Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kertas Kerja Bulan Bahasa
Kertas Kerja Bulan Bahasa
Kertas Kerja Bulan Bahasa
The English Week is held in conjunction with Bulan Bahasa , 13 th to 30th April 2009. The English Week, organized by the English Department, offers a number of interesting language-based activities for all the students of SMK Agama Sri Aman Saratok. OBJECTIVES: 1. To promote the use of English among students 2. To encourage participation of students in school-level competitions 3. To identify new talents for school representatives 4. To instill interest among students in activities related to the English Language ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Advisor Head coordinator Draupkelley Publicity Prizes Refreshments Certificates Coordinators: Scrabble: (JudgesLanguage Society) Public Speaking: Essay writing: Miss Aida) Story Telling: Spell-it-right: Assistants: -Miss Aida Rosmayanti, Madam Rebecca members of the English -Madam Nelleyhamdra (Jugdes-Mdm Nelley, Miss Faridah) -Madam Agatha (Judges-Mdm Nelley, -Miss Cassandra Cindy Jolim , Miss Edwina (Judges-Miss Aida, Miss Azean) -Miss Jakeyah bt Rajali - Members of The English Language Society, SMK Agama Sri Aman Saratok - Ketua Bidang Bahasa, Puan Amira Abdul Razak - Ketua Panitia Bahasa Inggeris, Puan Nelleyhamdra -Miss Jakeyah Rajali - Miss Faridah Husna Abdullah -Madam Rebecca Jolim -Miss Cassandra Cindy Jolim, Miss Edwina Gilmelda
COMPETITION SCHEDULE
No .
1 2 3 4 5
Competitio n
Essay Writing Scrabble Spell-it-right Story Telling Public Speaking
Coordinato Date r
Mdm Agatha Miss Aida Mdm Rebecca Miss Jakeyah Miss Cassandra Miss Edwina Mdm Nelley 20/4/09 21/4/09 22/4/09 23/4/09 26/04/09
Venue (s)
PSS Language Lab, Form 1C Foyer Foyer
Categor y
Lower/Uppe r Lower/Uppe r Lower Lower/Uppe r Upper
Language Lab * Competitions will be held after the teaching and learning session (evening or night)
Certificates
*Prizes and certificates are provided by the English Department with the departments allocation.
REPORTS
Activity
Total Number of Participa nts 1st 10 2nd 3rd Lower Dyg Narissa (1B)
Winners
Mohd. Faeez Atif (3B) 2nd Ainur Husna (5D) Nurfadhillah Zaianal 3rd Nurul Amalina Salleh Abidin (1B) (4A) Comments (Strengths/Weaknesses/Suggestions for Improvement) The participants were assessed on their ability to write original and creative essays relevant to the questions chose and their overall mastery of the English Language. The participants managed to display their talents in writing good essays of a certain standard of the English language, with the use of good grammar, meticulous punctuation and spelling and quite an impressive level of vocabulary. The judges for the competitions were Miss Aida (lower forms) and Madam Nelley (Upper forms). Reported by, Madam Agatha Abdullah Total Number of Participa nts Lower
st
Essay Writing
1st
Activity
Winners
Upper 1 1 Abang Shahrailey (4A) Upper-6 Lower-11 2nd 2nd Mohd Iqmal (5A) 3rd 3rd Awg Hazrin Hafizi (5A) Comments (Strengths/Weaknesses/Suggestions for Improvement)
Scrabble
st
One of the main objectives of the competition was to encourage students to maximize usage of the dictionaries to look for words and their meanings which would enhance their vocabulary. Participation was overwhelming at first as many students handed in their names. However, on the competition day, many students did not turn up. Fortunately, many other students, voluntarily replaced them. This game is interesting and beneficial, and therefore should be held every year. English language teachers also need to expose their students to the game.
Activity
Winners
2 Siti Nasuha bt Bedi (2B) 2 rd rd 3 Nur Atiqah Nadira (3A) 3 Comments (Strengths/Weaknesses/Suggestions for Improvement) This competitions focus was to search for talented students who have excellent mastery of their vocabulary and with the ability to spell out words of various difficulty levels correctly. As too many students handed in their names, the list has to be shortlisted to 20 participants only. This is identified as the strength of the competituon, it was able to attract many students. However, one of the weaknesses is the difficulties if the words to be spelled out in the first round, resulting in majority of the form one students disqualified at the preliminary round. Therefore, it is to be noted that in future, these two points need to be taken into consideration:- number of participants from each class and the suitability of the level of the words for from preliminary to the final rounds. Reported by, Miss Jakeyah Rajali
Spell-itRight
Upper 1
st nd
Activity
Public Speakin g
Story Telling
Activity
Total Winners Number of Total Participa Number nts Winners of 3 Lower Participan 1st 1st ts st t 1 Abang Shahrailey (4A) 4 nd n 2 2 h
d
n 2 rd 3 d r
t 5 r 3 h d
Upper Mohd Izzat Syafiq (5B) Dyg Narissa Mohd Azdilla(1B) Amizwar (5B) Nurul Khairunissa Dayang Dayana (4A) (5A)
3 Hezret Hamani (1C) for Improvement) Comments (Strengths/Weaknesses/Suggestions d Comments (Strengths/Weaknesses/Suggestions for for Improvement) This competition was actually focused to find new talents public speaking among the form 4 students, although all upper forms students were encouraged to take The was to students encourage students to practice using the English Language. part.main Onlyaim very few handed in their names but most of them had to However, most contestants showed difficulty pronouncing words withdraw the last minute for involvement in in other activities.some The form 4 correctly, students weak grammar and lack of fluency in by delivery and uninteresting presentations. On (4A, 4B) were reluctant when insisted the English teacher (Mdm Agatha) to take the other hand, contestants should be praised for their courage to be able to be on part. stage and present individually. It was agreed that a lot of improvement should be done and perhaps this could be done during English period, whereby the English teachers Reported could by, ask students to present more frequently to class. Reported by, Mdm Nelleyhamdra Miss Edwina Gilmelda Miss Cassandra Cindy