Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organization of Multinational Operations: Ellen Devlin International Management 446 April 19, 2011 Class 4
Organization of Multinational Operations: Ellen Devlin International Management 446 April 19, 2011 Class 4
Definition: Designing a structure that explains the nature and extent of formal relationships among various internal components.
Allows for distribution of power among the organizations members. Establishes formal communication lines. Tool for attainment of a MNCs goals.
What should the units of the organization be? Which components should be joined, and which should be kept apart? What size and shape pertain to the different components? What is the appropriate placement of and relationship between different units?
NOTE: Organizational Design may become the responsibility of all managers at some point in their career.
JOBS
DEPARTMENTS
Six bases.
Knowledge and skill (Engineering department) Work Process and Function (Supply Chain, HR, Finance) Time (shifts in factory) Output (Products/Services) Client (Customer or supplier) Place (Geographic)
Geographic (where) Functional (what)
HRM
Finance
Manu.
Mktg
R&D
West Region
SW Region
South Region
Midwest Region
East Region
External Forces
Company Factors
What are they? Which one is the most important? Why should you care? What are the factors? Give a company example What does structure follow?
From Simple to Complex (size) From Domestic Orientation to Global Perspective (global presence)
Export Manager Reports to the Marketing Executive (Narrow Product Line) Export Manager Reports to C.E.O. (Broad Product Line) Increased Competition and Market Maturity- Local Manufacturing
Distant Operations Are Given Local Decision-Making Control Through Financial Reporting Foreign Subsidiary May Have Local Board of Directors
Very typical originally with European MNCs, but also practiced by P&G for a long time.
and Disadvantages
Can end up ignoring the common good (overall objectives) of the wider corporation. Can end up duplicating resources (e.g., manufacturing) and causing inefficiencies.
Increased International Involvement -- Require a Senior Executive Internal Specialists Are Needed A Desire to Be Proactive (Identify Opportunities).
EG Wal-Mart
The Geographic Division The Product Division The Functional Structure Mixed and Matrix Forms
The geographic division allows for the most local responsiveness. Why?
CEO
Headquarters Staff
European Division
Advantages
Disadvantages
Regional economies of scale Treatment of subsidiaries as profit centers. Good when regional customers are similar. Tend to be useful in mature businesses w/narrow product lines. Permits large manufacturing plants in low cost regional countries.
Not good for firms w/diverse product ranges (bad for coordination between product lines). Coordination at corporate level suffers. Rivalry among regions. Duplication of resources/plants. Difficulty transferring new technology and product ideas across regions/strong regional managers.
Headquarters Staff
Product Group A
Product Group B
Product Group C
Advantages
Disadvantages
Good for firms w/diverse product lines (often) w/hi technology content and different end users. Permits fast diffusion of technology across a product line/simultaneous intro of product across the world. Good when local manufacturing is favored (e.g., high tariffs) for certain product lines/concentration of key activities in one locale. Facilitates quick response to global competitive pressures against certain products.
May result in wasteful duplication of plants and sales personnel. Customers may be interacting with many representatives from the company. Limited voice to local managers on needed adaptations.
R&D (Worldwide)
Marketing (Worldwide)
Manufacturing (Worldwide)
Finance (Worldwide)
USA Division
European Division
Matrix Organization
USA
R e Europe g i o n s
Asia/Pacifi c
The Americas
Apparel
Equipment
HR/Finance/ IT/Etc.
Japan
Emerging Markets
Other
Challenges of a matrix
The Matrix is a state of mind. HBR It is an efficient use of specialists and equipment and can improve vertical and lateral communication and information flow. BUT..is costly, cumbersome and a lot of work for managers! Wearing two hats, and often leads to tensions. Lots of shared decision making. e.g. Dow Chemical (now adapted).
Network Model
Large Flows of Components, Products, Resources and Information among the network
Next Week
Test 1 Group Project Time
What did I learn today? What is still a little foggy? Other comments.