Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 51 views

    Peer Feedback

    Uploaded by

    Sam Jones
    The document provides peer feedback on three magazine spreads: the double page spread, contents page, and front cover. For the double page spread, the feedback noted the color scheme, layout, style, and image were done well, while the text could be made bigger and more readable. For the contents page, the layout, color scheme, and image suiting the genre were praised, though the "win box" could be smaller, text color matched the palette, and more content was needed. Regarding the front cover, the simplicity, fonts suiting the magazine, and unique background were done well, but it needed more cover lines, to be busier, and text on the banner changed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Peer Feedback

    Uploaded by

    Sam Jones
    51 views2 pages
    The document provides peer feedback on three magazine spreads: the double page spread, contents page, and front cover. For the double page spread, the feedback noted the color scheme, layout, style, and image were done well, while the text could be made bigger and more readable. For the contents page, the layout, color scheme, and image suiting the genre were praised, though the "win box" could be smaller, text color matched the palette, and more content was needed. Regarding the front cover, the simplicity, fonts suiting the magazine, and unique background were done well, but it needed more cover lines, to be busier, and text on the banner changed.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides peer feedback on three magazine spreads: the double page spread, contents page, and front cover. For the double page spread, the feedback noted the color scheme, layout, style, and image were done well, while the text could be made bigger and more readable. For the contents page, the layout, color scheme, and image suiting the genre were praised, though the "win box" could be smaller, text color matched the palette, and more content was needed. Regarding the front cover, the simplicity, fonts suiting the magazine, and unique background were done well, but it needed more cover lines, to be busier, and text on the banner changed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as odt, pdf, or txt
    51 views2 pages

    Peer Feedback

    Uploaded by

    Sam Jones
    The document provides peer feedback on three magazine spreads: the double page spread, contents page, and front cover. For the double page spread, the feedback noted the color scheme, layout, style, and image were done well, while the text could be made bigger and more readable. For the contents page, the layout, color scheme, and image suiting the genre were praised, though the "win box" could be smaller, text color matched the palette, and more content was needed. Regarding the front cover, the simplicity, fonts suiting the magazine, and unique background were done well, but it needed more cover lines, to be busier, and text on the banner changed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as odt, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Peer Feedback

    Double Page Spread The things i did well: Colour Scheme Layout The Style The image

    Things I could improve: Make text bigger and more readable

    Contents Page Things I did well: Layout Colour Scheme Image suits the genre Simple

    Things I need to improve: Win box smaller Win text same colour as colour palette Needs more content Could be busier

    Front Cover Things I did well: Simple Fits genre Fonts suit magazine Banner is good Unique background

    Things I need to improve:

    Needs more cover lines Needs to be busier Text on banner needs changing

    You might also like