Professional Documents
Culture Documents
India Cements: Performance Highlights
India Cements: Performance Highlights
India Cements
Performance Highlights
Quarterly results (standalone)
Y/E Mar (` cr) Net revenue Operating profit OPM (%) Reported Net profit
Source: Company, Angel Research
NEUTRAL
CMP Target Price
Investment Period
4QFY12 1,118 218 19.5 65 % chg qoq 7.4 27.6 365bp (4) 1QFY12 1,061 242 22.8 102 % chg yoy 13.2 14.6 27bp (39.2)
`86 -
Stock Info Sector Market Cap (` cr) Net Debt (` cr) Beta 52 Week High / Low Avg. Daily Volume Face Value (`) BSE Sensex Nifty Reuters Code Bloomberg Code Cement 2,636 2,420 1.2 119/62 238,386 10 17,657 5,363 ICMN.BO ICEM@IN
India Cements (ICEM) posted a 13.2% yoy growth in its standalone net revenue to `1,201cr, which was slightly above our estimates. The top-line growth was mainly driven by a 6.9% yoy improvement in cement realization. IPL franchise revenues too rose by a healthy 44% yoy to `122cr. The net profit fell by 39% yoy to `62cr. During the quarter the company had `20cr of exceptional items related to the IPL franchise and `25cr of forex loss which dragged down the profits. Adjusted for the exceptional items, the PAT was down by 10% on a y-o-y basis. OPM up by a marginal 27bp yoy: Cement volumes grew by a marginal 3.2% yoy. The management indicated that it had to forego volume growth to maintain realization levels. Despite the better realization, the OPM rose by a modest 27bp yoy due to increase in freight and power & fuel costs. Per tonne freight costs rose by ~20% on account of a higher diesel cost, fare hike by railways and higher lead distance. Power and fuel costs were higher on account of power tariff hikes in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. Outlook and valuation: We expect ICEM to post a bottom-line CAGR of 14.2% over FY2012-14E. The companys return ratios would remain subdued due to substantial investments in subsidiaries. At the current market price, though the stock is trading at low valuations of EV/tonne of US$62 on FY2014E capacity, we believe this is justified considering the company's unfavorable locational presence. Hence, we maintain our Neutral recommendation on the stock.
Shareholding Pattern (%) Promoters MF / Banks / Indian Fls FII / NRIs / OCBs Indian Public / Others 25.8 17.8 33.7 22.7
3m 10.2 10.0
V Srinivasan
022-39357800 v.srinivasan@angelbroking.com
1,201
30
20
10
OPM (RHS)
Operating performance
During the quarter, ICEM sold 2.38mn tonne of cement, registering a 3.2% yoy growth. The management indicated that it had to forego volume growth to maintain realization levels. Net realization improved substantially by 6.9% yoy to `4,460/tonne, aided by demand pick-up in south India which rose by 9% on a yo-y basis albeit on a low base. Importantly, the net plant realization (NPR) rose by 5.5% yoy to `3,549/tonne. Even on a sequential basis, the NPR rose by 2.4% on a y-o-y basis. The company has bought a ship at a cost of US$16mn. Raw-material cost per tonne rose by 4% yoy to `572. Power and fuel cost per tonne stood at `1,209, up 16.9% yoy. Power and fuel costs increased on account of increase in power tariffs in both Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Freight cost per tonne rose by 19.0% yoy to `935 due to increased costs of petroleum products, higher railway freight charges and higher lead distance. The operating profit per tonne of cement stood flat at `1,035 on y-o-y basis. However, it rose by 21.5% on a q-o-q basis.
ICEMs subsidiary, Trinetra Cement (Trinetra) dispatched 0.27mn tonne of cement in 1QFY2013 as against 0.22mn tonne in 1QFY2012.
Recommendation rationale
Worst plant locations compared to all companies in our coverage universe: About 93% of ICEMs consolidated total capacity is located in Tamil Nadu (TN), Andhra Pradesh (AP) and Rajasthan. As per our estimates, for FY2013E, the capacity situation in TN is expected to be slightly better than the other two, as a large part of its excess of 18.1mt can be supplied to Kerala (where the total deficit is expected to be 8.6mt). However, AP is expected to have India's highest indigenous demand supply gap (42mt) and no nearby supply-deficit state to sell its excess more economically than other states. Further, Rajasthan's net demand supply gap is expected to be huge at 16.4mt, even after factoring in supplies of 16.6mt to nearby supply-deficit states (Punjab, Haryana, Chandigarh, NCR and Uttar Pradesh). Capacities in all these states are expected to witness prolonged utilization and margin pressures.
FY2013E Revised 4,393 3,546 848 265 310 414 124 310 Var (%) 0.7 0.1 3.1 (0.0) (0.3) 2.2 2.2 4.2 Earlier 4,791 3,878 913 278 306 499 150 349 4,364 3,541 822 265 311 405 121 297
FY2014E Revised 4,914 3,957 957 278 292 558 168 391 Var (%) 2.6 2.0 4.8 (0.0) (4.5) 11.9 11.9 11.9
FY14E 14.1 8 2
14.1 6 1
$40
$60
$80
$100
Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: *Y/E December; ^ Computed on TTM basis
Company Background
India Cements is the largest cement company in south India, with a capacity of 13mtpa spread across four plants each in TN and AP. The company also has a plant at Parli in Maharashtra (1.1mtpa). It has recently commissioned a plant of 1.5mtpa capacity at Banswara in Rajasthan through its subsidiary, Trinetra Cement, thereby taking its consolidated capacity to 15.6mtpa. The company also bought franchise rights of IPL team, Chennai Super Kings, for ten years in 2008 for US$91mn.
Note: Some of the figures from FY2011 onwards are reclassified; hence not comparable with previous year numbers
Key ratios
Y/E March Valuation Ratio (x) P/E (on FDEPS) P/CEPS P/BV Dividend yield (%) EV/Sales EV/EBITDA EV / Total Assets Per Share Data (`) EPS (Basic) EPS (fully diluted) Cash EPS DPS Book Value Dupont Analysis (%) EBIT margin Tax retention ratio Asset turnover (x) ROIC (Post-tax) Cost of Debt (Post Tax) Leverage (x) Operating ROE Returns (%) ROCE (Pre-tax) Angel ROIC (Pre-tax) ROE Turnover ratios (x) Asset Turnover (Gross Block) Inventory / Sales (days) Receivables (days) Payables (days) WC cycle (ex-cash) (days) Solvency ratios (x) Net debt to equity Net debt to EBITDA Interest Coverage (EBIT / Int.) 0.5 2.0 6.5 0.5 2.8 3.6 0.4 5.1 0.7 0.6 2.9 1.8 0.6 2.8 1.9 0.5 2.4 2.3 0.7 38 36 160 89 0.7 40 30 136 121 0.6 50 27 124 221 0.7 46 21 103 219 0.7 45 18 64 209 0.7 45 18 43 204 12.9 15.7 18.4 8.2 9.6 9.7 1.6 1.7 1.2 7.4 7.7 8.6 7.7 7.9 8.8 8.7 8.9 10.6 21.6 66.6 0.6 9.0 3.9 0.5 11.8 13.8 66.7 0.6 5.5 4.6 0.5 6.0 3.1 75.8 0.5 1.2 5.4 0.5 (0.8) 13.0 77.1 0.6 5.7 10.8 0.5 3.2 13.3 70.0 0.6 5.4 9.2 0.6 3.2 13.8 70.0 0.6 6.1 8.5 0.6 4.8 18.1 18.1 22.5 2.3 105.0 10.1 10.1 19.1 2.3 113.0 1.3 1.3 10.2 1.7 113.4 9.8 9.8 17.8 4.8 112.6 10.1 10.1 18.1 4.7 117.4 12.7 12.7 21.8 6.4 123.7 4.7 3.8 0.8 2.7 1.0 3.8 0.6 8.5 4.5 0.8 2.7 1.1 5.3 0.6 65.8 8.4 0.8 2.0 1.2 11.7 0.6 8.8 4.8 0.8 5.6 1.2 6.1 0.6 8.5 4.8 0.7 5.5 1.1 5.8 0.6 6.7 3.9 0.7 7.4 1.0 5.3 0.6 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013E FY2014E
E-mail: research@angelbroking.com
Website: www.angelbroking.com
DISCLAIMER
This document is solely for the personal information of the recipient, and must not be singularly used as the basis of any investment decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial advice. Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of the companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult their own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. Angel Broking Limited, its affiliates, directors, its proprietary trading and investment businesses may, from time to time, make investment decisions that are inconsistent with or contradictory to the recommendations expressed herein. The views contained in this document are those of the analyst, and the company may or may not subscribe to all the views expressed within. Reports based on technical and derivative analysis center on studying charts of a stock's price movement, outstanding positions and trading volume, as opposed to focusing on a company's fundamentals and, as such, may not match with a report on a company's fundamentals. The information in this document has been printed on the basis of publicly available information, internal data and other reliable sources believed to be true, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied on as such, as this document is for general guidance only. Angel Broking Limited or any of its affiliates/ group companies shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. Angel Broking Limited has not independently verified all the information contained within this document. Accordingly, we cannot testify, nor make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to the accuracy, contents or data contained within this document. While Angel Broking Limited endeavours to update on a reasonable basis the information discussed in this material, there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons that prevent us from doing so. This document is being supplied to you solely for your information, and its contents, information or data may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may seek to provide or have engaged in providing corporate finance, investment banking or other advisory services in a merger or specific transaction to the companies referred to in this report, as on the date of this report or in the past. Neither Angel Broking Limited, nor its directors, employees or affiliates shall be liable for any loss or damage that may arise from or in connection with the use of this information. Note: Please refer to the important `Stock Holding Disclosure' report on the Angel website (Research Section). Also, please refer to the latest update on respective stocks for the disclosure status in respect of those stocks. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may have investment positions in the stocks recommended in this report.
Disclosure of Interest Statement 1. Analyst ownership of the stock 2. Angel and its Group companies ownership of the stock 3. Angel and its Group companies' Directors ownership of the stock 4. Broking relationship with company covered
India Cements No No No No
Note: We have not considered any Exposure below ` 1 lakh for Angel, its Group companies and Directors
Ratings (Returns):
10