Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Serksu Company Thailand
Serksu Company Thailand
Serksu Company Thailand
Company Background
Time Line
1.
2.
3.
4.
: www.sermsukplc.com
ThaiBev Group
Spirit
Beer
Non Alcohol
Food
Corporate Structure
99.99
10
()
40
10
2554
34.34%
7,311
65.66%
13,981
Financial Performance
2551
2552
2553
19,257.2
19,854.44
22,176.51
21,521.05
18,987.73
139.6
353.67
467.92
55.13
738.75
0.53
1.33
1.76
0.21
2.78
13.30
23.28
43.21
110.76
P/E ()
ROA (%)
1.51
4.99
5.50
1.19
5.43
ROE (%)
2.24
5.61
5.71
0.59
5.13
: 30 2555 120.8
478
Exclusive Bottling Appointment (EBA)
Growth
25,000.00
20,000.00
128.50%
140.00
120.00
100.00
15,000.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
10,000.00
3.10%
20.00
5,000.00
0.00
11.70%
-2.96%
20.00
0.00
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555 (Q3)
PET
2,500
9,500
1
Brand
25%
: 2554
2555
Sport Drink, 3,000 ,
Functional Drink,
4,200 , 3%
Ready to drink
Coffee, 8,500 , 6%
2%
: ,
2556
55
49,000
38,000
20,000
12,000
11,400
3,000
8,500
56
5%
7-8%
3%
36.7%
10%
20.2%
1.5%
: 31 2555/ 19 2555/ 19
38,500
20%
5%
24%
75%
* 70% 30%
** 60%
42%
34%
20,000
5,000
Economic
AEC
Technology
Social
Globalization
Buyer
+
+
Suppliers
Substitutes
-
Functional drink
-
+
-
-
Buyer
+
+
Economic of scale
- Switch Cost
Suppliers
-
-
-
-
Substitutes
- Discount Store
+
Competitor Analysis
2554
()
Q3-2555
18,827
22,506
4,416
5249
14,966
16,332
3997
3669
3,004
5,204
457
1419
738
524
(113)
112
Brand
Local Brand
EST Cola,
,
,
,
supportactivities
primaryactivities
PROCUREMENT:
INBOUND
LOGISTICS:
OPERATIONS:
OUTBOUND
LOGISTICS:
300,000
1500
SERVICE:
MKT&SALES:
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
WEAKNESS
6 , 47 ,
1500 300,000
ThaiBev
R&D
EST Cola
SWOT ANALYSIS
OPPORTUNITIES
THREAT
(AEC)
Brand Loyalty
Broad Differentiation
Strategy
Best-Cost Provider
Strategy
Focused Low-Cost
Strategy
Focused Differentiation
Strategy
Strategic Positioning
Overall Low-Cost Provider Strategy
,
Economic of scale
KPI
Tool-McKinseys GE Matrix
Calculating weighted competitive attractiveness scores
EST
Competitive
attractive measure
Important
weight
Rating
score
Market growth
0.15
0.45
0.90
0.45
Market size
0.25
1.25
1.00
0.50
Demand variability
0.10
0.30
0.70
0.30
Industry profitability
0.10
0.20
0.70
0.50
Industry rivalry
0.20
0.60
1.00
0.60
Global opportunities
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
Macro environment
0.15
0.30
0.90
0.30
1.00
20
3.20
37
5.30
20
2.75
Total
Rating x
Rating
Rating x
Rating
Rating x
weight score score weight score score weight score
Tool-McKinseys GE Matrix
Calculating weighted competitive strength scores
EST
Competitive
attractive measure
Important
weight
Rating
score
Market share
0.25
1.00
1.75
0.50
0.10
0.80
0.70
0.20
Brand equity
0.10
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.40
3.60
3.60
3.60
Production operation
Profit margin relative to
competitor
0.10
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.20
1.00
36
6.75
41
7.60
26
5.40
Total
Rating x
Rating
Rating x
Rating
Rating x
weight score score weight score score weight score
Industry Attractiveness
A Nine-Cell
7.6
High
6.7
5.3
Medium
3.3
3.2
2.75
Low
High priority for resource allocation
6.756.7 5.4
3.3
Strong
Average
Weak
Corporate Strategy
4
1
2
3
4
Corporate Strategy
Growth Strategy Strategic Alliance
(Exclusive Policy)
()
(F&N)
Thank You
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5415350845
5415350918
5415350951
5415351086
5415351205
5415351230
5415351272
5415351311
5415351396
5415351418
5415351515