Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zuber MEMHTA 2011 v1
Zuber MEMHTA 2011 v1
free
Congruent???
role of colleagues and PLN was it real maths? ability to make quick decisions to use technology for lessons bringing the outside world into maths classroom
personal use of GeoGebra effect on the maths conversation and maths exploration focus on the maths, not the technology
overview
1. 2. 3. 4. Is there something different about mathematics? Working mathematically with one-to-one Learning environments Some thoughts for head teachers
one-to-one
one-to-one
teachers not reliant on access to computer labs students can do things with digital tools extend physical classroom to the online space socioeconomic status no longer limits access
Significantly lower levels of use of the laptops in mathematics classrooms as compared to other subjects.
Teachers, students and parents report time spent using laptops for mathematics at half the rate of other subjects.
Large scale longitudinal studies do not show significant improvement in standardised test scores for mathematics.
Bebell & Kay, 2010. Dawson, Cavanaugh, & Ritzhaupt, 2008. Grimes & Warschauer, 2008. Zucker & McGhee, 2005.
one-to-one refers to access to technology, by definition it says nothing about actual education practices
(Bebell & O'Dwyer, 2010, p. 6).
teacher beliefs
teaching practices
Research background
5 comprehensive secondary schools mixed SES groups 24 mathematics teachers, teaching ~600 students with laptops Mixed method study 60,000 words of interview data + 1,800 questionnaire item responses Data collected mid 2010 Masters project at University of Sydney, supervised by Judy Anderson
Count
1 2
3
Adopter Score
.. but this doesnt explain the 50% lower levels of laptop use.
Real maths learning is done with pen-and-paper Learning outcomes are only tangible when seen on paper
Need to show your working out Its hard to write mathematics equations on laptops
Charles Windsor
Teacher belief
+
Mathematics teaching practice Primacy of the exercise book
Reduces mathematics outcomes for low achieving students Only 2 contrary views expressed
Teacher belief
+
Mathematics teaching practice Graded classes High barrier to using laptops in entire mathematics classrooms
Teacher belief
+
Mathematics teaching practice Teacher leads, student follows
Mathematics Teacher beliefs Maths is done on paper Low achieving students cant use laptops Teacher leads, student follows
So what can you do with the laptops? And why would you want to?
one-to-one refers to access to technology, by definition it says nothing about actual education practices
(Bebell & O'Dwyer, 2010, p. 6).
Prepare students in Stage 4 & 5, so they are ready to use during Stage 6.
GeoGebra is a killer app for teaching calculus concepts
high quality content exposition students can explore in their own time, at their own pace:
subscription service
high quality guided skill development, with options for teacher set goals + teacher & parent outcome monitoring:
free
subscription service
subscription service
subscription service
subscription service
Finding problems
free
Vi Hart
How do I find the time? Do students have the skills for this activity? Are students constructing? Concrete sometimes is best done concrete
mathslinks.net
3. learning environments
personal and social competence capability
studentresponsenetwork.com
headset + Jing/Camtasia/Screencast.com
Appears to be a pre-requisite for teachers to engage with laptops Limited budget? Hold off the IWB, buy a data projector for every classroom One per room, fixed installation instantly and always available
Mathematics teachers have valid reasons for not using the laptops - they are motivated by concern for the best learning outcomes for their students.
Non-adopters may hold a strong sense of hurt and feelings of being ridiculed or ignored by their technology-enthusiast colleagues.
Show ways in which laptops are successfully used with lower achieving students Dont dis the textbook CD. Show how using the new tools can help with building resources and demonstrating ideas Small changes can make a big difference encouraging teachers to try out the technology.
closing suggestions
7 6
4
Challenge your beliefs
3
Hook into a learning network
2 1
mathslinks.net
references
Bebell, D., & ODwyer, L.M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), 5-26. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 6-59.
Cavanagh, M. (2006). Mathematics teachers and working mathematically: Responses to curriculum change, in G. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.),Identities, Cultures and Learning Spaces (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) Vol 1, pp. 115-122. Melbourne: MERGA. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP102006.pdf Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2008). Florida's EETT leveraging laptops initiative and its impact on teaching practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 143-159.
Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2007(23), 440452.
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2007). Technology-enriched teaching of secondary mathematics: Factors influencing innovative practice. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice Volume 1, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp.315-324). Wahroonga: MERGA. http://www.merga.net.au/publications/counter.php?pub=pub_conf&id=398
references
Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 305-332. Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, (71)3, 299-317.
Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics using research informed strategies. ACER Report. Retrived October 20 from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/13/ Weston, M.E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(6), 5-25. Retrieved Aug 14, 2011 from http://www.jtla.org.
Zucker, A., & McGhee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico County public schools. Arlington, VA : SRI International.
resources
www.geogebra.org
GeoGebra v4 now available
mathslinks.net
www.edmodo.com edmodoteacherhub.wikispaces.com
nrich.maths.org
www.ncetm.org.uk
studentresponsenetwork.com
http://www.csiro.au/resources/Maths-by-Email.html http://www.csiro.au/resources/MbE-Activity-Archive.html
http://www.jamestanton.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/DrJamesTanton
http://www.gapminder.org/