In communities in Michigan and across the country, drinking water and sewerage systems are straining under the weight of decades of federal government underinvestment. In recent years, the State Revolving Funds were financed at some of the lowest levels in history. For fiscal year 2008, Michigan received only $57 million, a mere 2.8 percent of the $2.1 billion that the state’s water and sewer systems need.
Original Title
Why Michigan Needs Federal Funding for Water Infrastructure
In communities in Michigan and across the country, drinking water and sewerage systems are straining under the weight of decades of federal government underinvestment. In recent years, the State Revolving Funds were financed at some of the lowest levels in history. For fiscal year 2008, Michigan received only $57 million, a mere 2.8 percent of the $2.1 billion that the state’s water and sewer systems need.
In communities in Michigan and across the country, drinking water and sewerage systems are straining under the weight of decades of federal government underinvestment. In recent years, the State Revolving Funds were financed at some of the lowest levels in history. For fiscal year 2008, Michigan received only $57 million, a mere 2.8 percent of the $2.1 billion that the state’s water and sewer systems need.
Funding for Water Infrastructure Fact Sheet • April 2009
O ur nation’s water infrastructure and economy are bound together. Aiding
the former will help the latter. Unfortunately, these days, both are treading troubled waters. In communities in Michigan and across the country, drinking water and sewerage systems are straining under the weight of decades of federal government underinvest- ment. In recent years, the State Revolving Funds were financed at some of the lowest levels in history. For fiscal year 2008, Michigan received only $57 million, a mere 2.8 percent of the $2.1 billion that the state’s water and sewer systems need.1
As the troubles with our water infrastructure mount, the
country’s economy slides deeper into recession. Michi- gan’s January 2009 unemployment rate reached 11.6 percent, or about 565,000 people, up from 7.3 percent a year earlier. One in nine people in the labor force are now unemployed.2
Investing now in water and sewer systems to gener-
ate solid economic growth can lead the state out of the recession. Every federal dollar invested in infrastructure yields a $1.59 return to our states.3 The National Utility Contractors Association estimates that for every $1 bil- lion spent on water infrastructure, nearly 27,000 jobs are created.4
The economic stimulus legislation passed by Congress in
February 2009 provides more money to water infrastruc- ture than the country has seen in recent years, but this projects at a total cost of at least $186 million.5 In 2008, one-time allotment cannot cure the problems plaguing the state received only $28.2 million in federal funding6 many communities. In fact, the bill provides water and — enough to finance 15.2 percent of its needs. sewer systems with less than one-third of what the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency estimates we should spend Federal contributions to Michigan’s drinking water each year just to maintain them. funding efforts have decreased by 52.8 percent since the Drinking Water SRF was implemented in fiscal 1997 and Michigan’s Water Infrastructure Funding Gap: 64.8 percent when adjusted for inflation.7 Michigan’s water needs outpace its current ability to fund projects by a large margin. For the Clean Water State Revolving Fund program, which goes toward wastewater infrastructure, the state’s For the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) pro- most recent Intended Use Plan lists 72 projects at a total gram, the state’s most recent Intended Use Plan lists 36 cost of $1.9 billion.8 In 2008, the state received $29.3 million in federal funding9 — enough to finance 1.6 per- cent of its needs.
Federal contributions to Michigan’s wastewater funding
efforts have decreased by 66.8 percent since the Clean Water SRF was fully implemented in fiscal 1991 and 79.0 percent when adjusted for inflation.10
Job Creation: Fully addressing Michigan’s currently
listed water needs of $2.1 billion would spur 54,833 employment opportunities, according to National Utility Contractors Association estimates for job creation from water infrastructure investments. That could put back to work one-tenth of the state’s unemployed people.
Water Quality: According to EPA’s 2006 National Wa-