Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gas Dynamics Course Note
Gas Dynamics Course Note
Gas Dynamics Course Note
1. Introduction
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering
Some words on who we are An example of studies we make Outline of the course Preparation of next weeks lecture
CFS Engineering
Course notes (polycopies) are the ones prepared by Dr. Alain Drotz + copies of the powerpoint presentations on the website of LIN Please interrupt me to ask questions if something is not clear. Questions to me can be asked in English, French, German and Dutch Exercises: two of the course days are reserved for exercises in a computer room Exam: orally, on the last day we will explain how the exam will be done
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering (Computational Fluids & Structures) is a spin-off company created in 1999 and located at the Business park of EPFL (cole Polytechnique Fdrale de Lausanne) The major shareholder of CFS Engineering is RUAG Aerospace
Mission of CFS Engineering To offer services in the numerical simulation of Fluid Mechanics and Structural Mechanics problems
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering
CFS Engineering
10
CFS Engineering
11
CFS Engineering
12
CFS Engineering
13
CFS Engineering
14
CFS Engineering
15
FA-18 studies
RUAG Aerospace and CFS Engineering performed CFD simulations from 2001 to 2007 on the FA-18 fighter. 2001: Compare CFD with Wind tunnel experiments. 2002: Extract Aerodynamic loads from CFD and compare with the Boeing Loads data base 2003: Sensitivity analysis different aircraft configurations 2004: Develop tool for static wing deformation 2005: New grid, study influence LEX fence, unsteady CFD for loads 2006: Dynamic Fluid Structure Interaction, influence SIWA fins on loads 2007: Study of Vertical Tail Buffeting
CFS Engineering
16
ILEF
LEX
17
with and without weapons or fuel tanks various control surfaces deflections
generated by ICEM CFD Hexa contains ~ 14.0 Million grid points contains around 3000 blocks Replay files for control surface deflections and components addition or removal
To permit loads calculation on each aircraft component, CAD surface families Mesh topology
CFS Engineering
each aircraft component = single CAD surface family faces of a block = single CAD surface family
18
Cut on wing
CFS Engineering
19
CFS Engineering
20
10
Flow Features
Streamlines
Mach = 0.95
11
CFS Engineering
23
CFS Engineering
25
12
CFS Engineering
26
Transfer CSM grid deformation into CFD surface mesh displacement using FSCON
Fluid solution
CSM calculation
CFS Engineering 28
13
Transfer CSM grid deformation into CFD surface mesh displacement using FSCON
CSM calculation
CFS Engineering
29
Transfer CSM grid deformation into CFD surface mesh displacement using FSCON
Structural deformation
CSM calculation
CFS Engineering
30
14
deformed
Transfer CSM grid deformation into CFD surface mesh displacement using FSCON
CSM calculation
CFS Engineering 31
undeformed wing
deformed wing
CFS Engineering
32
15
CFS Engineering
33
Strategy:
Result of steady calculation used as initial solution Assume flow symmetric 0.5 seconds real time simulated Computing time in the order of 3 weeks (2005) Pressure and skin friction saved each time step Complete solution every 20 steps Amount of data generated in the order of 350 Gbyte per case
CFS Engineering
34
16
Mean value
CFS Engineering
35
CFS Engineering
38
17
CFS Engineering
39
Mode 3
Mode 4
CFS Engineering
40
18
For this case the flutter boundary has a flutter index of 0.32. Tests were made using different grid densities, different outer time steps, different time integration scheme, different values of the structural damping, different values of inner loop convergence criterium.
CFS Engineering 41
CFS Engineering
42
19
CFS Engineering
43
CFS Engineering
44
20
Flight results
Source: NASA
CFS Engineering
45
CFS Engineering
49
21
Which corresponds to the modules of the course given by Dr. Alain Drotz in previous years. We modified the course, less theory, more directed to the use of numerical methods in practice.
CFS Engineering
50
1. Introduction to the course (today) 2. 3D Euler equations 3. 1D Euler equations 4. Unsteady 1 dimensional flows 5. Introduction to the Riemann problem
CFS Engineering
51
22
6. Conservative discretization schemes 7. Exercises 8. Classical finite difference schemes 9. Riemann problem and Roe scheme
CFS Engineering
52
23
CFS Engineering
54
CFS Engineering
55
24
CFS Engineering
56
CFS Engineering
58
25
CFS Engineering
59
CFS Engineering
60
26
CFS Engineering
61
To summarize (1)
1. Compressible Euler equations: hyperbolic in time, unknowns are , u, v, w, E, 5 partial differential equations + 2 closure relations. Methods solving the compressible Euler (or Navier Stokes) equations are in general called density based. 2. Incompressible Euler equations: mixed parabolic-hyperbolic character, unknowns are p, u, v, w. The continuity equation is a constraint to find the pressure, and one can derive a pressure equation from the continuity and momentum equations. Methods for solving the incompressible Euler (or Navier Stokes equations) are often called pressure based due to the solution of a Poisson type equation for the pressure.
CFS Engineering
62
27
To summarize (2)
In the last 10 years convergence of the methods Incompressible, pressure based methods are extended to compressible flows by including density gradients in the formulation for the pressure equation Compressible, density based methods are extended incompressible flow regime using pre-conditioning techniques to the
CFS Engineering
63
Terminology (1)
Partial differential equation
Implicit scheme
CFS Engineering
64
28
Terminology (2)
Spatial discretization: central schemes vs upwind schemes. In the group of upwind schemes one has also TVD schemes and ENO schemes. Order of the schemes (spatial and/or in time): is linked to the truncation error of the numerical discretization. Examples: first order, second order, third order, etc. Weak solution: solution which permits discontinuities (shock waves, expansion waves) Numerical flux: discretization of the physical flux f(U) Limiter: is used with upwind schemes, and is a function of gradients to eliminate oscillations. May give an upwind scheme the TVD property Monotonic scheme: is represented by a monotonic decreasing or increasing function
CFS Engineering 65
Terminology (3)
Properties Total Variation Diminishing (TVD) schemes: Are monotonic Should in principle not generate oscillations near shock waves Are stable Up to higher order (depends partly on the limiters) Are first order near extrema Do not always satisfy the entropy condition and thus may lead to wrong solutions Are very suitable for flows with shock waves Do not always give good results for low Mach number and incompressible flows
CFS Engineering 66
29
Uncontrolled oscillations
CFS Engineering
67
Dissipation : smearing out of the solution due to the numerical viscosity introduced by the space discretization scheme
Dispersion : Lagging of the solution due to a numerical propagation velocity different from the exact one
CFS Engineering
68
30
Over/under shoots near shock and expansion waves which are typical for higher order schemes
Lax - Wendroff
69
31
CFS Engineering
71
Consistency: expresses that the discretized equations tend to the differential equations from which they are derived when t and x tend to zero
Convergence: the numerical solution should approach the exact solution of the partial differential equation at any point and at any time when t and x tend to zero (ie when the mesh is refined or the time step reduced)
CFS Engineering
72
32
Any questions ?
CFS Engineering
73
33