مقایسه kbf, ebf

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

13

)(EBF

1 2

-1 mahdi.harati@yahoo.com
-2 morteza.razi@ gmail.com
-3 ebrahimi@mail.uk.ac.ir
mahdi.harati@yahoo.com

) (KBF
) (EBF
SAP 2000

2800
: EBF

.1



. ) (EBF ) (Roeder & Popov
.
EBF



.

.
Aristizabel-Ochoa
((ASCE.Stru.Jor ] [1
.
.
.2


13

] [2
2800) ( ] [3 .
) (C
III . 7 .
700 200 .
] [4 .
.3

b h
=
) (1
B H

.

B=L=7m
H=3.2m
h/H=e/L=0.3, 0.25 ,0.2, 0.15

-1

) (2 ) (3
KBF EBF .

10 5 15 3.2

.
2UNP
ETABS 2000 ] [5
. .

- 2


13

.4

)(Pushover


) ( ) ( ) (1

Te
g
4 2

t = C0C1C2C3 S a

)(1
Te S a Te C0
, C2 C1 C3 .
:
-1 : .
-2 : )(2
W
Fi = n
.V
)(2
W j
j =1

Fi Wi i i V

] [FEMA356 6 SAP2000 ] [7
.5

e
h
,
L H

, 10 5 15 .


13

4 a) 5) : :b) 10) c) 15):

KBF

e h


L H
.6

-
[8 ] .
.7



V y VS RSO
0
)(3

Vy
VS

= RSO

Rs = Rso F1 F2 ...
)(4
R = RS R
)(5
Ru Rw .
) (6
)(6

Y = Rw / Ru


13

Y 7/1-4/1
.
) ( R
.
] . .
[10,9

1
+1

1
1
3

= 1+

exp 3 / 2(ln T ) 2
10T T 2T
5

1
2
1

= 1+

exp 2(ln T ) 2
12T T 5T
5

T
3T
T 1
= 1 + g g exp 3(ln ) 2
3T 4T
T
4
g

= R

)(7


) (1 ) (2

h e
= = 0.3
H L

- 1

Rw

Ru

5.48
5.81
6.64

3.92
4.15
4.55

2.92
2.45
2.33

0.78
0.76
0.91

2.51
2.10
2.21

Rs

Rso

1.34
1.70
1.95

1.16
1.47
1.70

Vs

) (ton

Vy

) (ton

290
572
972

249
388
572

Te

)(sec

0.80
1.23
1.88

Number
of stories
5
10
15

- 2

Rw

Ru

10.36
8.95
8.93

7.40
6.39
6.39

4.05
4.67
3.43

0.93
0.75
0.88

3.84
3.76
3.14

Rs

Rso

1.83
1.37
1.86

1.59
1.19
1.62

Vs

) (ton

112
265
356

Vy

) (ton

178
315
577

Te

)(sec

0.63
1.03
1.72

Number
of stories
5
10
15

KBF 5/10-5/8

.
) (5

.


13

-5 ) ) :a ): (b

) (6

.
- 6 ) ) :a ): (b

.8


10 ) (7 .



.
.
)
(

)b
(a

7 )a) : ) :(b


.9
2800
:
)(8

m < 0.025h

m < 0.02h

T<0.7sec
T0.7sec


13

T . ) (8 5 15
KBF .

- 8

) )a
15
)(b

5

.10

.

.

.
KBF EBF
KBF EBF .
.
-

.11
1.Arisizabal-ochoa JD. Disposable knee bracing: Improvement in seismic design of steel frames. Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE 1986
" " .2
1380
" .3
)1384 " (2800
" .4
1387 "
Computers & Structures, Inc., ETABS, Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems, Berkeley, California.5
6. FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, 2000
7.Computers & Structures, Inc., SAP2000, Structural Analysis Program, Berkeley, California.
. 8
1386 239
9. Nassar, A.A., Osteraos, J.D and Krawinkler, H. (1992) Seismic design based on strength and ductility
demand. Proceedings of the 10th worth Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 5861-5866.
10. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant
design. Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357-379.


13

You might also like