Digitally signed

by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2011.04.08
20:34:12 +03'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-04-08 Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke,
Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian –
for Public Corruption and Racketeering

Executive Summary
Los Angeles, April 8 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles,
FBI, and Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe (Access To Justice Initiative, US Dept of Justice) against California Judge Peter Meeka and
Clerk John A Clarke, both of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Bank of America and its President Brian
Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian for public corruption and racketeering, pertaining to Fraud on the Court in Lomas v Bank of
America (KC059379).
In Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights through a Quiet Title action against
alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case:
− None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
− None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
− Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "off of the record";
− No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held: It was secretly listed as continued in the minutes, but falsely listed as
conducted in the online “Case Summary”;
− Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), where the true registration of the
proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
− An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naive reader to conclude that valid and effectual
proceedings have been held and rulings have been entered by the court.
− Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate of Attorney of Record. Attorney
Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleading banking records as "Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by
Judge Peter Meeka.
− No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was ever filed in the case.
Notice of the Fraud on the Court in Lomas v Bank of America was filed with President Brian Moynihan and with the office of General
Counsel of Bank of America. As was the case in previous instances of similar nature, Bank of America failed to stop such conduct.
Evidence of racketeering in the courts by Bank of America, including direct involvement of its President Brian Moynihan and former
Associate General Counsel Sandor Samuels was repeatedly filed with US law enforcement in recent years. During the same years,
Bank of America has been the recipient of hundreds of billions of US dollars in bailout funds from the US tax payer.
Ongoing tolerance of racketeering by Bank of America makes mockery of laws established by the US Congress in effort to restore the
integrity of US financial systems, such as the Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) and the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (2009). It also
highlights the false certifications of no fraud in operations, filed quarterly in SEC reports, and the ongoing failure of US banking and
securities regulation. Continued racketeering by leading US financial institutions undermines the integrity and stability of the US
financial system, and efforts by the US Congress to restore the stability of US economy.
Real estate and financial institutions fraud under the guise of court actions in the Los Angeles Superior Court goes back for over a
decade. Such conduct was key part of the evidence of the operation of the LA-JR (Alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket), as detailed
in the 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert (NGO) to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations. The submission was
later incorporated into the official Staff Report of the HRC, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and
discrimination by law enforcement in California".
The complaint was copied to the US Congress Judiciary and Banking Committees, SEC and Banking Regulators, the Basel Accord
Committee on International Banking, and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.
_______
z Page 2/9 April 8, 2011

Andre Birotte Jr.,

US Attorney, Central District of California.
221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012
By fax: 213-894-6269
FBI
Los Angeles and other offices
By email
Prof Laurence Tribe
Senior Counsel
US Department Of Justice
Access To Justice Initiative
By email

TO US ATTORNEY, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDRE BIROTTE AND TO PROF

LAURENCE TRIBE, SENIOR COUNSEL, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ACCESS TO JUSTICE
INITIATIVE, AND FBI:
Please accept instant Citizen’s Complaint by Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) against
California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, both of the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles, Bank of America, and Attorney Mark Asdourian for public corruption and
racketeering, pertaining to their conduct of Fraud on the Court in Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379).
Please also consider related complaints, previously filed with your offices against other judges of the and
Clerk John Clarke of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles as part of instant complaint.
Combined, the complaints provide overwhelming evidence of a well established racketeering enterprise at the
Court.
Please also notice below the request for Due Process in acknowledgment, review, and notice of outcome of
complaints filed with your offices.
COMPLAINT
A. General
1. What did the expert say about the current financial crisis?
− "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can
cheat and defraud without consequences."
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011) [ i ]
2. What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?
− "Innocent people remain in prison"
− "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the
Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system,
have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [ ii ]
− "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ iii ]

− "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges
must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [ iv ]
z Page 3/9 April 8, 2011

3. What did the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations say about the justice
system in California?
− “…corruption of the courts and the legal profession… in California” [v ]
4. What did Senior Counsel at US Department of Justice say about the state courts in the United States?
− "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to
Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the
disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world
nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010) [ vi ]
5. What did the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee say about the US justice system?
− In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a
"Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice. [vii ]
B. Complainants
Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, resident of Los Angeles County, California
Mailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: 323-515-4583
Fax: 323-488-9697
Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net
1. Complainants are not attorneys, neither are they represented by counsel in matters, which are
subject of instant complaint.
Therefore, in most case, no sections of the code were cited. Instead, the US Attorney is requested to
apply the correct sections of the code. In case errors were made, where sections of the code were cited,
the US Attorney is requested to disregard such citations of the code, and instead - review the facts alone
and apply to them the correct sections of the code.
C. Public Policy Significance
1. Continued tolerance of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) undermines the rights
of all 10 millions, who reside in Los Angeles County
The complaint holds unique public policy significance, since it again documents how deeply entrenched the
racketeering enterprise is at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – the LA-JR (Alleged
Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). The LA-JR was documented in numerous government, expert, and media
reports: [viii ,ix ]
− At the Civil Division, such conduct is most noticeable in real estate and other types of financial
institutions fraud under the guise of litigation [x ,xi ,xii ]
− In the Criminal Division, such conduct is most noticeable in the large-scale false imprisonments, best
documented in the case of the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – thousands of victims of
the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000), who remain imprisoned. [xiii ,xiv ]
− High-level financial management fraud is inherent to the operations of the LA-JR, and has been
repeatedly documented for over a decade as well. [xv ]
− Particularly noted in this regard are the secret payments by Los Angeles County to the judges of the
Los Angeles Superior Court, and the related false imprisonment of former US prosecutor Richard
Fine, who exposed and rebuked the practice. Richard Fine was held for 18 months in solitary
confinement, under false arrest and booking records, claiming that he was arrested and imprisoned on
location and by authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”. [xvi ]
z Page 4/9 April 8, 2011

− The racket is widespread and well established, is patronized by California and US justice system
agencies, and colludes with law firms and financial institutions large and small, as outlined in a
proposed schematic organizational chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). [xvii ]
It should be noted that the LA-JR today is primarily focused on a white-collar crime, and as such. As noted in
FBI reports over the past decade, such rackets do not operate along the lines of traditional crime organizations,
with strict hierarchy, but more as loosely associated groups of professionals.
2. Denial of public access to valid court records, and the concomitant publication of fraudulent court
records online is inherent to the operations of the courts in California and beyond
The complaint also documents the denial of access to paper and electronic court records – to inspect and to
copy, as a key feature of the racketeering. It was claimed that enforcement of the First Amendment right to
access court records, in and of itself, would paralyze the racket.
Therefore, the complaint claims that continued refusal of the US government to protect the 10 million
residents of the County of Los Angeles, California, against racketeering by judges amounts to serious
violation of Human Rights in the United States.
3. Racketeering in the courts by Bank of America undermines the integrity and stability of the US
financial system
Evidence of racketeering in the courts by Bank of America, including direct involvement of its President
Brian Moynihan and its former Associate General Counsel Sandor Samuels was repeatedly filed with US law
enforcement in recent years. [xviii ]
During the same years, Bank of America has been the recipient of hundreds of billions of US dollars in bailout
funds from the US tax payer. Continued racketeering by leading US financial institutions undermines the
integrity and stability of the US financial system.
D. The Accused
1. California Judge Peter J Meeka,
2. Clerk of the Court John A Clarke,
3. Brian Moynihan, President, Bank of America,
4. Bank of America Corporation,
5. Attorney Mark Asdourian.
E. General Claims
Conduct of the accused at the Civil Division of the Court in the caption, referenced above, is alleged as
including, but not limited to:
1. Public Corruption;
2. Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law;
3. Honest Services Fraud;
4. Fraud;
5. Mail Fraud;
6. Falsification of Court Records;
7. Conspiracy,
8. Denial of due process of law,
9. Securities Fraud, and
z Page 5/9 April 8, 2011

10. Racketeering.
F. Additional evidence and records are provided in records linked below, in respective court files, and
in complaints previously filed with the office of US Attorney, Los Angeles.
For the sake of brevity, only a small part of the evidence was described and linked below. Please do not
hesitate to contact Dr Zernik for additional evidence in this matter.
Please consider the records (linked below), as integral part of instant complaint, including, but not
limited to the First Amended Complaint filed in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District
Court, Central District of California. [ xix ]
Additional evidence pertaining to instant complaint, which further supports the allegations is held in:
1. Records in the paper court file of Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) at the Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles
2. Records in the electronic court files under the same caption in Sustain – the case management
system of the Court;
Complaints, which were separately filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of California,
pertaining to conduct the courts in Los Angeles County in other cases, all alleged as pretense litigations
of the Court, referenced above and linked below.
G. In Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) the accused engage in pretense litigation in the Superior
Court of California, aimed to deprive Plaintiff Susan Lomas of her Human, Constitutional, and
Civil Rights.
In Lomas v Bank of America(KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights through a Quiet
Title action against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case: [xx ]
1. None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
2. None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
3. Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "off of the record";
4. No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held: It was secretly listed as continued in the
minutes, but falsely listed as conducted in the online “Case Summary”;
5. Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), where
the true registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
6. An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naive reader to
conclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have been entered by the
court.
7. Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate of
Attorney of Record. Attorney Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleading banking records as
"Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.
8. No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was ever filed in the
case.
H. Conduct, documented in instant complaint, is the culmination of efforts by the Courts, lasting
several decades, to ambiguate procedures and records of the Court.
As detailed in previous complaints, the Court has published for decades false and deliberately misleading
Local Rules of Court pertaining to entry of judgment and the maintenance of Judgement Books. Moreover,
z Page 6/9 April 8, 2011

Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court refuse to disclose the true Local Rules of Court
pertaining to such procedures, and to correct the false published Rules.
I. Continued tolerance of racketeering by Bank of America undermines the integrity and stability of
US financial systems [xxi ]
The pattern of racketeering in the state and US courts from coast to coast was established by Countrywide
Financial Corporation (today a subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation), under the tenure of Sandor
Samuels as Chief Legal Officer. It was the same conduct that eventually led to the collapse of Countrywide:
1. In January 2008 - Countrywide Financial Corporation collapsed, following the publication of a report by
the New York Times regarding the filing of "Recreated Letters" as evidence in the US Bankruptcy Court
in Pennsylvania. [xxii ]
2. In March 2008 - The Hon Jeff Bohm entered a Memorandum Opinion in the US Bankruptcy Court in
Texas, referring to a year-long study of the litigation practices of Countrywide in courts across the United
States and documenting various litigation fraud methods employed by the bank and its attorneys, which
were summarized as "disregard for the professional and ethical obligations of the legal profession and
judicial system". (p8) [xxiii ]
3. Following the July 1, 2008 takeover of Countrywide by Bank of America Corporation, such conduct was
stopped, under the tenure of Timothy Mayopoulos as General Counsel of Bank of America.
4. Within 24 hours following the December 10, 2008 ouster of Mr Mayopoulos and his replacement by
Brian Moynihan as General Counsel, such conduct was resumed.
5. In May 2010 - Evidence of racketeering in the courts by Countrywide and BofA, including direct
involvement by Sandor Samuels and Brian Moynihan (BofA President) was filed with US law
enforcement. [iii]
Notice of the Fraud on the Court in instant case was filed with Bank of America President Brian Moynihan
and with the office of General Counsel of Bank of America, as was the case in previous instances.
Both in instant case and in previous instances, Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan took no
action to stop the alleged racketeering.
Ongoing tolerance of racketeering by Bank of America:
− Makes mockery of laws established by the US Congress in effort to restore the integrity of US financial
systems, such as the Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) and the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (2009).
− Highlights the false certifications of no fraud in operations, filed quarterly in SEC reports.
− Highlights the fraud in current bailout by the US government, where Bank of America has been the
recipient of hundreds of billions of US dollars from the US taxpayer.
− Undermines the integrity and stability of the US financial system.
J. Alleged widespread corruption and racketeering in the justice system in Los Angeles is drawing
both national and international awareness.
As part of the first ever review by the United Nations (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, report was
filed by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Dr Joseph Zernik, [xxiv ] alleging widespread corruption of the justice
system in Los Angeles County, California. The report further documented the refusal of senior officers of the
US government to abide by its duties and responsibilities pursuant to ratified international law – in failure to
accord equal protection to the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County. Staff report, which was issued by
the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, consequently noted “corruption of the courts and the legal
profession… in California”. [xxv ]
A Scribd site was created for Human Rights Alert in January 2010, which has recorded over 340,000 reads,
with over 500 reads a day in recent months.[xxvi ] Additional news sites, where Dr Zernik and Human Rights
z Page 7/9 April 8, 2011

Alert routinely issue press releases, attracted tens of thousands of additional readers from over 100 nations.
[xxvii ]
K. Remedies are requested by the US government, including, but not limited to equal protection of all
10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County.
US Attorney, Central District of California, is herein requested to provide the following remedies:
1. Equal protection of the Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights of all 10 millions who reside in Los
Angeles County under US and ratified international law, by putting an end to pretend litigations at the
Los Angeles Superior Court by compelling the Courts to comply with California, US, and ratified
international law.
2. Enforcement of First Amendment rights and US Supreme Court decision in Nixon v Warner
Communications, Inc (1978) in Los Angeles County, California, by compelling the Los Angeles
Superior Court to permit public access – to inspect and to copy court records - including, but not
limited to the Register of Actions, Audit Data in the Registers, and paper court files.
3. Enforcement of Fair Hearings and Due Process rights in Los Angeles County, California, by
compelling the Los Angeles Superior Court to publish honest, valid, and effectual Local Rules of
Court, including, but not limited to rules pertaining to entry of judgment and maintenance of Books of
Judgments, as required by California Civil Code.
4. Investigation and, if necessary, prosecution of Judge Peter Meeka and Clerk John A Clarke and others
named as Accused in instant complaint for public corruption, deprivation of rights under the color of
law, and racketeering. It should be noted that the request in instant complaint for US investigation of
the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, is a repeat of the recommendations of the
official report of the Blue Ribbon Review Panel (2006). [xxviii ]
L. Request for due process in acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints at the US
Attorney Office, Central District of California.
As previously noted, the web pages of the US Attorney Office and information received from staff of the
Office, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that at best a vague and ambiguous procedures were
established at the US Attorney’s Office for acceptance, acknowledgment, and review of complaints at the
newly re-established Public Corruption and Civil Rights unit. It is therefore explicitly requested that the US
Attorney Office, Central District of California, and the Office of Senior Counsel, Access to Justice Initiative
accord due process to instant complaint:
1. That the complaint be accepted as such;
2. That the US Attorney Office acknowledge receipt of the complaint and issue a reference number for
the complaint;
3. That the complaint be duly reviewed, and
4. That following review, a response be provided, verified by an authorized person.
Respectfully,

Dated: April 8, 2011

Joseph Zernik, PhD

By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
z Page 8/9 April 8, 2011

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Phone: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
Email jz12345@earthlink.net

CC:
1. Prof David Burcham – former Dean, Loyola Law School
<david.burcham@lmu.edu>
2. Prof Erwin Chemerinsky – Dean, Irvine Law School
<EChemerinsky@law.uci.edu>
3. Attorney Connie Rice – Los Angeles Advancement Project
<dmcmorris@advanceproj.org>
4. UPR Office of the United Nations
<UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org>
5. UPR Office of the US State Department:
<upr_info@state.gov>
6. The Honorable Dianne Feinstein – Senator from California
7. US Senate and House of Representatives – Judiciary Committees
8. Basel Accord Committee on International Banking
9. SEC
10. Office of Controller of the Currency

LINKS
i
Prof Paul Krugman’s column in the New York Times (2011)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
ii
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
iii
Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
iv
Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
v
10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/H
vi
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
Hhttp://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
vii
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
viii
11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take
Action
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/H
ix
For review of the LA-JR see United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) submission of Human Rights Alert (NGO) as part of the 2010 UPR
(Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States:
1) Press Release:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/H
2) Submission:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/H
3) Appendix:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
4) 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in
the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/H
x
Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Marina v Los Angeles County:
10-07-08 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca for Public Corruption and
Deprivation
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/H
xi
10-08-13 RE: Karimi v Mithawaila (BD518503) - Complaint against Attorney David Pasternak and the Superior Court of California, County of
Los Angeles, for public corruption and racketeering in pretense receiverships at the Court.
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/H
xii
Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Sturgeon v Los Angeles County:
10-07-15 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office Central District of California against Justice James A Richman Presiding Judge Charles McCoy Clerk
John Clarke:
z Page 9/9 April 8, 2011

Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/H
xiii
09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/H
xiv
10-06-28 Human Rights Alert Complaint filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Re Large Scale False Imprisonments in Los Angeles
County s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33647477/H
xv
High-level financial management fraud – see [viii], above.
xvi
10-07-08 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca for Public Corruption and Deprivation
of Rights
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/
xvii
10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/H
xviii
Bank of America – evidence of racketeering
1) 10-05-05 Countrywide Bank of America NYSE BAC and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
2) 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on
Comptroller of the Currency
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/H
3) 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP
Alleging Racketeering
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/H
4) 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Bryan
Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraud s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/H
xix
First Amended Complaint filed in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30766354/
xx
Lomas v Bank of America – Evidence of Racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court:
1) 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles
Superior Court
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/H
2) 11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online “Case Summary”
and Minutes
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/H
3) 11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – Fraud on the Court in a
Quiet Title Action
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/H
4) 11-04-06 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) “Request[s] for Judicial Notice”- Additional Evidence of Fraud on the Court in
Foreclosure Procedure s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52420585/H
5) 11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – Judge Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Benefits
from BofA
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52494342/H
6) 11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Attorney Mark Asdourian’s Authority as
Attorney of Record s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/H
7) 11-04-07 Request for Help by Sandor Samuels, President of Bet Tzedek - "The House of Justice"- in Re Lomas v Bank of America
(KCD59379)-s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52521210/H
8) 11-04-07 PRESS RELEASE: Bet Tzedek – “The House of Justice” – President Sandor Samuels is asked to help in stopping fraud
by Bank of America against a homeowner in the Los Angeles Superior Court
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52525314/H
xxi
Evidence of racketeering by Bank of America – see [xviii], above.
xxii
8-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Countrywide's three "recreated letters",
transcript, and news reports:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/
xxiii
08-03-05Case of Borrower William Parsley(05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation
practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients"
clause:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
xxiv
See [viii], above.
xxv
United Nations HRC Staff Report – see [ix], above.
xxvi
Scribd site of Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
xxvii
News sites where Human Rights Alert posts routine releases:
Hhttp://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345H
Hhttp://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Hhttp://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
xxviii
Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) – see (ii), above.