Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Extensive and Intensive Research
Extensive and Intensive Research
Extensive and Intensive Research
William Molnar
Think about extensive and intensive research. Remember, this is a research question, not a personal
one. Discuss “extensive” and “intensive” in terms of research.
1. For each, describe the benefits and drawbacks that are most salient to you.
There are both benefits and drawbacks that are salient to me in using intensive
and extensive research. At the methodological level, Sayer is careful to describe the
differences between the extensive techniques required for generalization and the intensive
methods associated with concrete research (Sayer 1992, 241-251). Sayer states that the
nature of the object of interest must be kept in the back of the mind when designing
concrete research. The questions surrounding intensive research versus extensive research
do differ although, according to Sayer, the distinction is more along the scale of depth
versus breadth. Intensive research is concerned with causal process and how it works out
common, concerns itself with finding out common properties and patterns of a population
as a whole. Extensive research methods include descriptive and inferential statistics along
with numerical analysis. In addition, it includes a questionnaire that is formal and large-
Each research design also works with different conceptions of groups. For
example, in extensive research, the focus is mainly on groups that share similar
characteristics but don’t have the need to connect with each other. Each member of the
group is only of interest in the fact that they represent the population as a whole.
Intensive research however, focuses on groups whose members can be similar or different
but do relate to each other. The individual’s identity is of interest. A causality is studied
2
William Molnar
by exploring actual connections. The criteria of the samples must be decided in advance
But in intensive studies, the individual do not have to be typical and can be selected one
by one during the research procedure. In intensive research, the researcher does not have
to specify the entire design and who or what is going to be studied in advance; this can be
established as the research is progressing so that this allows the researcher to learn about
the object in question and gives them the opportunity to create a picture of the structures
and the causal groups they are a part of. In extensive research, the use of a standardized
questionnaire and interview surveys is possible because by asking each individual the
same question under a controlled condition, then a comparison is possible and bias is kept
to a minimum. For this reason, where extensive research may rely on standardized
interviews, in which each interview subject might lead the researcher to the next subject,
may be preferred. The result is an explanation of events that may not be generalizable to
other cases, but which provides an explanation of the causes of the case in question.
Unfortunately, when applying this process to characteristic samples of social science such
‘representativeness’ and getting a large enough sample. Sayer makes it a point to state
that consistency that disregards the differences in types of respondents can make
comparisons meaningless because the researcher does not realize that the same question
can have a different significance to a different person. If the researcher uses a less
standardized kind of interview, he/she will increase their chances at learning from the
3
William Molnar
interviewee what the different significances of circumstances are for them. Using a less
standardized interview does not force the interviewee to respond into what Sayer calls a
“one-way mode of communication”. Using a less standardized interview also allows the
There are different types of tests that are appropriate only for intensive or
how the findings are in the wider population and to decide if the discovery of results
apply to the individual that were studied. Sayer gives an example of an intensive study at
an institution. He states that the researcher should connect with others at that institution
to agree with the information about common practices. But then to test in another
Sayer states the extensive studies are weaker because of the formal
discovery within the relations with regards to similarity, dissimilarity, and correlation, as
reason for this difficulty of determining causality is due to the “interactions between
objects that are often recorded in a total or whole made up of different parts in which the
Additionally, extensive methods abstract from the “actual forms” that individuals or
processes interact even though these processes cause a difference to the outcomes. As a
result, few social scientists, in relation to the explanations of specific phenomena that
extract from form, do not recognize the problem although variations in form are an
points out, to look concretely at the production of events would require a very selective
intensive research design. The problem can be reduced by spatially separating the
Intensive research does have its disadvantages. To avoid the “ecological fallacy”,
it must be mentioned that the roles are not representative of the whole population.
studies, the research design needs to avoid the belief that the study of any individual is
research tend to argue that intensive research does not produce objective results because
simultaneously, I believe that if possible, both research designs should be used at the
same time. Each of their roles, though different, is more complementary rather than
competing. As I have stated earlier, a positive attribute in intensive research is the fact
that the researcher does not have to specify the entire design and who or what is going to
be studied in advance; this can be established as the research is progressing so that this
allows the researcher to learn about the object in question and gives them the opportunity
to create a picture of the structures and the causal groups they are a part of. Extensive
research is weaker for the purpose of explanation not because they lack a sensitivity to
detail, but because the discovery of relations are “formal, concerning, similarity,
dissimilarity, correlation, and the like, rather than causal, structural, and substantial, i.e.
extracting from form, it is recognized in a way that the researcher does not generate any
inappropriate analogies with closed system natural science. If very concrete explanations
of events are required, using intensive research designs become extremely helpful. In
regards to intensive studies, there is no need for a great level of detail that is
overwhelming because the individuals that do not interact with the group can be excluded
Not all causal groups are small and have nonphysical boundaries and change
radically during the study. Sayer stated that in intensive research, although it does not
provide a pretence that the whole populations is represented does not lend itself to reason
why intensive studies should be any less objective about its subject matter than extensive
research. Because social structure exists on many scales, “intensive studies of their
reproduction, transformation and effects need not be merely local in their interest” (p
249). Extensive methods can also be used on a small and large scale. Extensive methods
produce representative results but the question remains a representation of what? Both
intensive and extensive research methods are needed in concrete research although
extensive research usually becomes undervalued. Many scientists are reluctant to admit
that more is gained through intensive studies in terms of examination because they fear
phenomenon under a controlled experimental condition warrants the use of both intensive
research and the research design must account of the things it has to explain.
6
William Molnar
Reference
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2bd ed,). London
and New York: Routledge.