Professional Documents
Culture Documents
مقایسه kbf, ebf
مقایسه kbf, ebf
مقایسه kbf, ebf
)(EBF
1 2
-1 mahdi.harati@yahoo.com
-2 morteza.razi@ gmail.com
-3 ebrahimi@mail.uk.ac.ir
mahdi.harati@yahoo.com
) (KBF
) (EBF
SAP 2000
2800
: EBF
.1
. ) (EBF ) (Roeder & Popov
.
EBF
.
.
Aristizabel-Ochoa
((ASCE.Stru.Jor ] [1
.
.
.2
13
] [2
2800) ( ] [3 .
) (C
III . 7 .
700 200 .
] [4 .
.3
b h
=
) (1
B H
.
B=L=7m
H=3.2m
h/H=e/L=0.3, 0.25 ,0.2, 0.15
-1
) (2 ) (3
KBF EBF .
10 5 15 3.2
.
2UNP
ETABS 2000 ] [5
. .
- 2
13
.4
)(Pushover
) ( ) ( ) (1
Te
g
4 2
t = C0C1C2C3 S a
)(1
Te S a Te C0
, C2 C1 C3 .
:
-1 : .
-2 : )(2
W
Fi = n
.V
)(2
W j
j =1
Fi Wi i i V
] [FEMA356 6 SAP2000 ] [7
.5
e
h
,
L H
, 10 5 15 .
13
KBF
e h
L H
.6
-
[8 ] .
.7
V y VS RSO
0
)(3
Vy
VS
= RSO
Rs = Rso F1 F2 ...
)(4
R = RS R
)(5
Ru Rw .
) (6
)(6
Y = Rw / Ru
13
Y 7/1-4/1
.
) ( R
.
] . .
[10,9
1
+1
1
1
3
= 1+
exp 3 / 2(ln T ) 2
10T T 2T
5
1
2
1
= 1+
exp 2(ln T ) 2
12T T 5T
5
T
3T
T 1
= 1 + g g exp 3(ln ) 2
3T 4T
T
4
g
= R
)(7
) (1 ) (2
h e
= = 0.3
H L
- 1
Rw
Ru
5.48
5.81
6.64
3.92
4.15
4.55
2.92
2.45
2.33
0.78
0.76
0.91
2.51
2.10
2.21
Rs
Rso
1.34
1.70
1.95
1.16
1.47
1.70
Vs
) (ton
Vy
) (ton
290
572
972
249
388
572
Te
)(sec
0.80
1.23
1.88
Number
of stories
5
10
15
- 2
Rw
Ru
10.36
8.95
8.93
7.40
6.39
6.39
4.05
4.67
3.43
0.93
0.75
0.88
3.84
3.76
3.14
Rs
Rso
1.83
1.37
1.86
1.59
1.19
1.62
Vs
) (ton
112
265
356
Vy
) (ton
178
315
577
Te
)(sec
0.63
1.03
1.72
Number
of stories
5
10
15
KBF 5/10-5/8
.
) (5
.
13
-5 ) ) :a ): (b
) (6
.
- 6 ) ) :a ): (b
.8
10 ) (7 .
.
.
)
(
)b
(a
7 )a) : ) :(b
.9
2800
:
)(8
m < 0.025h
m < 0.02h
T<0.7sec
T0.7sec
13
T . ) (8 5 15
KBF .
- 8
) )a
15
)(b
5
.10
.
.
.
KBF EBF
KBF EBF .
.
-
.11
1.Arisizabal-ochoa JD. Disposable knee bracing: Improvement in seismic design of steel frames. Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE 1986
" " .2
1380
" .3
)1384 " (2800
" .4
1387 "
Computers & Structures, Inc., ETABS, Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems, Berkeley, California.5
6. FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, 2000
7.Computers & Structures, Inc., SAP2000, Structural Analysis Program, Berkeley, California.
. 8
1386 239
9. Nassar, A.A., Osteraos, J.D and Krawinkler, H. (1992) Seismic design based on strength and ductility
demand. Proceedings of the 10th worth Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 5861-5866.
10. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant
design. Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357-379.
13