Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Result and Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    AhmadFikri DotMpeg
    The document contains results from experiments on heat transfer using parallel and counter flow configurations. For parallel flow at 1000 cm3/min, the hot fluid emitted 822.2W, the cold fluid absorbed 693.88W, resulting in a power loss of 128.32W and efficiency of 84.39%. The log mean temperature difference was calculated to be 22.17°C and the overall heat transfer coefficient was determined to be 1074.52 W/m2.°C. Tables of temperature and heat transfer data are provided for both parallel and counter flow configurations across a range of flow rates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Result and Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    AhmadFikri DotMpeg
    15 views4 pages
    The document contains results from experiments on heat transfer using parallel and counter flow configurations. For parallel flow at 1000 cm3/min, the hot fluid emitted 822.2W, the cold fluid absorbed 693.88W, resulting in a power loss of 128.32W and efficiency of 84.39%. The log mean temperature difference was calculated to be 22.17°C and the overall heat transfer coefficient was determined to be 1074.52 W/m2.°C. Tables of temperature and heat transfer data are provided for both parallel and counter flow configurations across a range of flow rates.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains results from experiments on heat transfer using parallel and counter flow configurations. For parallel flow at 1000 cm3/min, the hot fluid emitted 822.2W, the cold fluid absorbed 693.88W, resulting in a power loss of 128.32W and efficiency of 84.39%. The log mean temperature difference was calculated to be 22.17°C and the overall heat transfer coefficient was determined to be 1074.52 W/m2.°C. Tables of temperature and heat transfer data are provided for both parallel and counter flow configurations across a range of flow rates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views4 pages

    Result and Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    AhmadFikri DotMpeg
    The document contains results from experiments on heat transfer using parallel and counter flow configurations. For parallel flow at 1000 cm3/min, the hot fluid emitted 822.2W, the cold fluid absorbed 693.88W, resulting in a power loss of 128.32W and efficiency of 84.39%. The log mean temperature difference was calculated to be 22.17°C and the overall heat transfer coefficient was determined to be 1074.52 W/m2.°C. Tables of temperature and heat transfer data are provided for both parallel and counter flow configurations across a range of flow rates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    RESULT AND DATA ANALYSIS

    For Parallel-Flow:
    Table 1
    Vh

    Th,in

    Th,mid

    Th,out

    Tc,in

    Tc,mid

    Tc,out

    (cm3/min)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    1000

    59.5

    52.0

    47.5

    30.0

    33.5

    35.0

    2000

    59.5

    54.5

    51.0

    30.0

    34.5

    37.5

    3000

    59.5

    56.5

    52.5

    30.0

    35.5

    39.0

    4000

    59.5

    56.0

    54.0

    30.0

    36.5

    40.0

    Table 2
    Vh

    Power

    (cm3/min
    )

    Emitted

    1000

    822.20

    2000

    Power

    Power

    Efficiency

    Lost

    (W)

    693.88

    1164.78

    3000
    4000

    T
    m

    T1

    T2

    (%)

    (C
    )

    (C
    )

    128.32

    84.39

    24.5

    17.5

    20.8

    497.9

    1040.82

    123.96

    89.36

    22.0

    21.0

    21.5

    722.54

    1438.85

    1248.98

    189.87

    86.8

    22.5

    22.5

    21.5

    867.05

    1507.36

    1387.76

    119.6

    92.1

    24.0

    24.0

    21.7

    954.51

    (W)

    Absorb
    ed
    (W)

    (C
    )

    U
    (Wm2.
    C)

    For Counter-Flow:
    Table 1
    Vh

    Th,in

    Th,mid

    Th,out

    Tc,in

    Tc,mid

    Tc,out

    (cm3/min)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    (C)

    1000

    59.5

    53.0

    47.0

    29.0

    32.0

    30.5

    2000

    59.5

    55.0

    50.0

    29.0

    33.5

    37.5

    3000

    59.5

    56.0

    52.5

    29.0

    34.5

    39.5

    4000

    59.5

    57.0

    53.5

    29.0

    35.0

    40.0

    Table 2
    Vh

    Power

    (cm3/min
    )

    Emitted

    1000

    856.46

    2000

    Power

    Power

    Efficiency

    Lost

    (W)

    208.21

    1301.81

    3000
    4000

    T1

    T2

    (%)

    (
    C)

    (
    C)

    (C)

    (Wm2.
    C)

    648.25

    24.31

    29.0

    18.0

    23.06

    134.76

    1179.83

    121.98

    90.63

    22.0

    21.0

    21.5

    819.04

    1438.85

    1457.44

    -18.59

    101.29

    20.0

    23.5

    21.7

    1002.43

    1644.4

    1526.84

    117.56

    92.85

    19.5

    24.5

    21.9

    1040.58

    Absorb
    ed

    (W)

    (W)

    SAMPLE CALCULATION
    Note:

    Tm

    The liquid properties refer table A-3 Properties of Saturated Water

    This calculation Parallel flow and counter flow has been taken the data cold
    2000cm3/min water and 1000 cm3/min hot water volume flow rate.

    For Parallel-Flow:
    (Data taken when Vh=1000 cm3/min)

    Power emitted:

    Vh=1000 cm3/min=1000cm31min1min60s1m3(1106)cm3=1.667105 m/ s
    Power emitted = VhhCp,h(Th,in-Th,out)
    =(5.010-5 )( 983.49)( 4.18 )( 35.0-30.0)
    =822.2 W

    Power absorbed:

    Vc=2000 cm3/min=2000cm31min1min60s1m3(1106)cm3=3.333105 m/ s
    Power absorbed = VccCp,c(Tc,out-Tc,in)
    = (3.33310-5)( 996.0 ) (4.18 )(59.5-47.5)
    =693.88 W

    Power lost:

    Power lost=Power emitted-Power absorbed


    =822.2-693.88
    =128.32 W

    Overall efficiency, :

    =Power AbsorbedPower Emitted100%


    =693.88822.2100%
    =84.39 %

    Logaritmic mean temperature difference, Tm:

    T1= Th,in-Tc.out
    =59.5-35.0
    = 24.5 C

    T2 = Th.out-Tc,in
    =53-28.5
    =24.5
    C

    Tm=T1-T2lnT1T2
    =20-24.5ln2024.5
    =22.17 C

    Overall heat transfer coefficient:

    U = Power absorbedAsTm
    =1596.08 (0.067)(22.17)
    = 1074.52 W/m2. C

    You might also like