Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance of Schools in The January 2013 Pharmacist Licensure Examination
Performance of Schools in The January 2013 Pharmacist Licensure Examination
Performance of Schools in The January 2013 Pharmacist Licensure Examination
17
REPEATERS
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
%
%
%
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED
PASSED PASSED FAILED TOTAL PASSED
100.00%
0.00%
17
20
85.00%
0.00%
12
50.00%
13
46.15%
50.00%
0.00%
16.67%
0.00%
20.00%
16.67%
0.00%
50.00%
50.00%
0.00%
25.00%
16.67%
0.00%
57.14%
12
33.33%
29
17
46
63.04%
19
31
50
38.00%
48
48
96
50.00%
80.00%
50.00%
66.67%
13
69.23%
0.00%
14
64.29%
50.00%
13
19
31.58%
16
25
36.00%
12
29
41
29.27%
10
15
33.33%
17
39
56
30.36%
100.00%
10
13
23.08%
10
14
28.57%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
22.22%
40.00%
10
14
28.57%
10
10
100.00%
0.00%
10
10
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
100.00%
49
56
87.50%
33.33%
51
11
62
82.26%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
23
20
43
53.49%
12
15
20.00%
26
32
58
44.83%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
17
17
100.00%
0.00%
17
17
100.00%
0.00%
100.00%
100.00%
SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
ST. SCHOLASTICA'S COLLEGETACLOBAN
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZAMBOANGA
(for.ZAEC)
UNIVERSITY OF BOHOL
UNIVERSITY OF LA SALETTESANTIAGO
UNIVERSITY OF LUZON (LUZON COLL.)
UNIVERSITY OF PERPETUAL HELP
RIZAL-CALAMBA CAMPUS
30
19
49
61.22%
100.00%
35
19
54
64.81%
14
13
27
51.85%
30
36
16.67%
20
43
63
31.75%
20
22
90.91%
0.00%
20
22
90.91%
17
28
45
37.78%
25
31
19.35%
23
53
76
30.26%
11
17
35.29%
10
14
28.57%
10
21
31
32.26%
0.00%
11
54.55%
12
18
33.33%
15
16
6.25%
11
15
26.67%
26
31
16.13%
60.00%
0.00%
50.00%
16
19
84.21%
50.00%
19
25
76.00%
17
11
28
60.71%
12.50%
18
18
36
50.00%
59
19
78
75.64%
13
15
13.33%
61
32
93
65.59%
23
27
85.19%
100.00%
26
30
86.67%
11
13
84.62%
14
10
24
58.33%
25
12
37
67.57%
83.33%
0.00%
62.50%
69
74
93.24%
60.00%
72
79
91.14%
37
37
100.00%
100.00%
38
38
100.00%
17
21
19.05%
16
21
23.81%
33
42
21.43%
10
12
16.67%
10
14
28.57%
20
26
23.08%
0.00%
100.00%
100.00%
NOTHING FOLLOWS---------------------Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of
the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees
themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.