Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

THE FIRST AMENDMENT I / SPEECH, PRESS, ASSEMBLY, PETITION AND ASSOCIATION A.

Freedom of speech Based on the historical context, there are a number of theoretical justifications of the freedom of speech accorded by the 1st amendment : The marketplace of ideas : open debate is necessary in a society in order for true ideas to prove their merit, and false ideas to be refuted The self government : citizens must be able to criticize and question the government without fear of reprisal The self realization = it allows the citizen to explore the widest range of ideas and perspective in order to achieve autonomy and personal fulfillment

1) What is included in freedom of speech ? Expressive conduct Freedom from compelled speech Freedom from prior restraint on speech

2) Congress shall make no law Despite the 1st amendment injunction that congress shall make no law curtailing freedom of speech, in reality the supreme court has always recognized the need for some government regulation of speech in some circumstances : Advocacy of illegal conduct : Free speech may only be impeded under the rare circumstances that it is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action. Bradenburg v. Ohio 1969 Fighting words : it is a limitation to freedom of speech The Chaplinsky ruling defined fighting words rather broadly. This doctrine included words which are likely to incite an immediate fight and words which inflict injury. Chaplinsky v. state of New Hampshire (1942) Obscenity : Miller v. California (1973) was an important United States Supreme Court case involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the Miller test for determining what constituted obscene material. Libel : New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case which established the actual malice standard which has to be met before press reports about public officials or public figures can be considered to be defamation and libel Commercial speech :

True threats :

Offensive language and hate speech :

You might also like