Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heron House, Ark, Chairman Stanley Fink at The Jewish Chronicle
Heron House, Ark, Chairman Stanley Fink at The Jewish Chronicle
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Archives
Search Subscriptions
S&P
About
NEWS SPORT BUSINESS COMMENT ARTS LIFESTYLE COMMUNITY JUDAISM TRAVEL BLOGS PROPERTY FORUMS
Not that these political ambitions have meant the tycoon has been distracted from his
business activities. Fink, who turned 52 this week, is an increasingly powerful force in the
City, where he is considered to be one of the finest brains in his field. And, perhaps
surprisingly, given the image of the cut-throat world of hedge funds, he is also held to be a
genuinely nice guy by those who have dealings with him.
A brain tumour in 2005 hastened his decision to step down from his position as chief
executive of Man Group — the world’s largest listed hedge fund with assets of more than
$80 billion — to pursue his philanthropic interests, but he has since resurfaced as the Brawer & Hauptman
Specializing in
chief executive of International Standard Asset Management (Isam) — a small hedge fund Synagogue
chaired by former Labour Party fundraiser Lord Levy. Fink is worth an estimated £70 Architecture.
million, according to The Sunday Times Rich List. www.brawerhauptman.c
While acknowledging that his parents would have preferred him to remain Orthodox, he
adds: “When we got married we lived in an area that wasn’t really in walking distance of a
synagogue and I didn’t want to feel a hypocrite driving to an Orthodox synagogue on
Shabbat and High Holy Days. And we didn’t know a lot of people in the area so sitting
apart from my wife wasn’t something I looked forward to.”
The couple spent time “shuling around”, as he puts it, and tried out a Liberal shul. “We
found it most welcoming and with the greatest sense of community,” he recalls.
Now a longstanding member of a Liberal congregation in north-west London — he
prefers not to reveal which one — he says he understands two thirds of an Orthodox
service and 90 per cent of a Liberal one.
“You feel it is more of a service where you can participate; there’s no talking, people listen
and children sit there for an hour, an hour and a quarter.” Besides, he says, he enjoys
being one of the more religious people in a less religious synagogue.
He reveals that one of the reasons he backed Boris Johnson for London mayor was his
view that Johnson’s rival, Ken Livingstone, was unfriendly to Jews.
“Even if I had not had any affiliation to the Tory party, I would have been a big supporter of
Boris ahead of Ken,” he says. “I felt that Boris was extremely good at bringing
communities together and helping them to work together, whereas Ken would cynically
exploit the differences between communities and in the case of Jews, took the view that
pandering to the Muslim vote was more important than pandering to Jewish vote.
Basically, he demonstrated that he wasn’t a friend of Anglo-Jewry.”
Much of his outlook on life — his politics and his philanthropy — he attributes to his
experience as a young man growing up in a lower middle-class family in Manchester
where his father ran a grocery shop.
“I have always been instinctively slightly right of centre,” he says. “I saw the negative
impact of trade unions first hand when I did a couple of student jobs.” He was working in a
paper factory in Bury and had developed a new method of generating more orders. After a
couple of days he was taken aside by a trade union shop steward. “He told me that this
was very unhelpful because he had people who weren’t able to pick orders at quite the
same rate and could I do it one at a time,” recalls Fink. “I remember thinking that was a
great shame because clearly my way was better for the company. I saw a negative side of
trade unions. I understood it but I didn’t accept it. I think that hardened my views.”
He believes he inherited his philanthropic streak from his parents. “They were never rich
but they always had the philosophy that if you were approached by somebody you knew or
a cause you had a connection with it wasn’t a question of ‘yes’ or ‘no’, but of ‘how much?’”
He says there is a responsibility on successful people to give. “If you are fortunate to be
able to pay high-rate tax, then you can afford to give a bit more to charity. How much more
is a matter for one’s own conscience.”
Today, he and his wife, Barbara — they met in their teens while working for a Jewish
voluntary youth organisation in Manchester — are particularly interested in charities
involved in children’s welfare and the environment. “We tend to rarely say no but we tend
to give less if it’s not in our key themes,” Fink says. He is the newly-appointed chair of
children’s charity ARK (Absolute Return for Kids) and has helped raise millions of pounds
for the Evelina Children’s Hospital Appeal Committee, attached to Guy’s and St Thomas’
Hospital.
The money that allows such generosity has been accumulated during Fink’s steady rise
through the financial world. After Manchester Grammar school and Cambridge University,
where he gained a law degree, he landed his first job at the accountancy firm Arthur
Andersen. Next up was Mars, Citibank and then Man Group in 1987, where he worked his
way up, gaining the post of chief executive in 2000.
Known by colleagues as “the Godfather” of the hedge fund industry, he has left a legions
of admirers in his wake — Philip Beresford, compiler of The Sunday Time Rich List,
describes him as inspiring.
“He is one of the finest brains in the City, who is now striking out on a new career trying to
mobilise the City to think of disadvantaged communities here and around the world. He is
an inspiration to all those hedge-fund managers to think of something different in life. He
is clearly thinking of the long term and sees wealth as something that should be used for
the benefit of society.”
According to Howard Leigh, fellow Tory treasurer and financier, Fink is a “super guy”.
It was through a Jewish charity that Fink first met Lord Levy. They have long been
acquaintances, but their current business association began only a year ago, while Fink
was still on sabbatical from the City.
“Michael approached me because he was thinking of joining Isam, and I was able to say
that I knew the principals and found them to be very decent people, so I gave him a
positive reference,” he explains.
“Michael’s mix of skills were clearly more on the people side — he hadn’t had
management responsibilities in a financial services business in the recent past, and it
turned out that they needed a general management role if they were going to grow
successfully. At that point, Michael and the team asked me to join and I said yes.”
The Isam way of working suits Fink’s ambition to try a different way of doing business after
Man. Isam places the emphasis on the judgement of the individual trader when it comes
to investments, as opposed to relying on computer programmes such as used by Man’s
flagship AHL Diversified fund.
“It meant a lot to me that people believed that I had gone elsewhere and not just copied
the formula,” he says. “I’ve always taken pride that I have never been a plagiarist and so
that was important to me.”
It is almost 12 months into his new role and “things are going well in what has been an
interesting year for our industry”, he says.
Does he chat politics with Lord Levy? “We do talk politics. We have historically respected
our differences. I understand his background and where he comes from and I think he
understands mine. It’s a bit like how I am friendly with Jews who are Orthodox and Jews
who are Liberal. People always focus on the differences between people, forgetting that
genetically we are probably 99 per cent similar and one per cent different.
“Michael and I have much more in common than we have differences — we have so many
similar views on Judaism, philanthropy, family and Israel.”
Fink, who used to make monthly trips to the Holy Land when he was a director of the
Israeli confectionary company Elite, has strong views on Middle-East peace.
“I am a believer that a peace deal should be done but I am aware that in order to make
peace, you have to have a partner to agree. I think that is the thing that many people in the
non-Jewish press and media overlook. Whenever Israel has had a credible partner to
make peace, it has found a way to do it, even if it has involved some compromises and
unpopular decisions. The sad thing with Hamas is that it is not a credible partner for
peace. But in areas where there has been a credible partner, such as Egypt and Jordan,
Israel has always been prepared to make peace and I would always applaud that.”
It is a typically thoughtful response — throughout the interview, Fink takes time when
responding to questions, never rushing his answers.
He takes some time to reply when asked what would be top of a Tory government to-do
list should the party win the election next year.
Pointing out that he is not involved with front-line politics, he continues: “I think, from
speaking to Conservatives, the central thread coming through is people taking personal
responsibility for their lives. There is certainly a desire that the state should be a bit
smaller and people should be bit bigger and more grown up about their destinies. There
is a feeling that big central solutions to things like education is probably wrong, and that
sometimes smaller, more localised decisions and solutions are better.”
Fink is chair of Ark, a charity which runs academy schools in London. It has a roll of 4,400
children. As someone so involved in education it is perhaps surprising that he admits he
has “flip-flopped” over the issue of faith schools.
His initial preference for his own children was to send them to a Jewish primary and
mainstream secondary. “I think it is important to learn about your own faith, and then learn
that you live in a wider world, and to encounter relationships with people of different faiths
before you go to university.
He says he is sceptical about some aspects of faith schools at secondary level. “I came to
question people who claim to believe in faith secondaries but who really just want a
slightly better education for their children without paying for it. I was always slightly
sceptical about people who were passionate supporters of faith secondaries.”
He was also worried about what was being taught in some faith secondaries, specifically
whether they were failing to promote religious tolerance.
“But when I reflected on it, my final view was to look at society’s ills as a whole — high
pregnancy rates, crime — and to realise that if a faith school can impart discipline and
morals to some people then, even discounting for the fact that some people don’t share
the experience of mixing with other religions, perhaps there is more good in having faith
schools, irrespective of what faith they are teaching.”
He points out that one of Ark’s academy schools is nominally a Church of England school,
has a majority of Muslim pupils, has a Catholic head teacher and a Jewish sponsor and
chair of governors — himself. “I think that is actually really neat,” he says.
What does he make of the JFS case? “The Court of Appeal judgment is complicated in
that Jews need to decide whether we are a religion or a race and there are times where
there seems to be confusion in the thinking.”
A typical working week for Fink comprises 30-plus hours on “the day job” at Isam, one day
a week on Tory Party matters and around 10-plus hours on philanthropy. He relaxes by
skiing, playing golf, enjoying good dinner conversation and playing Sudoku.
Such a hectic schedule is perhaps remarkable for a man who, only four years ago,
suffered a brain tumour. He was on a safari in Botswana with his wife and children when
he was taken ill. Doctors discovered a benign tumour, which was successfully operated
on.
The experience made him realise that life “is not a dress rehearsal”, speeding up his
decision to leave Man Group to take on more charitable work.
“At the time I think I underestimated how long it would take to recover my stamina,” he
says. “I got most things back within a year and assumed that that was about as good as I
was going to heal, and at that point, my stamina was still quite limited. But I carried on
getting better for three or more years. Maybe my decision to step down was based on
inadequate information and if I wanted to, I probably could have carried on working.
Although frankly, given the way the industry has evolved, maybe it was not a bad thing for
me to step away from Man.”
The hedge fund industry is facing turbulent times, what with the imminent 50 per cent tax
on high earners, EU plans for stricter regulation, and having to deal with the public’s
perception that it helped cause the recession. But who does Fink feel was responsible for
the banking collapse? Again, he takes time before answering.
“I think you have to look for blame in three or four tiers. In the medium-term, it was
commercial banks which were competing with one another to lend at narrower and
narrower credit spreads to parties of very poor credit worthiness or parties who were
reasonably credit-worthy but deserved to pay a higher price to reflect the risk. So, it was a
case of the banks not really pricing the risk properly.
“The longer-term battle probably began in the Clinton era in America where banks were
forced to lend some of their assets to the sub-prime market as it was deemed that a large
part of the US population was not being serviced by the banking community. And so, the
banks were lending to people of poor credit history.
“You could say it was that original encouragement to lend unsuitable individuals large
amounts of credit, and that it was the good intentions by the government which started the
problem in terms of the sub-prime crisis.
“You could also say it was the credit agencies’ fault for allowing tranches of bad debt. I
think that when certain scenarios happened there was a bit of contagion and all the
actuarial models fell apart.”
He adds: “There had been before that a general under-pricing of risks in markets. Markets
assumed that benign conditions would last forever.”
Fink speaks from the perspective of someone intimately acquainted with the workings of
the financial markets. It is the sort of knowledge that will prove to be invaluable should the
Conservative Party win the 2010 election, when it looks as if the Manchester grocer’s boy
will find himself playing a powerful role in the running of the country’s economy as it
emerges from recession.
Stanley Fink
Subscribe Contact us Advertise with us E-Paper Terms & conditions RSS feeds Send us a photo