Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB

SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH


Sh. Bakhtar Singh, S/o Sh. Dyal Singh, R/o Khadar Bhandar Wali Chowk, Bathinda. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Pb, Chandigarh. ..Respondent CC No. 2586 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) Sh. Bakhtar Singh, the Complainant (ii) Sh. Ashok Kumar, Suptd-cum-APIO on behalf of the Respondent.

Complainant states that he filed an application for information on 24.07.2012, but

after the lapse of three months no information has been provided to him. Respondent states that this information is to be provided by Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. Assistant. Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. Assistant, Sh. Rajiv Kumar, Sr. Assistant and Sh. Ashok Kumar, Suptd., are directed to appear before the Commission on the next date of hearing alongwith the complete information as sought by the Complainant in his RTI application, failing which action under Section 20(i) of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 24.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012 CC:

Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. Assistant, Branch-2, Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Pb, Mini Sectt., Sector:09, Chandigarh.

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Ram Kishan, S/o Sh. Nanak Chand, R/o Kahanpur Khuhi, Tehsil:Anandpur Sahib, Distt:Ropar. .Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o SDO, PWD, B&R, Anandpur Sahib, Distt:Roopnagar. First Appellate Authority, O/o Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle, PWD, B&R, Pb. Chandigarh. ..Respondent AC No. 1225 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

: (i) Sh. Ram Kishan, the Appellant (ii) Sh. Ashok Kumar, SDE on behalf of the Respondent

Respondent has brought the information today in the Commission which is

handed over to the Appellant. Appellant states that he is not satisfied with the information provided. Respondent is directed to provide the complete information to the Appellant before the next date of hearing failing which action under Section 20 of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 24.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Smt. Gursimran Kaur, Journalist, R/o 4113/2, Jyoti Colony, Jamalpur Awana. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority, (GLADA) Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana. ..Respondent CC No. 2592 of 2012

Present : ORDER Heard 2. 3.

(i) None is present on behalf of the Complainant (ii) Sh. Ravinder Kumar, APIO-cum-AEO on behalf of the Respondent

Respondent states that the complete information has already been sent to the On the request of the Complainant, the case is 24.12.2012 (11.00 AM). Copies of

Complainant. Complainant is absent. She has requested for another date to state her case. the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Charanjit Singh, Panch Gram Panchayat, R/o Village: Dalewal, Tehsil:Garhshankar, Distt:Hoshiarpur. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Director, Rural Development & Panchayat, Sector:62, Pb, Mohali. ..Respondent CC No. 2588 of 2012

Present ORDER

: None for the parties.

The perusal of the file shows that the information as sought by the Complainant has already been sent to the Complainant. Today, neither the Complainant nor the Respondent is present. The Complainant was not present even on the last date of hearing. Last opportunity is given to the Complainant to appear before the Commission. It is made clear that in case the Complainant does not appear on the next date of hearing, appropriate order in his absence shall be passed. 2. Adjourned to 18.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order be sent tot eh parties Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Amar Dass Mann, S/o Sh. Sampuran Singh, R/o Village. Dharampura, Tehsil Abohar, Distt: Fazilka. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Director, Health & Family Welfare, Pb, Sector:34/A, Chandigarh. ..Respondent CC No. 2587 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) Sh. Amar Dass Mann, the Complainant (ii) Sh. Jasvir Singh, Sr. Assistant on behalf of the Respondent

Respondent states that the complete information has already been sent to the

Complainant. Complainant states that he has not received the inforamtion so far. Respondent is directed to provide complete information to the Complainant before the next date of hearing under intimation to the Commission failing which action under Section 20 of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 24.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, # 19891, Bibi Wala Road, Street No.6, Bathinda. .Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda. First Appellate Authority, O/o Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda. ..Respondent AC No. 1223 of 2012

Present

(i) None is present on behalf of the Appellant (ii) Sh. Maghi Ram, Jr. Assistant on behalf of the Respondent, and Sh. Rajan Bansal, Advocate on behalf of St. Joseph Convent School, Bathinda.

ORDER Heard 2. Respondent states that the sought for information has already been given to the

Appellant and has shown the acknowledgment given by the Appellant in token of having received the information. 3. In view of the above, no further cause of action is left and the case is disposed of and closed. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, # 19891, Bibi Wala Road, Street No.6, Bathinda. .Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda. First Appellate Authority, O/o Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda. ..Respondent AC No. 1224 of 2012

Present

(i) None is present on behalf of the Appellant (ii) (ii) Sh. Maghi Ram, Jr. Assistant on behalf of the Respondent, and Sh. Rajan Bansal, Advocate on behalf of St. Xavier Convent School, Bathinda. .

ORDER Heard 2. Respondent states that the sought for information has already been given to the

Appellant and has shown the acknowledgment given by the Appellant in token of having received the information. 3. In view of the above, no further cause of action is left and the case is disposed of and closed. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Harmanjit Singh Deol, R/o H.No.13/89, Guru Angad Nagar, Sohian Road, Sangrur. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Local Self Government, SCO:131-132, Sector:17/C, Chandigarh. ..Respondent CC No. 2833 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) None is present on behalf of the Complainant (ii) Sh. Paramjit Singh, APIO on behalf of the Respondent.

Sh. Paramjit Singh, Suptd.,-cum-APIO appearing on behalf of the LG-Branch/4

states that information of Sh. Baldev Raj Verma and Sh. Tilak Raj has been provided to the Complainant and remaining information of Sh. Kuldeep Verma is to be provided by the PIO of LG Branch-3 and they have written to them in this regard. PIO of LG Branch3 is directed to provide the remaining information to the Complainant before the next date of hearing, failing which action under Section 20(i) of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 12.12.2012 (11.00AM) for confirmation of compliance. Copies of Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner the order be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

CC: Public Information Officer, Local Govt., Branch-3, SCO:131-132, Sector:17/C, Chandigarh.

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Jagmohan Saggar, #1375/1, St No.30, Janta Nagar, Ludhiana. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Estate Officer, (GLADA) PUDA Office Complex, Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana. ..Respondent CC No. 2843 of 2012 ALONGWITH CC No. 2850 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) Sh. Jagmohan Saggar, the Complainant (ii) Sh. RAvinder Kumar, APIO on behalf of the Respondent.

Complainant states that he filed an application for information on 16.08.2012, but

after the lapse of more than two years, no information has been provided to him. Respondent states that some more time be given to him to provide the complete information to the Complainant as sought by him. Respondent is directed to provide the complete information to the Complainant before the next date of hearing, failing which action under Section 20(i) of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 24.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. M.S.Samra, H.No.488, Sector:20/A, Chandigarh. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, Mohali 160 062 ..Respondent CC No. 2809 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) Sh. M.S. Samra, the Complainant (ii) Sh. Jaspal Singh, Suptd. on behalf of the Respondent

All the points have been discussed in the Commission today in the presence of the

Respondent and Complainant. Respondent has agreed to provide complete information before the next date of hearing failing which action under Section 20 of the RTI Act 2005 will be initiated. 3. Adjourned to 24.12.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. N.K.Sayal, Accountants Officer, Retd, Member RTI Activist Fed. Pb, Sayal Street, Sirhind. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Principal Secretary., Local Govt., Pb. Civil Sectt No.2, Sector: 9, Chandigarh. ..Respondent CC No. 2874 of 2012

Present :

(i) Sh. N.K.Sayal, the Complainant (ii) Sh. Chhotta Lal, APIO on behalf of the Respondent

ORDER Heard 2. All the points have been discussed in the Commission today in the presence of the

Respondent and Complainant. Respondent has agreed to provide complete information to the Complainant before the next date of hearing. 3. Adjourned to 29.11.2012 (11.00AM) for further proceedings. Copies of the order Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Dharam Singh, H.No.HM-419, Phase-VII, SAS Nagar, Mohali. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Director, Local Govt., Pb, Sector:17, Chandigarh. ..Respondent CC No. 2858 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

(i) Sh. Dharam Singh, the Complainant (ii) Sh. Harish Kumar, Accountant on behalf of the Respondent.

Respondent states that the sought for information has already been provided to the

Complainant. Complainant states that he has received the same and is satisfied with the information provided. 3. In view of the above, no further cause of action is left and the case is disposed of and closed. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Harmanjit Singh Deol, R/o H.No.13/89, Guru Angad Nagar, Sohian Road, Sangrur. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Executive Engineer, PWD, B&R, Provincial Division, Ludhiana. ..Respondent CC No. 2840 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

: (i) None is present on behalf of the Complainant (ii) Sh. Taranjit Singh Arora , SDE on behalf of the Respondent

Respondent states that the information has already been sent to the

Complainant. Complainant is absent. He has not informed the Commission about his absence for todays hearing. Copy of the information as submitted by the Respondent today in the Commission be sent to the Complainant alongwith the order. Complainant is advised to point out the deficiencies in the information provided by the Respondent within one week. Respondent is directed to ensure that the deficiencies in the information are made good before the next date of hearing. 3. Adjourned to 12.12.2012 (11.00AM) for confirmation of compliance. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Sanjeev Kuamr, S/o Sh. Ved Parkash, C/o Ved Enterprises, Sato Wala Pul, Dhuri .Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Punjab Mini Sectt. Chandigarh First Appellate Authority O/o Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Punjab Mini Sectt. Chandigarh ..Respondent AC No. 1319 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2. 3.

(i) None is present on behalf of the Appellant (ii) Sh. Chhotta Lal, APIO on behalf of the Respondent

Appellant has informed on telephone that he is unable to attend todays hearing On the request of the Appellant, the case is adjourned to 18.12.2012 (11.00 AM).

and has requested for another date. Copies of the order be sent to the parties. Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

Dated: 8th November, 2012

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB


SCO No. 32-33-34, Sector-17-C, CHANDIGARH
Sh. Tarsem Jindal, Neeli Chattri Wala, S/o Sh. Kastoor Chand, R/o Kothi NO.306, Aastha Enclave, Barnala. .Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer O/o Patiala Development Authority, Patiala. ..Respondent CC No. 2851 of 2012

Present ORDER Heard 2.

: (i) None is present on behalf of the Complainant (ii) Smt. Jaspal Kaur, Sr. Assistant on behalf of the Respondent

Respondent states that the complete information has already been sent to the

Complainant by registered post. Complainant is absent. He has not informed the Commission about his absence for todays hearing. It is presumed that he is satisfied with the information provided. Copy of the information as submitted by the Respondent today in the Commission be sent to the Complainant alongwith the order. 3. In view of the above, no further cause of action is left and the complaint is closed and disposed of. Copies of the order be sent to the parties.

Dated: 8th November, 2012

Sd/(Harinder Pal Singh Mann) State Information Commissioner

You might also like