Paul Suhey Letterman Letter

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SUCCESS WITH HONOR

March 28, 2013 Dear Fellow Lettermen, We write to you about a matter of great importance to our University. As fellow Lettermen and alumni of the Pennsylvania State University we, like the rest of the Nation, were horrified by the actions of Jerry Sandusky. No words that we or anyone else can say will ever heal Sanduskys victims, their families or the damage that he caused other than to say our thoughts and prayers remain with them. Also horrifying has been the ensuing damage inflicted to the standing of our University due in large part to the failure of the Board of Trustees. It is for this reason that we are compelled to step forward and oppose Paul Suheys re-election to the Board. We take this action with the full understanding of the division this may cause amongst us. It is not a role we relish but, it is one we believe is necessary to prevent any further damage to our University. At nearly every turn over the past sixteen months, the Board of Trustees has failed miserably to exercise the necessary leadership and responsibility to guide our University. No greater illustration is the Boards handling of Joe and the Freeh Report. While admittedly not knowing all of the facts, the Board unanimously rushed to judgment and fired Joe after 62 years of service to the University without ever once talking with him. Similarly, the Board to this very day has failed to discuss the substance of the Freeh report let alone question its evidentiary basis or lack thereof. The consequences of these actions have severely tarnished the reputation and legacy of Coach Paterno and have brought great harm upon the University, our beloved program and the innocent players and coaches who now occupy our locker room. In the coming days, you will no doubt hear how Paul Suhey disagreed with these actions but cannot tell his side for legal reasons or how knew Joe as Uncle Joe. To this we say nonsense! Actions speak louder than words and if Suhey disagreed with the actions the Board was taking he had both an obligation and a duty to speak up and cast his vote accordingly. The fact that he failed to do so only underscores the point that he is not fit to serve on the board a day longer. The choice is for everyone to make but, for us it could not be any clearer retire Paul Suhey, like he claimed to retire Joe, by not re-electing him.

Todd Blackledge82 Justin Ingram 00

Robert Capretto 67

Tom Donchez 74 Franco Harris 72 Brandon Short 99

Christian Marrone 97 Brian Masella 74 Lydell Mitchell 72 Steve Smear 69

Michael Robinson 04

You might also like