1 2

- 1
Motahare.hosseini89@gmail.com
Mosaedi@um.ac.ir
- 2
KLNaseri@yahoo.com
- 3

:


.
.

.
. .
.

.
.

.
: .
:

. ...

.
. .
... .
.
( )EIA . EIA

.

.


( .)1931
) (Fuzzy Logic
. (
.)1931 ( .)1933 -

. .
...

.
.
.

.
-

... . -
.


.
...
.
.

... . -


-
.
.

.
( .)1931
.
. .
( )1311

 .
( ) -
( .)1931
.
( .)1931
.
( .)1933

.
.
.
.
( .)1931
. 1391
.
. ( )1 1/1 1 .
.
1391
. ( ) ( )
. 1311
.
. 1311 1313
1311 1311 ( .)1931

.
. .

(
.)1931 .
111 . ( )Drought ( )Normal
( )Wet
i Ri .
1 -
.

Wet State

()1

1000

900

Normal State
Dry State

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

-1 055

1 Ri=399.9 Ri=400.1
1/2
. .

.

2 -
. 2
. Ri=430


1/9 1/1 1/1 .
Ri=430 Ri=430
%11 %91
( .)1931

()2

()9

()1

0
1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

-2 055

. .
.
. .
.
) U(x x U x
( )Degree of membership
.
.
()1
9 ( .)1931

 -3

.
: -
.
IF x And y THEN z
. IF x And y
.
.
( .)1931

(
) . .
. .
.
. ( (Trimf ( )Trapmf.
( )Gaussmf ( )Gbellmf ... (
.)1933 1 1 .

()1

0 : x a
x a

:a xb
b a
f ( x , a , b, c )
c x : b x c
c b
0 : c x

-4

()1

0 : x a
x a

:a xb
b a
f ( x , a , b, c , d )
1 : b x c
d x
:c x d

d c

-0

.
( AND) ( OR) ( NOT) .
. .
:
()3
()3

()11

3 X
.
.
( .)1933

.
.
.
- ()TSK

( ) .
TSK
.

TSK .
( .)1931


.

. .
.
.

.
.
.
( )

( )
() .
...
. ( )
. (
) ... . (
) ( )
.
( . .)1931



.

. ( )1931b
.
.

. ( )FIS -
( )ANFIS
.

( .)1931a
( )1931

 FIS
.
FIS .

.
...
. ( .)2111

.
.
( )1931
. 1/1
. -
. ( )1932
.

. ( )2119

-
. ( )1333
.
( )
USLE .
( )1931 1
. -
.
. ( )1931

.
.

GIS .
.
( )2111 .
.
( )1933
. ( (AHP 12

 .
( )Sum ( )Product (( )Gama 1/9
)1/311 . 1/311
.
.
.
) )FIS Fuzzy Inference System - Adaptive Neuro-
) )ANFIS Fuzzy Inference System .
ANFIS FIS ( .)1933
.


. ( )1933
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
. -
.

. -


.

.1 . . . . .1933 .
AHP- ..GIS 21 1 .331-319
.2 . .1931 . . 913 .
.9 .1931 . .
112.

11

 .1 . .1931 . . 11 113
.11-11
.1 . .1931 .
( ) . 11 2 .211-221
.1 . .1933 . .MATLABL 191
.
.1 . .1931 . 2
9 .11-91
.3 . .1931 . . 91 .32-19
.3 . . .1931 . . 21
.11-19
.11 .1932 . .
211 .
.11 .. . . . . . .1933 .
. 3 1 .111-31
.12 .1931 . .
211 .
.19 . .1931
. 3 .
.11 . . . . . . .1933 .
( ) ..
.1933
.11 . . . . .1931a .
. 13 1 .
.11 . . . .1931b .
11 1 .
.11 . . .1931 . 11 21 .11-12
.13 . . .1931 . .
1 .211-131
19. Filippo, S., P.C. Martins Ribeiro & S.K. Ribeiro, 2007. A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Model applied to
management of the environmental restoration of paved highways, Transportation Research Part D,12:
423-436.
20. Mitra B.;H.D. Scott., J.C. Dixon & J.M. McKimmey, 1998. Applications of fuzzy logic to the
prediction of soil erosion in a large watershed, Journal of Geoderma, 86: 183-209.
21. Shu, C., Burn, D.H. 2004. Homogeneous pooling group delineation for flood frequency analysis
using a fuzzy expert system with genetic enhancement. Journal of Hydrology, 291: 132-149.
22. Tayfur G., S. Ozdemir & V. Singh, 2003. Fuzzy logic algorithm for runoff-induced sediment
transport from bare soil surfaces, Journal of Advances in Water Resources, 26: 12491256.
23. Zadeh, L. A. 1965.Quantative fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8: 338-353.

11

Features of Fuzzy logic and its application in water and soil resources managements
Seyyedeh Motahareh Hosseini
M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
motahare.hosseini89@gmail.com
Abolfazl Mosaedi
Associate Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
Mosaedi@um.ac.ir
Kamal-e-din Naseri
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
KLNaseri@yahoo.com

Abstract
Various branches of natural resources such as water and soil resources consist of phenomena and
issues which cannot be measured by quantitative methods and since their quantitative approach is
difficult, time-consuming and costly, qualitative approach is applied for establish them. The
obscurities observed in natural meanings and phenomena had better be considered as an integral part
of these fields of science. Most common methods in water and soil management is not able to support
a large volume of qualitative and quantitative of environmental information. In addition, many of these
information are associated with ambiguity and uncertainty. Fuzzy logic puts these obscurities in
mathematical formation and preparations for decision-making and reasoning. Nature and the
Environment, with complexity, dynamism and uncertainty are associated. Fuzzy logic can be
instrumental because of first having simple and flexible meanings and then using ambiguous data and
complex models. In spite of, measureless application of Fuzzy logic in engineering, this technique in
research purpose of water and soil resources and other relative objectives is not popular yet. Especially
in some fields of this science it is not documented yet. As a result, it seems necessary to learn about
this technique and how to apply it in different branches of these sciences. This paper aims to offer
features of Fuzzy logic simply and indicate diffrent natural resources and environment studies in
which Fuzzy systems were applied.
Keywords: Fuzzy logic, qualitative phenomena, natural resources and environment, water and soil
resources, modeling

12