Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 104 views

    Sean Chingkaw Areas of Knowledge Part 3

    Uploaded by

    FleetingHips
    This document contains a student's responses to questions about their epistemological views across different domains of knowledge and ways of knowing. For natural science, the student's philosophy of knowledge is relativist and they rank sense perception as most important, relying 25% on authority and 75% on evidence/argument. For religion, their view is relativist, language is most important, and they rely 20% on authority and 80% on evidence.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sean Chingkaw Areas of Knowledge Part 3

    Uploaded by

    FleetingHips
    104 views2 pages
    This document contains a student's responses to questions about their epistemological views across different domains of knowledge and ways of knowing. For natural science, the student's philosophy of knowledge is relativist and they rank sense perception as most important, relying 25% on authority and 75% on evidence/argument. For religion, their view is relativist, language is most important, and they rely 20% on authority and 80% on evidence.

    Original Description:

    IB CLE

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a student's responses to questions about their epistemological views across different domains of knowledge and ways of knowing. For natural science, the student's philosophy of knowledge is relativist and they rank sense perception as most important, relying 25% on authority and 75% on evidence/argument. For religion, their view is relativist, language is most important, and they rely 20% on authority and 80% on evidence.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    104 views2 pages

    Sean Chingkaw Areas of Knowledge Part 3

    Uploaded by

    FleetingHips
    This document contains a student's responses to questions about their epistemological views across different domains of knowledge and ways of knowing. For natural science, the student's philosophy of knowledge is relativist and they rank sense perception as most important, relying 25% on authority and 75% on evidence/argument. For religion, their view is relativist, language is most important, and they rely 20% on authority and 80% on evidence.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    RELIGION AS AN AREA OF KNOWLEDGE 2

    GOD MATTERS XS IB CLE 2013-2014 Full Name


    Paul --------------------Jefferson Gue

    Section

    LC#

    Sean Chingkaw

    Note: This is your digital worksheet. You will nd the instructions for todays module here. Perform the requested tasks using this Pages le. In other words, make it your own. Thank you!

    Part One: YOUR Epistemological World Views Summarize here your ndings (even if tentative!) about your philosophies of knowledge: Absolutist, Relativist, or Evaluativist? Domains Natural Science Social Science Art Morality Religion Item #s 1, 5, 14 4, 8, 12 3, 7, 10 6, 9, 11 2, 13, 15 YOUR Philo of K
    Relativist Absolutist Evaluativist Evaluativist Relativist

    Brief Reason + Remarks

    Part Two: Ways of Knowing How important are the different Ways of Knowing in the different domains? Rank them from 1 to 5 according to importance, with 1 as MOST IMPORTANT. If you think there are other ways of knowing/judging, use the last column and specify. Domains Natural Science Social Science Art Morality Religion Sense Perception
    1

    Reason

    Language

    Emotion

    Others?

    2 1 4 1 3

    3 3 3 4 2

    2 1 3 4

    4 2 2 1

    Part Three: AUTHORITY and/or EVIDENCE/ARGUMENT When you justify claims, how much do you actually rely on External Authority and Direct Evidence for every domain? Assign a percentage to each one per domain (Just make an estimate, so NO decimal points--e.g., 25.2321%!). Make sure both total 100%. Domains % % AUTHORITY EVIDENCE/
    ARGUMENT

    Brief Reason + Remarks

    Natural Science Social Science Art Morality Religion

    25% 75 20 10 80

    75 25 80 90 20

    100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    Why do you think there is no OPINION in Part Three?

    Some other learnings, comments, connections...

    You might also like