Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Perspective and Foreshortening Grading Chart: Category 25 20 15 10 Total

    Uploaded by

    Adrienne Sommer
    146 views1 page
    The document outlines a grading chart for evaluating artworks with categories for analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and description. The highest scores of 25-20 are for using multiple aesthetic criteria to judge the artwork and accurately describing dominant elements and how they relate to the theme. Scores of 15 are for trying but not accurately applying criteria, while 10 is for personal taste evaluations.

    Original Description:

    Rubrics

    Original Title

    Rubrics

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines a grading chart for evaluating artworks with categories for analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and description. The highest scores of 25-20 are for using multiple aesthetic criteria to judge the artwork and accurately describing dominant elements and how they relate to the theme. Scores of 15 are for trying but not accurately applying criteria, while 10 is for personal taste evaluations.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    146 views1 page

    Perspective and Foreshortening Grading Chart: Category 25 20 15 10 Total

    Uploaded by

    Adrienne Sommer
    The document outlines a grading chart for evaluating artworks with categories for analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and description. The highest scores of 25-20 are for using multiple aesthetic criteria to judge the artwork and accurately describing dominant elements and how they relate to the theme. Scores of 15 are for trying but not accurately applying criteria, while 10 is for personal taste evaluations.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    PERSPECTIVE AND FORESHORTENING GRADING CHART

    CATEGORY 25 Uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as composition, expression, creativity, design, communication of ideas. Accurately describes several dominant elements or principles used by the artist and accurately relates how they are used by the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork. 20 Uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. 15 Tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but does not apply the criteria accurately. 10 Evaluates work as good or bad based on personal taste. TOTAL

    Evaluation

    Analysis

    Accurately describes a couple of dominant elements and principles used by the artist and accurately relates how these are used by the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork.

    Describes some dominant elements and principles used by the artist, but has difficulty describing how these relate to the meaning or feeling of the artwork.

    Has trouble picking out the dominant elements.

    Description

    Makes a complete and detailed description of the subject matter and/or elements seen in a work.

    Makes a detailed description of most of the subject matter and/or elements seen in a work.

    Makes a detailed description of some of the subject matter and/or elements seen in a work.

    Descriptions are not detailed or complete.

    Interpretation

    Forms a somewhat reasonable hypothesis about the symbolic or metaphorical meaning and is able to support this with evidence from the work.

    Student identifies the literal meaning of the work.

    Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally.

    Student finds it difficult to interpret the meaning of the work.

    TOTAL SCORE

    You might also like