The document summarizes a 2006 program performance report for the Foreign Language Assistance program under Title V, Part D-9 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The program received $21.78 million in 2006 funding to assist local and state agencies in establishing, improving, or expanding foreign language study for K-12 students. The program's objective was to increase the percentage of projects reporting improvements in students' foreign language proficiency based on project targets. In 2005, 80% of projects reported improvements, exceeding the target of 50%. Data for 2006 and beyond were still pending as of the report date.
The document summarizes a 2006 program performance report for the Foreign Language Assistance program under Title V, Part D-9 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The program received $21.78 million in 2006 funding to assist local and state agencies in establishing, improving, or expanding foreign language study for K-12 students. The program's objective was to increase the percentage of projects reporting improvements in students' foreign language proficiency based on project targets. In 2005, 80% of projects reported improvements, exceeding the target of 50%. Data for 2006 and beyond were still pending as of the report date.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document summarizes a 2006 program performance report for the Foreign Language Assistance program under Title V, Part D-9 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The program received $21.78 million in 2006 funding to assist local and state agencies in establishing, improving, or expanding foreign language study for K-12 students. The program's objective was to increase the percentage of projects reporting improvements in students' foreign language proficiency based on project targets. In 2005, 80% of projects reported improvements, exceeding the target of 50%. Data for 2006 and beyond were still pending as of the report date.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Strategic Goal 2 Discretionary ESEA, Title V, Part D-9 Document Year 2006 Appropriation: $21,780 CFDA 84.293: Foreign Language Assistance 84.293B: Foreign Language Assistance Grants (LEAs) 84.293C: Foreign Language Assistance Program (SEAs)
Program Goal: Assist local and state educational agencies in establishing,
improving or expanding foreign language study for elementary and secondary school students. Objective 1 of 1: The percentage of Foreign Language Assistance projects that report improvements in proficiency in a foreign language for students served in the project based on project developed targets. Measure 1.1 of 1: The percentage of Foreign Language Assistance projects that report improvements in proficiency in a foreign language for program participants. (Desired direction: increase) Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2004 65 Measure not in place 2005 50 80 Target Exceeded 2006 75 (January 2007) Pending 2007 75 (January 2008) Pending 2008 75 (January 2009) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Grant Performance Report (ED524B). Frequency of Data Collection. Annual Data Quality. There are no statutory reporting requirements. Grantee annual performance reports indicate a multitude of various assessments used to determine and plot student growth in language ability. Explanation. Grantees are local educational agencies (LEAs) that receive funding for three years. Each grantee establishes its own annual performance targets for improved foreign language proficiency. Data on improved foreign language proficiency come from the annual report received at the end of the second year of the grant. Not all funded projects provide instruction, some focus on developmental activities such as teacher training and, therefore, would not collect data on improvements in foreign language proficiency. Others may not collect data in the first year of the grant. In 2005, reported performance data were submitted by grantees that were first funded in 2003. 62% of those grantees provided data. Due to changes in reporting, the date of data available has been changed.