Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oceanic Thermal Energy Conversions: Amal Mandal
Oceanic Thermal Energy Conversions: Amal Mandal
Oceanic Thermal Energy Conversions: Amal Mandal
Background Information
OTEC system is based
on the Rankine Cycle Uses the vertical temperature gradient in the ocean as a heat sink/source Mainly used in equatorial waters where temperature gradient is greatest
Closed
carnot 1 TL TH q out q in
h3 h2
h3 h4 h4 h1
rankine 1
Pros of OTEC
Extremely benign impact on environment No dependency on oil Minimal maintenance costs compared to conventional
power production plants Government cannot tax OTEC plants that are off-shore. Provide air conditioning to buildings within the OTEC plant Open cycle OTEC systems can produce desalinated water which is very important in third-world countries
Cons of OTEC
Low thermal efficiency due to small temperature
gradient between heat sink and source Available only in equatorial waters Only moderate power outputs are available Currently this technology is not as monetarily feasible as conventional power production plants The manufacturing and installation of the extremely long cold water pipes is extremely time consuming and costly.
Problem Statement
To create and design an operating Oceanic
Thermal Energy Conversion model that employs a closed Rankine Cycle that utilizes ammonia as the working fluid to illustrate the viability.
Specifications
Produce 100 Watts of power Be smaller than 8 ft. wide, 6 ft. tall, and 2 ft.
deep. Final product must be easily portable. OTEC model must be aesthetically pleasing and allow viewers to easily understand and view the inner-workings of the Rankine Cycle utilized by OTEC systems. Must start and stop operation using simple mechanical or electrical devices Must not endanger the operator or anyone viewing the OTEC presentation
exchangers for effective heat transfer between the ammonia and the heat sink/sources
Conclusion