Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Maintenance Performance 2012

    Uploaded by

    Anbuselvan Palani
    15 views3 pages
    The document reports maintenance performance data for February 2012. It shows that the overall maintenance breakdown percentage for the total plant was 4.21%. The machining cell had the highest percentage at 7.99%, while assembly was the lowest at 2.05%. For the CHM cell, CHM 3 had the highest percentage of breakdowns at 11.72%, while CHM 5 was also high at 9.78%.

    Original Description:

    Maintenance Performance 2012

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document reports maintenance performance data for February 2012. It shows that the overall maintenance breakdown percentage for the total plant was 4.21%. The machining cell had the highest percentage at 7.99%, while assembly was the lowest at 2.05%. For the CHM cell, CHM 3 had the highest percentage of breakdowns at 11.72%, while CHM 5 was also high at 9.78%.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    15 views3 pages

    Maintenance Performance 2012

    Uploaded by

    Anbuselvan Palani
    The document reports maintenance performance data for February 2012. It shows that the overall maintenance breakdown percentage for the total plant was 4.21%. The machining cell had the highest percentage at 7.99%, while assembly was the lowest at 2.05%. For the CHM cell, CHM 3 had the highest percentage of breakdowns at 11.72%, while CHM 5 was also high at 9.78%.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Maintenance performance- Febuary2012

    OVERALL

    MACHINING CELLS

    TOTAL PLANT4.21

    MACHINING7.99

    CCM- 6.7

    MCM- 9.1

    SHOX- 2.59

    ASSY- 2.05

    CHM- 11.7

    CHM CELL
    SL.NO

    CHM 1- 4.61

    CHM 6- 8.64

    CHM 2 -4.68

    CHM 3- 11.72

    CHM 5- 9.78

    CHM 4, 7.48

    DATE

    MACHINE

    PROBLEM

    IMMEDIATE
    ACTION

    ROOT CAUSE

    PREVENTIVE
    ACTION

    2012 BD%
    MONTHS

    MACHINING

    ASSY

    SHOX

    JAN
    FEB
    MAR
    APR
    MAY
    JUN
    JUL
    AUG
    SEP
    OCT
    NOV
    DEC
    Total
    Average

    9.75
    7.99
    5.3
    9.37
    10.14
    9.18
    7.88
    8.6
    9.28

    1.87
    2.05
    1.65
    0.99
    1.02
    1.15
    0.93
    1.39
    1.24

    4.4
    2.59
    1.67
    1.89
    1.93
    2.05
    4.04
    1.42
    1.8

    74.49
    8.28

    12.29
    1.37

    21.79
    3.63

    MONTHS

    MCM

    CHM

    CCM

    11.6
    9.1
    4.7
    4.5
    7.5
    6.4
    5.2
    5.5
    7.9

    13.8
    11.7
    8.4
    18.1
    16.1
    17.7
    12.5
    14.6
    16.4

    8.5
    6.7
    6.7
    10.5
    13.6
    10.2
    12.5
    13.8
    6.2

    MACHINING CELL
    JAN
    FEB
    MAR
    APR
    MAY
    JUN
    JUL
    AUG
    SEP
    OCT
    NOV
    DEC
    Total
    Average

    TOTAL PLANT

    5.34
    4.21
    2.87
    4.08
    4.36
    4.13
    4.28
    3.80
    4.11
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    36.19
    4.42

    Maintenance performance- January 2012

    OVERALL

    MACHINING CELLS

    TOTAL PLANT5.34

    CCM- 8.5

    MCM-11.6
    MACHINING9.75

    SHOX- 4.4

    CHM-13.8

    ASSY- 1.87

    CHM CELL
    SL.NO

    CHM 6- 7.7

    CHM 1- 5.4
    CHM 2- 7.8

    CHM 3- 11.5

    CHM 5- 15.3
    CHM 4- 7.3

    DATE

    MACHINE

    PROBLEM

    IMMEDIATE
    ACTION

    ROOT CAUSE

    PREVENTIVE
    ACTION

    You might also like