means, we can and are declaring
to be duty-bound to protect the private individual rights of our members.
The EDA itself is only transferring PST that was remitted by
shareholder /members of any EDA Co-op in order to protect
our common law commercial rights. This provincial sales tax
stays in the province AND that means all those BC Supreme
Court victories that were overturned in Federal Court are now
the law of the land, because those Federal Courts and the CDSA simply
have no jurisdiction to control our common law marijuana activities [period]
In BC's case that means: any grower or dispensary can
be grandfathered into our perfectly legal PST loophole,
as long as these new EDA agency prescribe to the rules
and protocol under our IC75-2R8 loophole [then poof]
The entire EDA is now 'prescribed by law' [Sec 1 of the Charter]
to protect our marijuana beliefs that the majority thinks are wrong or false,
Lest we forget: this individual Freedom defines what Democracy is all about
BOTTOM LINE: We can only offer a 'bullet-proof defence'
FRANKLY: The rest is up to you to take it or leave it.
It's actually up to you [and no one else] to declare that;
We're mad as hell and you're not going to take this anymore.
What we're protecting is defined as a fundamental doctrine
in order to preserve a Free and Democratic Society that's
upheld under the rubric of: Consent of the governed [A. Cox]
thru hopefully Peaceful CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE to a bad law or
a particular set of laws that erode the very fine-laced fabric that binds us by
laws that are written to protect Freedom itself, under our common law rights.