Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order Denying Plaintiff's Emerg Motion of Disqualify RCR & BRC (Judge Cook 7-22-10)
Order Denying Plaintiff's Emerg Motion of Disqualify RCR & BRC (Judge Cook 7-22-10)
NEIL 5. GILLESPIE, Plaintiff. and BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A., A Florida Corporation, and WILLIAM J. COOK, Defendants.
01<1)131< 1)ENYING I'I.AIN1'IFI"S l<Rllil<GENCSRI0'I'IO.V 1'0 I)ISOUAI.II.'\' 1)liFEWAU'I'S' COUNSl4, RYAN CII~lS'VOl'lII~I< R0l)l~~RlS lL\RKl*~l< & l<Ol)l<JIS& COOK, P A .
05-CA-007205 G
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Plaintiff's motion, filed July 9, 2010. This is the
third time that the Plaintiff has motioned to disqualify Defendant's counsel, despite having been informed in an order issued May 12, 2006 that this issue had been DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. prejudice" that means that the motion in question is "finally disposed "With
that claim."' Moreover, because of the doctrine of res jrrdicata this motion must be DENIED. The Plaintiff is again noticed (as he has been in two previous Court orders) that repeat filings attempting to revisit the same issue can be found to rise to the level of a sanctionable o f f e n ~ e . ~ The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to never accept another pleading from the Plaintiff that indicates an attempt to disqualify Defendants' counsel, as this matter has been DISMISSED WITH
'
PREJUDICE. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, on July ,
.
Martha J. Cook CLRCUIT COURT JUDGE
Mmll ilk J ~ 0 ' 1
t ii~,iIii JU[)(>'