Assignment # 23 Name: Joe Peck Period: 4 Date: 2/12/13

www.inhabitant.com/image

Will My Building Withstand an Earthquake? Architect Frank Lloyd Wright was an innovator in designing buildings that could withstand earthquakes. For example, Wright designed the Imperial Hotel in Tokyo, which withstood that citys severe 1923 earthquake with only minor damage. Many modern cities located in earthquake prone areas have enacted building codes designed to reduce damage to structures, thereby reducing the incidents of injury or death. Architects often go beyond these safety codes to ensure public safety. For example, the Transamerica Pyramid in San Francisco is stronger than required by the citys building code. It also has features built into its base that are designed to dramatically reduce how much the building will sway during an earthquake.

Problem: What design strategies keep structures safe in an earthquake?

Hypothesis: If my structure of 25 centimeters tall can withstand an earthquake, then the design strategy of a low center of gravity (cross bracing, using a wide base, anchoring, a low center of gravity, rigid frame, or flexible frame) will be the most important factor in keeping it safe and minimizing damage. Materials: 40 Toothpicks 5 mini marshmallows or 25 grams of clay Sheet of paper (to build structure on and put names and group number on) Procedure: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Make your hypothesis if you havent already done so. On the back or bottom of this sheet, sketch a plan how you and your partner are going to build your structure. How are you going to use the materials? Draw an example of your structure. Have the teacher check and sign off on your drawing. Before you start building get a group number AQ10. Once the teacher has given you your group number, you may start building your model. After you have finished making your model, fill out the data table for your group below. Place your model on the counter with a piece of paper underneath it and be sure your names and group number are on it. Collect data from all the other groups so that your data table is filled out. Results: Class Data Table for Period # _____ Group Height of Width of # of Anchore Low center of # model base cross d to the gravity (centimeters) (centimeters) braces paper (majority of the (yes or mass is lower no) than halfway down (yes or no) Rigid (clay) or Flexible (marshmallow) (choose one) Time lasted on the shake table (seconds)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16.5 20.0 4.5 9.5 8.0 8.1 19.9 16.1 16.5 24.0 16.4 13.0 15.5 9.0 11.5

12.0 7.9 14.5 4.0 9.0 13.3 12.0 7.0 7.5 6.0 4.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 15.0

0 8 14 1 0 0 20 4 4 3 0 0 20 1 1

no no yes no yes no no no no no no no no no no

yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

rigid rigid flexible rigid flexible rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid rigid

1 12 15, 15 1 15, 15 15, 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

Observations: My model lasted 1 second. It fell over 90 and split into 3 pieces. Conclusion: According to the textbook on page 204-205 shear walls, tension ties, base isolators, cross braces, dampers, and flexible pipes are good design strategies because they can help save the lives of people. In this lab we tested design strategies that keep structures safe in an earthquake. I hypothesized that my structure of twenty-five centimeters tall could withstand an earthquake, then the design strategy of a low center of gravity is most important. Over the course of one second my structure broke into three pieces. Two of the three pieces fell off of the shake table. Mr. Shern destroyed one of the pieces of my building in the swinging arm. One hundred percent of the flexible structures survived the earthquake. One out of the three that lasted the whole time used the strategy of a rigid building. In conclusion my hypothesis was incorrect. Anchoring and flexibility were the most important factors in keeping the structures safe and minimizing damage during an earthquake