UDK 630*156.2+630*156.

1
:
: ,
, .
,
.
.
: , , .
ANALYSIS OF THE NECESSARY NUMBER OF GAME WARDENS
BY SCALAR ESTIMATION METHOD
Abstract: This paper presents the application of scalar estimation in the calculation of the optimal
number of game wardens depending on the hunting ground specificities, i.e.: hunting ground area,
number of hunters, orographic conditions, and hunting ground accessibility. The aim of this study
is the objective management decision making on the necessary number of game wardens, as well as
the definition of parameters with major effects on the necessary number of game wardens. As the
result, it can be concluded that the number of game wardens does not depend on the hunting ground area only.
Key words: game warden service, scalar estimation method, hunting ground.

1.
,
, .
. . , o .


. .

: , ,
. . ().
1

, - ,

-, 2011.

97

 . , , ,
.
, . (),

.

2.
, .

. . .

3.

(www.lovacki-savez-srbije.com/clanice.htm). ().
:
1. ():
;
; -
(Vtv) ().
2. ():
;
; (Rs);
; .

3.1.
()
, , , . . .
, (Analytic Hierarchy Process
AHP, S a a t y , T.L., 1980). () 98

3-4

 . O
, . (2000) , .
(2000). .
() , .
Saaty-. Saaty-
( ) . 1 Saaty-.
1. Saaty - (S)
Table 1. Saaty - scale (S)
(S)
1
3
5
7
9
2,4,6,8

(S)

.
,
2. . .
. , , .
- (Vtv)
.
2.
Table 2. Scheme of the basic matrix for the criteria comparison

1,00

a2

1/1

1,00

a4

1/2

1/4

1,00

1/3

1/5

1/6

1,00

CI, (1):
-, 2011.

99

CI =

( max n)
( n 1)

(1)

x , n , .
(CR), (CI) . (RI) (CR=CI/RI). 0,10. (RI) 0,90.

3.2. ()
(Vtv),
, .

, .
,
( , ., , ., 2008).
(),
1 5, .
. (S t u r g e s , H., 1926).
, . ,
, . , . ().
3.
able 3. Calculation of the coefficients for evaluation classes

..
(Vtv)

II

III

...N

1 1

1 2

1 3

1 n

2 1

2 2

2 3

2 n

3 1

3 2

3 3

3 n

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 n

(Rs)

(Rs) . (Rs)
. .
100

3-4

 (Rs) , , .
3.
, , (Vtv)
(Rs) .
, , .

4.
: , , .
. ... ... ( , . 18/10).
.
,
.
(, , ) , , ,
.
.
.

.
,
(km/1000h).
.
,
.

(Vtv).
4.
- (Vtv), (CR) , . 0,10
0,06 (CR<0,10 = 0,06).
5. (Vtv%) 52,32%, 22,89%,
15,53%, 9,26%.
-, 2011.

101

 4.
Table 4. Matrix for the criteria comparison

1,00

4,00

3,00

4,00

0,25

1,00

2,00

3,00

0,33

0,50

1,00

2,00

0,25

0,33

0,50

1,00

5. (Vtv)
Table 5. Weight vector values (Vtv) of the basic matrix for the criteria
. .
(Vtv)

. .
(Vtv%)

0,5232

52,32%

0,2289

22,89%

0,1553

15,53%

0,0926

9,26%

(Vtv)
- .
.
. 6.
K Sturges- (S t u r g e s , H.,
1926) .
6.
Table 6. Description of criteria per evaluation classes

10.000
(h)

(km/1000h)

102

250

II
III
IV
V
10.001
25.001
40.001
55.001
25.000
40.000
55.000
70.000
251
501
751
1.001
500
750
1.000
1.250

8 10

11
15

16 17

18
20

VI
> 70.000
> 1.250

> 20

3-4

 (Vtv) (Rs), , (Rs) , (Vtv). 7

.
7.
Table 7. Values of the coefficients for evaluation classes
.
. (Vtv)

I
II
III
IV
V
VI

0,5232

0,52 1,05 1,57

2,09 2,62

3,14

0,2289
0,1553
0,0926

0,23 0,46 0,69

0,16 0,31 0,47
0,09 0,19 0,28

0,92 1,14
0,62 0,78
0,37 0,46

1,37
0,93
0,56

(Rs)

a,
(), 8
.
8.
Table 8. An example of determining the number of game wardens using scalar method

3,14
1,57
3,14
1,57

0,46
0,23
0,92
0,69

2,09
1,37

1,05
0,69

1,05
0,46

0,52
0,23

1,05
0,23
.
1,05
0,46

/ -
/

0,98
0,62
0,62
0,47

.
.
0,28
0,37
0,37
0,28

0,19

4,86
2,79
5,05
3,01

2
1
3
2

15.273
12.521
15.308
11.831

37.114
34.934
25.768
17.806

0,37

4,02

11.113

44.674

0,31

0,37

2,42

9.698

23.469

0,31

0,37

2,19

8.006

17.533

0,31

0,37

1,43

6.872

9.827

0,31

0,46

2,05

5.899

6.047

0,16

0,37

2,04

6.064

12.370

5.899
15.308

6.047
44.674

3
10.258

7
22.954

29,86
A / A A

-, 2011.

h /

15

103

 8. (
) , ,
. , 6.047 h,
5.899 h/. .

22.954 h .
, 44.674 h, 3
.
() 10.258 h,

15.308 h.
8,
, 30 . 15 .

. , ,
.

( ).

5.

.
.
()
.
() (), .
,
.
, (
),
15.308 h.
,
40.000 h , 10.258 h.
() , 104

3-4

 .
() .
- .

, ., , . (2008): I.
, , .
, ., , . (2000): . 32 (2000) 186-188, . 327-334.
S a a t y , T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.
McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 287.
, ., , ., , . (2000):
. 32
(2000) 183-185, . 237-242.
S t u r g e s , H. (1926): The choice of a class-interval. J.Amer.Statist.Assoc., 21, 65-66.
, . (1996):
. . 1-2, , .
(. 18/10)
www.lovacki-savez-srbije.com/clanice.htm
ANALYSIS OF THE NECESSARY NUMBER OF GAME WARDENS
BY SCALAR ESTIMATION METHOD
Branislav arevi
Summary
Important segments of any management system are human resources and the modalities of their
rational and cost-effective utilisation. The calculation of parameters affecting the optimal number of
game wardens using scalar methods (SMO) is presented on the concrete examples.
The aim of this study is the objective management decision making on the necessary number of
game wardens, as well as the definition of parameters with major effects on the necessary number of
game wardens.
This paper presents the method of determining the optimal number of game wardens in respect
to the hunting ground specificities i.e.: hunting ground area, number of hunters, orographic conditions and hunting ground accessibility. By the combination of the scalar method of estimation (SMO)
with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique, management decision making can be made objective by making them methodologically consistent at all levels of decision making.
Based on the scalar methods of estimation, it was found that the number of game wardens does
not depend only on the hunting ground area, and that it should not be conditioned by financial issues.
Scalar method can also be used by other users of hunting grounds and the optimal number of game
wardens can be determined at the level of hunting districts.
-, 2011.

105

106

3-4