Judge Mark S. Coven February 25", 2005 c/o Arthur H. Tobin and Alice Paccioretti, Quincy District Court One Dennis F. Ryan Parkway Quincy, MA 02169 RE: Quincy District Docket # 200456CV00239 and Dorchester District Court Docket # 0407CRO04623 Dear Judge Coven, This is a request for a continuance of the malicious action against my family by Morgan Stanley's iegal Counsel until the pending criminal trial of my husband, David R. Amos is over. T am writing this letter to you because various clerks in Quincy Court have demanded that I do so after trying to argue my husband for months as to why he cannot speak in this matter. He has freely admitted to Morgan Stanley's various lawyers that he is responsible for our common debts under M.G.L. 209, The debts were incurred in support of our family. In fact the funds were largely used to finance the defence of our civil rights, our property and my interests in various inheritances. My husband has his own Discover Card. It has had no problem harassing me at my place of employment about my husband's debt to Discover Bank. It must also recognize his common interest in mine. We also share other cards with various other bankers associated with Morgan Stanley. Furthermore my husband had tried to resolve our concerns with Morgan Stanley before we were unable to continue to honour our debts and before he ran for Parliament. We do not consider it a coincidence that a coworker of my brother served me this complaint less than a day before my husband was faisely imprisoned For a period almost six months beginning on September 8", 2004 and three weeks before he went to jail, my husband conferred with the people acting on behalf of Morgan Stanley in the above stated matter and received a response. After receiving my answer the lawyers within the law firm of Howard Lee Schiff finally recognized my Durable Power of Attorney and the rights within it yet have falsely claimed that my husband created some sort of “cease and desist order’ and refused to speak to him, However they demand that I answer their questions without ever answering the ones we made to their associates many months before they filed this malicious complaint. My husband plans to call several people employed within Quincy District Court to testify in his defence during the course of his pending criminal trial. I must remain silent in order to protect his freedom and the civil rights and interests of my family. Some of the evidence he will employ in his defence involves various lawyers employed by Morgan Stanley. We truly believe that this action within this court is part of a criminal conspiracy against us to stop our legal actions, Federal Law Enforcement Authorities wanted my husband to keep things confidential for years. However once he was falsely imprisoned without due process of law and held under the strange charges of "other", my husband will employ all of his resources and civil rights to see that justice is servedOne of the people my husband plans to call to testify during the course of his criminal trial is you, Judge Coven and the unnamed Assistant District Attorney employed in Quincy District Court that received much evidence of many crimes including some of the original Police Surveillance tapes that will be argued during the course of his criminal trial. You have failed to give my husband the simple courtesy of responding to the letter and material he sent to you long ago by confirmed US Mail but at least you have not denied his allegations. He has every right to call you and ask why you did not uphold the law and the public trust. As a judge of a Massachusetts Trial Court you should not have any sort of immunity from testifying in a man's defence of his freedom brought on but an illegal complaint filed by a clerk of another District Court. You above all others should understand the following: Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court 439 Mass, 352(2003) “A clerk- magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest,” A copy of my husband's letter to you, my Durable Power of Attorney and the only documentation we ever received from Quincy Court is hereto attached for you to review. We have received copies of the recordings of all our hearings before Quincy District Court in the past and my husband will use them as evidence in his defence during the course of his pending trial. Perhaps you should listen to them as well to refresh your memory of our circumstances. After my husband's criminal trial in front of a jury of his peers is over, he plans to do as he promised and sue you in federal court to seek relief from personal injury. It was you Judge Coven that acknowledged the rights within my Durable Power of Attorney and discussed our matters with my husband on April of 2003. It was you who denied our very justifiable requests for restraining orders against my three brothers William, Robert, and Brian O'Meara for no stated reason whatsoever and we received nothing in writing afterwards as to the reasons for your decision. Your judgement has allowed my criminal brothers to continue to harass us to this very day. If you had not been so willing to assist my brothers in their harassment, our property would not have been stolen and destroyed and my husband definitely would not have been sent to jail because of the false allegations made against him by their lawyer. Furthermore I would not be compelled to send you this letter. You, Judge Coven are an officer of the court who failed to act within the scope of your employment to protect my person, my rights and my interests and compelled my husband to do the best he could to defend us. It is my brothers and their many lawyers who should be criminally prosecuted not my husband and the entire Trial Court System and the politicians within Statehouse of this Commonwealth know it. The reason for the malice is obvious many state employees of this have an interest in the outcome of our matters because of our evidence Bank Fraud against the Brookline Savings Bank and the SEC cover up of the Securities Fraud of Putnam investments alone.Judge Coven if you do not insure that this matter is removed to federal court you should at least continue the matter until after my husband's criminal trial is over because of your personal interest in the outcome of this matter and the charges against my husband were made while he was in Canada running for Parliament. This was before the law firm of Howard Lee Schiff became involved in my matters and this complaint was filed. All of our matters now fall under the jurisdiction of federal courts in the USA and Supreme Courts in Canada and under the related federal codes. Everybody knows it within the federal governments of the USA and Canada and many other states and provinces as well. My husband has made certain of it. It seems that the RCMP, the SEC, the IRS, the DHS and the FBI all seem to forget that Canadians buy and sell on the American stock markets as well. To put it simply my husband is a political prisoner for the benefit of cross border public corruption. He will do his level best to prove it in an ethical and legal fashion in defence of his freedom and your own civil rights as well, I did not want to come to Quincy Court today as ordered by you Judge Coven. I do not wish to speak to anyone as is my right for the very same reason my husband first attempted to file restraining orders on my behalf years ago. I have had enough of the Commonwealth's malice toward me and my family, I am still suffering from the nervous breakdown caused by my brothers and others years ago. Although T am back at work, T om still on the same medication and refuse to speak or discuss my matter with anyone. That is the reason we must employ my Durable Power of Attorney to protect my rights ond interests, The Norfolk Probate Court went further in their malice towards us and denied my Conservatorship Petition because Judge Harms stated she did not believe the sworn statements of my doctors. The appeal was maliciously delayed for years and denied while my husband was jailed. I had to be the one to come today because we suspect more foul play against my husband if he had chosen to accompany me after all your clerks had warned him away. Whereas he is merely out of jail on bail we cannot afford to take chances with his freedom and subject him to further malice from the clerks in Massachusetts. Therefore he wrote this letter. I proofread it, agree with it and signed it. My husband also signed it pursuant to my Durable Power of Attorney and admits to the common debt. Our friend delivered it upon your office and whatever lawyer appears on behalf of Morgan Stanley. I witness this being done and say nothing. Tf you have any questions about the statements within this letter please confer with Attorney General Reilly, or the Suffolk County District Attorney or Attorney General Gonzales or Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan. Both my husband and I are asserting our Constitutional Rights to remain silent and seek trials by juries of our peers, We do not wish to discuss our matters with malicious lawyers when it is not properly recorded in the public record, Anything we say we have no doubt will be used against us.