Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proposed Rule: Air Pollution Standards of Performance For New Stationary Sources: Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
Proposed Rule: Air Pollution Standards of Performance For New Stationary Sources: Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
Proposed Rule: Air Pollution Standards of Performance For New Stationary Sources: Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
Examples of potentially
Category NAICS code regulated entities
Any State, local, or Tribal government using a VSMWC 562213, 92411 Solid waste combustion units burning municipal waste col-
unit as defined in the regulations. lected from the general public and from residential, com-
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:14 Nov 22, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24NOP1.SGM 24NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 226 / Friday, November 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules 67833
Examples of potentially
Category NAICS code regulated entities
Any church or convent using an OSWI unit as defined in 8131 Churches and convents.
the regulations.
Any civic or religious organization using an OSWI unit as 8134 Civic associations and fraternal associations.
defined in the regulations.
This table is not intended to be After considering the economic ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide impact of today’s proposed rule on Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
for readers regarding entities likely to be small entities, I certify that this action Section (6PD–L), Environmental
regulated by the proposed rule. To will not have a significant economic Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
determine whether your facility is impact on a substantial number of small Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
regulated by the proposed rule, you entities. This action does not propose Comments may also be submitted
should examine the applicability any changes to the final OSWI rule, in electronically or through hand delivery/
criteria in 40 CFR 60.2885 through which we determined that the final rule courier by following the detailed
60.2888 of subpart EEEE, and in the would not have a significant economic instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
emission guidelines for existing sources impact on a substantial number of small the direct final rule located in the rules
located at 40 CFR 60.2991 through entities.
section of this Federal Register.
60.2994 of subpart FFFF. If you have For additional information, see the
any questions regarding the direct final rule published in the Rules FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
applicability of the proposed rule to a and Regulations section of this Federal Kenneth W. Boyce, Air Planning Section
particular entity, contact the person Register. (6PD–L), Environmental Protection
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60 Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
CONTACT section. Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733 at
Environmental protection,
What Are the Administrative (214) 665–7259, or
Administrative practice and procedure,
Requirements for This Action? boyce.kenneth@epa.gov.
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
For a complete discussion of all the relations, Reporting and recordkeeping SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
administrative requirements applicable requirements. final rules section of this Federal
to this action, see the direct final rule in Dated: November 17, 2006. Register, EPA is approving the State’s
the Rules and Regulations section of this Stephen L. Johnson, SIP submittal as a direct final rule
Federal Register. Administrator. without prior proposal because the
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) [FR Doc. E6–19862 Filed 11–22–06; 8:45 am] Agency views this as a noncontroversial
generally requires an agency to prepare BILLING CODE 6560–50–P submittal and anticipates no adverse
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any comments. A detailed rationale for the
rule subject to notice and comment approval is set forth in the direct final
rulemaking requirements under the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION rule. If no adverse comments are
Administrative Procedures Act or any AGENCY received in response to this action rule,
other stature unless the agency certifies no further activity is contemplated. If
that the rule will not have a significant 40 CFR Part 62
EPA receives relevant adverse
impact on a substantial number of small [EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0570; FRL–8247–1] comments, the direct final rule will be
entities. Small entities include small withdrawn and all public comments
businesses, small government Approval and Promulgation of State received will be addressed in a
organizations, and small government Plans for Designated Facilities and subsequent final rule based on this
jurisdictions. Pollutants: Bernalillo County, NM
proposed rule. The EPA will not
For purposes of assessing the impacts AGENCY: Environmental Protection institute a second comment period. Any
of today’s proposed rule on small Agency (EPA). parties interested in commenting on this
entities, small entity is defined as
ACTION: Proposed rule. action should do so at this time. Please
follows:
note that if EPA receives relevant
(1) A small business in the regulated SUMMARY: EPA is proposing approval of
adverse comment on an amendment,
industry that has a gross annual revenue the section 111(d) Plan submitted by paragraph, or section of this rule and if
less than $6 million (this varies by City of Albuquerque (Bernalillo
that provision may be severed from the
industry category, ranging up to $10.5 County), New Mexico, on May 24, 2006,
million for North American Industrial remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
to implement and enforce the Emission
Classification System (NAICS) code Guidelines (EG) for existing Municipal as final those provisions of the rule that
562213 (VSMWC)), based on Small Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills. The EG are not the subject of an adverse
Business Administration’s size require delegated municipalities to comment.
standards; develop plans to reduce landfill gas For additional information, see the
(2) A small governmental jurisdiction emissions from all MSWs. Finally, this direct final rule which is located in the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
that is a government of a city, county, action also proposes to approve the rules section of this Federal Register.
town, school district or special district concomitant delegation of authority to Dated: November 9, 2006.
with a population of less than 50,000; or implement 40 CFR part 60, subparts
WWW and Cc. Lawrence E. Starfield,
(3) A small organization that is any
not-for-profit enterprise that is DATES: Written comments must be Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
independently owned and operated and received on or before December 26, [FR Doc. E6–19860 Filed 11–22–06; 8:45 am]
is not dominant in its field. 2006. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:14 Nov 22, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24NOP1.SGM 24NOP1