Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Impedance Matching in The Audio Signal Processing (Part XXX)
The Impedance Matching in The Audio Signal Processing (Part XXX)
The Impedance Matching in The Audio Signal Processing (Part XXX)
2. Analytical Work
In this study, and form the Thevenin voltage, while and deliver ac signal as and
(figure 1).
(a)
Figure 1.
(a).
(b).
(b)
The concept of circuit analyzed in the study
The equivalent circuit
2.1 Analysis of dc
First step, we have to calculate the Thevenins voltage in figure 1:
24
5
10 24
24
5
34
0.71 5
3.55
1|Page
3.55
0.7
2.85
The third step, we have to calculate " :
"
"
2.85
150
" 19$%
2.2 Analysis of ac
In the analysis of ac, we involve the capacitor to pass the ac signal and we also involve the internal
resistance of emitter known as &' (figure 2).
(a)
Figure 2.
(a).
(b).
(b)
The ac circuit
The equivalent circuit for ac analysis
25$
"
&'
25$
19$%
&' 1.32
The second step, we have to calculate &()*' :
&()*' + 1,- . /&' 01
&()*' 200 1,150 8.2/1.3201
2|Page
&()*' 201,158.2/1.3201
&()*' 201 2
&()*' 201 2
1
1
3
158.2 1.32
1.32
158.2
3
208.824 208.824
&()*' 201 2
159.52
3
208.824
&()*' 2010.764
&()*' 153.564
The third step is to calculate 5( :
5(
5(
&()*'
1$
153.564
5( 0.0065$%
5( 6.56%
The fourth step is to calculate 57 :
57 +5(
57 2000.0065$%
57 1.3$%
The last step is to calculate
:
57 &
1.3$%0.764
0.9932$
993.26
3. Simulation Work
The simulation work can be classified into the dc analysis and the ac analysis.
3.1 Analysis of dc
In the simulation,
is 3 (figure 3), while in the analytical work
is 3.55.
The different of the analytical work and the simulation work is:
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
3|Page
3.55 3
100%
3.55
%95::;&;<=;
0.55
100%
3.55
%95::;&;<=; 18.33%
))>?
7)> *@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
2.85 2.25
100%
2.85
%95::;&;<=;
0.6
100%
2.85
%95::;&;<=; 21.05%
"))>?
7)> "*@ )
100%
"))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
19$% 15$%
100%
19$%
%95::;&;<=;
4$%
100%
19$%
%95::;&;<=; 21.05%
4|Page
5(*@ >)
5())>?
7)>
100%
5(*@ >)
%95::;&;<=;
0.07$% 0.0065$%
100%
0.07$%
%95::;&;<=;
0.0635
100%
0.07
%95::;&;<=; 90.71%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 6.
5|Page
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(c)
5(
5(
5(
5(
5(
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
(e)
at 1Hz
at 10Hz
at 100Hz
at 1kHz
at 10kHz
In the simulation, 57 is 14.9$% (figure 7), while in the analytical 57 is 1.3$%. The difference is:
%95::;&;<=;
57*@ >)
57))>?
7)>
100%
57*@ >)
%95::;&;<=;
14.9$% 1.3$%
100%
14.9$%
%95::;&;<=;
13.6$%
100%
14.9$%
%95::;&;<=; 91.275%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 7.
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(c)
57
57
57
57
57
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
(e)
at 1Hz
at 10Hz
at 100Hz
at 1kHz
at 10kHz
In the simulation, 5
is 06% at 1Hz, is 06% at 10Hz, is 0.056% at 100Hz, is 0.946% at 1kHz, 9.616% at
10kHz, and 15.26% at 16kHz (figure 8). The difference is:
For 1Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 47.96%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0479$%
100%
1.3$%
%95::;&;<=;
1.2521$%
100%
1.3$%
%95::;&;<=; 96.315%
6|Page
For 10Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 81.76%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0817$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=;
1.2183$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=; 93.715%
For 100Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 84.96%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0849$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=;
1.2151$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=; 93.469%
For 1kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 84.86%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0848$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=;
1.2152$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=; 93.47%
For 10kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 84.86%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0848$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=;
7|Page
1.2152$%
100%
1.3000$%
For 16kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
5
))>?
7)> 5
*@ >)
100%
5
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
%95::;&;<=;
1.3$% 84.86%
100%
1.3$%
1.3000$% 0.0848$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=;
1.2152$%
100%
1.3000$%
%95::;&;<=; 93.47%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 8.
(e)
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(f).
(c)
5
5
5
5
5
5
in
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
at
at
at
at
at
at
(f)
1Hz
10Hz
100Hz
1kHz
10kHz
16kHz
In the simulation,
is 06 at 1Hz, is 06 at 10Hz, is 0.326 at 100Hz, is 5.366 at 1kHz, is 53.86
at 10kHz, and 85.36 at 16kHz (figure 9). The difference is:
For 1Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 2586
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
735.26
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=; 74.023%
8|Page
For 10Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 4586
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
535.26
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=; 53.88%
For 100Hz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 4756
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
518.26
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=; 52.17%
For 1kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 4756
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
518.26
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=; 52.17%
For 10kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 4756
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
518.26
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=; 52.17%
For 16kHz,
%95::;&;<=;
))>?
7)>
*@ >)
100%
))>?
7)>
%95::;&;<=;
993.26 4756
100%
993.26
%95::;&;<=;
9|Page
518.26
100%
993.26
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 9.
10 | P a g e
(e)
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(f).
(c)
in
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
at
at
at
at
at
at
(f)
1Hz
10Hz
100Hz
1kHz
10kHz
16kHz