Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pi Is 0140673612605121
Pi Is 0140673612605121
treated by antibiotics after complete resolution of their symptoms. The correspondents plead for a post-therapeutic survey on the basis of the results of the trial by Murphy and colleagues.4 However, the patients included in that study were treated with antibiotics for an appendiceal mass, and the authors recommended a posttherapeutic survey to avoid an interval appendectomy. Patients with such a presentation of complicated appendicitis were excluded from our trial.
I declare that I have no conicts of interest.
Corinne Vons
corinne.vons@jvr.aphp.fr
Assistance Publique Hpitaux de Paris, Hpital Jean Verdier, 93143 Bondy, France 1 Meshikhes AW. Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 4: 76775. Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Baek JH. A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of appendiceal tumors from 3,744 appendectomies: a single-institution study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 61721. Pickard PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA Jr, Kende AI. Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT ndings with pathological comparison. Radiology 2002; 224: 77581. Murphy EM, Farquharson SM, Moran BJ. Management of an unexpected appendiceal neoplasm. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 78392.
Authors reply
David Juli and colleagues raise the important question of overlooking a primary neoplasm of the appendix during antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis.1 We took this possibility into consideration in our trial and attempted to exclude all patients who presented with this risk. All the patients included in our trial had a CT scan before inclusion, and those with signs of complicated appendicitis were excluded from the study. Appendiceal neoplasms are more frequently found in patients with complicated appendicitis.2 Patients with an appendix with a diameter of more than 15 mm were also excluded. CT ndings strongly suggest that underlying neoplasms occur most commonly in patients with suspicious appendicitisie, an appendiceal diameter greater than 15 mm or a morphological abnormality such as cystic dilatation or soft-tissue mass with or without an associated perforation.3 Therefore, we did not consider that a morphological examination (by CT scan or colonoscopy) was necessary in the follow-up of our patients
Submissions should be made via our electronic submission system at http://ees.elsevier.com/ thelancet/
e45