Office of the
City Manager
TO:
ATTENTION:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM;
PAGE(S):
COMMENTS:
P.001
FAL No,
City of
PSs
Larry B. Johnson
Rob
504-593-8010
Al Coby
City Manager
City of Pensacola
(850) 435-1627
(850) 435-1611 (FAX)
5 (including cover)No P.002
APR/24/2009/FR1 11:01 AM
THe ScHoot District Or Escampia COUNTY
215 WEST GARDEN STREET
PENSACOLA, FL 32502
PH, 85043-6121
Inyp ww escambin 12.1.8
“Making A Positive Oerence™ MALCOLM THOMAS, SUPERINTENDENT
April 20, 2009
Al Coby, City Manager
City of Pensacola
180 Governmental Center
Pensacola, FL. 32521
‘Dear Mr. Coby:
‘Ata recent City Council meeting a council member, Mr. Larry Johnson spoke regarding
the School Board owned property located at 75 N. Pace Blvd (formerly Gulf Power).
Based on your discussion with Superintendent Thomas as conveyed to me, itis my
understanding that the Councilman had concerns regarding contamination of soil un the
property. Iam disappointed that the issue was raised without courtesy representation cr
consult of the School Board or School District staff as the issue would not have been
clevated to what apparently was portrayed as a serious concer.
My disappointment is due to the fact that School District staff met on site to discuss this
very issue with Mr. Johnson and members of Emerald Coast keepers at his request on
March 16, 2009 at 1 p.m. Also present at that meeting were School District contract
environmental engineers, consultants, a geologist, the new downtown school project
architect, the School District Facilities Planning Director, Project Manager and County
staff (Keith Wilkins). The comprehensive environmental study and wetlands
demarcation effort were also provided and reviewed at that time, All parties appeared to
bbe very satisfied regarding the disposition of the property purchased by the School Board.
‘To clarify the issue it is important to note the following:
1. The School Board did not purchase the parcel presently owned by Escambia
‘County known as Maggie’s Ditch.
2, Based on the environmental study and review (diagram attached ~ Enel, 1) the
contaminants appear to be most concentrated in and around the ditch. The study
reveals that there does not appear to be a recurring source and that the
contaminants appear to be residual from years of apparent dumping in Maggie's
Ditch.
Affirmative acon equal opportunity employerFAX No, P, 003
Al Coby, City Manager
April 20, 2009
Page 2
3. The School District did purchase property adjacent (north, south and east) of the
ditch.
4, There are limited soil findings north and south on School District purchased
property. The District will clean up the soil on the purchased parcels during the
site preparation stage of construction,
5, Asan added measure of assurance additional testing has been commissioned
‘throughout all of the properties purchased despite environmental engineers
indicating that the delineation of possible contamination has been identified.
(diagram attached - Encl. 2)
6. The School District will secure access to adjacent properties via fencing to further
safeguard students. We hope to work with the property owners of Maggie’s
Ditch, the City, and other agencies in the future to perhaps restore the Wetlands
and someday avail the students of an excellent learning opportunity in the
wetlands after cleanup.
It is important to note that the District conducted extensive study of the properties
purchased as a part of our due diligence. We continue to make the safety and welfare
of our students our highest priority
‘Thank you for the opportunity to address this issue. Should this matter resurface
please don’t hesitate to contact me at 850-469-6141. 1 will be happy to assist with
any questions or concerns.
Sincerely, ]
‘Shawn Dennis
‘Assistant Superintendent — Operations
¢: Malcolm Thomas, Superintendent
Nomm Ross, Deputy Superintendent
Patricia Hightower, Board Chairman
Ron Peacock, Director — Facilities Planning
Linda English, Executive Assistant — Superintendent
File
Enclosures