Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Write Peer Review
How To Write Peer Review
1. Constructive comments and suggestions of improvement on ONE of group member's micro teaching session Suitability of materials (proficiency/interest/skill development) Time management for each stage Set induction (relevance/effectiveness) Presentation (clarity/relevance/materials) Practice (choice of activity/opportunity to practice relevant skill Production (choice of activity/opportunity to practice relevant skill) Teacher Qualities (fluency of language/presence/rapport/confidence)
2. Constructive comments and suggestions of improvement on YOUR OWN micro teaching experience analyse each stage of your lesson for relevance and effectiveness also explain why these stages are important (Nunan/Scrivener) was the flow of the lesson appropriate?
explain why you have chosen to do what you have based on pedagogical principles (at least 3 good references focus on reading) were the selected skill(s) presented and practised sufficiently/support materials/activities relevant? (at least 3 good/different references education journals/Hudson/First Steps) 3. The strengths and weaknesses in the micro teaching, activities and materials used. what was good about your lesson plan/implementation? Why?
how can the materials/activities be improved? Give suggestions and reasons for changes 4.Conclusion what have you learnt from your experience?
*Support the review with suitable pedagogical principles. *20 Marks *1000 words