Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 04-10-26 Samaan V Zernik (SC087400) "Non Party" Countrywide's Fraud in Underwriting Letter - DKT #44 Country S

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    17 views31 pages
    The fraudulent October 26, 2004 Underwriting Letter, (see also fraud expert opinion letter #18) was filed in court first in November 2006, misrepresented as an October 14, 2004 Underwriting Letter. It was repeatedly filed in court afterwards, even after fraud expert opinion on the letter was issued. See separately fraud expert opinion by Robert Meister. The fax was considered a key fraud records. It was an invalid, unverified letter. It was marked in the header as faxed on October 26, 2004, and it was marked in its body as printed on October 26, 2004, but Countrywide repeatedly filed declarations that it was a valid October 14, or mid-October 2004 Underwriting Letter. Starting June 2007 Angelo MOZILO – then President/CEO and Sandor SAMUELS – then Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide were personally requested to address the alleged fraud in this record. Conduct of Countrywide and Bank of America relative to this letter documented disintegration of internal and external audit. Bank of America refused to review complaints in this matter filed with the Audit Committee pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002). (see #90) Therefore, the loan applications and their underwriting documented also disintegration of audit at Bank of America.

    Original Title

    04-10-26 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) "Non Party" Countrywide's Fraud in Underwriting Letter - Dkt #44 Country s

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The fraudulent October 26, 2004 Underwriting Letter, (see also fraud expert opinion letter #18) was filed in court first in November 2006, misrepresented as an October 14, 2004 Underwriting Letter. It was repeatedly filed in court afterwards, even after fraud expert opinion on the letter was issued. See separately fraud expert opinion by Robert Meister. The fax was considered a key fraud records. It was an invalid, unverified letter. It was marked in the header as faxed on October 26, 2004, and it was marked in its body as printed on October 26, 2004, but Countrywide repeatedly filed declarations that it was a valid October 14, or mid-October 2004 Underwriting Letter. Starting June 2007 Angelo MOZILO – then President/CEO and Sandor SAMUELS – then Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide were personally requested to address the alleged fraud in this record. Conduct of Countrywide and Bank of America relative to this letter documented disintegration of internal and external audit. Bank of America refused to review complaints in this matter filed with the Audit Committee pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002). (see #90) Therefore, the loan applications and their underwriting documented also disintegration of audit at Bank of America.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    17 views31 pages

    04-10-26 Samaan V Zernik (SC087400) "Non Party" Countrywide's Fraud in Underwriting Letter - DKT #44 Country S

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    The fraudulent October 26, 2004 Underwriting Letter, (see also fraud expert opinion letter #18) was filed in court first in November 2006, misrepresented as an October 14, 2004 Underwriting Letter. It was repeatedly filed in court afterwards, even after fraud expert opinion on the letter was issued. See separately fraud expert opinion by Robert Meister. The fax was considered a key fraud records. It was an invalid, unverified letter. It was marked in the header as faxed on October 26, 2004, and it was marked in its body as printed on October 26, 2004, but Countrywide repeatedly filed declarations that it was a valid October 14, or mid-October 2004 Underwriting Letter. Starting June 2007 Angelo MOZILO – then President/CEO and Sandor SAMUELS – then Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide were personally requested to address the alleged fraud in this record. Conduct of Countrywide and Bank of America relative to this letter documented disintegration of internal and external audit. Bank of America refused to review complaints in this matter filed with the Audit Committee pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002). (see #90) Therefore, the loan applications and their underwriting documented also disintegration of audit at Bank of America.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 31

    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 1 of 31

    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 2 of 31


    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 3 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 4 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 5 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 6 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 7 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 8 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 9 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 10 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 11 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 12 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 13 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 14 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 15 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 16 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 17 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 18 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 19 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 20 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 21 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 22 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 23 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 24 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 25 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 26 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 27 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 28 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 29 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 30 of 31
    Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 44 Filed 04/17/2008 Page 31 of 31

    You might also like