Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problems Prospects of Coop Movement 1986 Pres.
Problems Prospects of Coop Movement 1986 Pres.
People empowerment is the correct path in solving the problems of poverty and income inequity. It is the process of transferring economic and social power from one center to another and/or the creation of a new center complementary to or in competition with the traditional center (H. Morales).
Cooperatives and other labor enterprises are among the major pillars of the people empowerment movement (Sibal, 1991). This movement aspires for a strong propeople mixed economic society where the state, private and civil society sectors are harnessed in the development efforts of the society.
1st phase (Japanese occupation)- rapid increase in cooperatives as a result of food shortages 2nd phase- Rehabilitation period after WW II 3rd phase- Resurgence of the state-initiated coops)
1998 party list elections, elected 3 sectoral representatives 2010, 5 Party list representatives in the Philippine Congress
Various cooperative laws were codified under RA 6938 in 1990 and amended by RA 9520 in 2009.
The coop movements involvement in parliamentary struggle avoided politization and too much state intervention under the principle of subsidiarity. Operating coops increased by 393 percent from 1983 to 1993, and by 540 percent from 1993 to 2009.
The coops businesses shifted to higher value added multi-purpose coops and its total assets leaped from a measly P1.05 Billion in 1985 to P176 Billion in 2009. The movements contribution to the countrys GDP has reached 5.14 percent in 2007.
The focus of President PNoy Aquinos Philippine Development Plan is an inclusive growth strategy. It means active participation of the citizenry in the countrys growth and a major beneficiary at the same time (ILO, 2010). It is focused in maximizing job creation in reducing poverty. Hence, the role of the cooperative sector is a vital component in this national endeavor.
3.4
30
129
280
1,503
118,400
176,020
Capital (million)
n.a.
n.a.
129
194
627
--
--
Sources: 1939-1985- Gray Wine Think Tank, 1993- CDA, 2009- CDA & DOF *1993 (Braid) & 2009 membership covers only confirmed coops
The total registered cooperatives increased dramatically by 7.5 times from 1985 to 1993 compared to an increase of only a little over 3 times from 1993 to 2009 (Table 1 & Chart 1).
The performance of operating cooperatives increased by 3.9 times from 1985 to 1993, and 5.3 times from 1993 to 2009. This means that more cooperatives are becoming viable after they are registered in 1993-2009 compared to those registered in 1985-1993.
The increases in the number of operating cooperatives were bigger in multipurpose cooperatives at 790 percent in 2009, followed by services at 448 percent, producers at 316 percent and marketing at 235 percent. Credit was steady at 157 percent in 2009 (Table 1). Cooperatives now engage in higher value processes compared to lower value processes involved in credit and consumer store operations.
Compared to the first and second stages of the coop movement where the government initiated and organized coops for political and anti-insurgency purposes, the third stage of the coop movement avoided these past mistakes with the government supporting the movement with emphasis on the principle of subsidiarity or non-interference on internal coop affairs.
Cooperatives during the third stage of the coop movement became more viable and productive. There were lesser coop failures. The operating coops grew rapidly since the total assets of the coop movement leaped from a measly P1.05 Billion in 1985 to P118.4 Billion in 1995, and to P176 Billion in 2009.
Table 4. Total Assets of Operating Cooperatives (2009) Category of Coop No. of Coops % to Assets Total No. of Coops 83.7% 10.9% 4.4% P 7.88 Billion P 17.59 Billion P 37.83 Billion % to Total Assets 4.5% 10.0% 21.5%
Micro (up to P3 19,961 Million) Small (P3 to 2,594 P15 Million) Medium (P15 1,015 to P100 Million) Large (Over P100 Million) Totals
Source: CDA and DOF
230 23,836
1.0% 100.0%
64.0% 100.0%
Micro coops dominate the coop sector at 84 percent. If combined with small coops, their numbers reach up to 95 percent. Their assets however total only 14.5 percent compared to the large coops which number only 1 percent but own 64 percent of the total assets.
The good thing about this is that micro coops, even with small capitalization, are able to provide more jobs to the poor. Large coops, on the other hand are able to engage in higher value production processes as shown in Tables 3 and 4.
The concept of big brother, small brother cooperation among cooperatives is necessary. Federation and union work has now become very crucial in furthering the growth of the coop movement. Big coop primaries and federations need to merge or consolidate like the NATCCOMASS-SPECC consolidation plan in 2012.
The big coops, acting as big brothers, need to harness the capabilities of micro and small coops by technology transfers and joint cooperative business ventures like the MICOOP program of the NATCCO. Other new trends in coop business ventures include branding of coop products and services, franchising or networking arrangements, or even outsourcing.
Davao (Region XI) highlights the coop movements successes in the regions.
leads in coop membership at 54.4% of the population of 19 years old and above. with 1.2 million members, it has an average coop membership of 523 per cooperative contributed nine percent to the regions GDP, following Socsargen (Region XII) at 12% contribution to the regional GDP and Western Visayas (Region VI) at 4.5% contribution to the regional GDP (Tables 5 and 6).
Bicol (Region V) and Southern Tagalog (Region IV) are the least performers in coop membership and in regional contribution to GDP. Region IV is a fast growing region in manufacturing and services, hence coops cannot compare with the output of big manufacturing enterprises. Bicol region, being a depressed region in terms of manufacturing, needs more intense coop development to help empower the poor.
Table 5- Membership of Operating Cooperatives Source: CDA and DOF by Region, 2009 (Top 5 and Bottom 3) * Population of 19 years old and above
Member-ship
Region
Top 5
XI- Davao
IX- Zamboanga II- Cagayan CAR
1,201,830
321,917 245,640 124,130
523
321 283 166
54.5%
20.6% 14.64% 14.61%
1
2 3 4
NCR
Lowest 3 V- Bicol VII- Western Visayas IV- Southern Tagalog Philippines
780,555
145,440 238,770 497,085 5,856,074
297
195 124 234 246
13.95%
5.55% 6.37% 6.80% 13.04%
5
(1)
Table 6- Cooperative Contribution to the GDP, 2007 using the income approach Region Top 5 Regions XII- Socsargen VI- Western Visayas XI- Davao X- Northern Mindanao 11.91% 11.49% 9.07% 8.89% 1 2 3 4 Percent contribution to regional GDP Rank
CARAGA
Lowest 3 Regions V- Bicol IV- Southern Tagalog
7.45%
1.43% 1.55%
5
1 2
1.84%
5.14%
1. Lack of education and training[1] 2. Lack of capital 3. Inadequate volume of business 4. Lack of loyal membership support 5. Vested interest and graft and corruption among coop leaders 6. Weak leadership and mismanagement 7. Lack of government support
*From more than 80 researches which assessed the growth and
development of coops which included the studies of Emmanuel Velasco, the Cooperative Foundation of the Philippines, Inc. (CFPI) and Leandro Rola (1989).
Quality growth Consolidation Differentiation Social relevance National, market presence Poor image- The image of coops is small, inefficient, individual performers with low standard of service, or an image of a jeepney.
A large number of cooperatives remain unviable. Only 23,836 or 30 percent of the 78,611 registered coops in 2009 are reporting/operating.
There is a need to further strengthen coop education and training through the coop federations, councils and unions, NGO training centers, state colleges and universities, etc.
Under RA 9520, all officers (including directors) are required to undergo training conducted by cooperatives, federations and/or other trainers or training institutions duly accredited by CDA.
The training modules/curricula prescribed by CDA are: Basic Cooperative Course; Cooperative Management and Governance; Policy Development; Financial Management; Parliamentary Procedure; Leadership and Values Re-Orientation; Strategic Planning; and Labor and Other Related Laws.
Planning Secretary Cayetano Paderanga- Cooperative development would create jobs and spread wealth. The coop movement can capitalize on the current boom in the microfinancing business. DSWD Secretary Dinky Soliman is on top of the anti-poverty program of the government.
Strengthen all LGU Development Councils and exhort strong coop participation; Work for the creation of Cooperative Development Offices in all LGUs that have not yet created said office and the corresponding appointments of the LGU Cooperative Development Officers ideally coming from the coop sector;
Strengthen the Cooperative Development Councils at the national, regional, provincial, municipal and barangay levels; Participate in LGU affairs through involvement in the LGU Pre-Bids and Awards Committees (PBAC), the Local Health and School Boards, to participate in future elections of sectoral representatives for workers, women and other sectors in the LGU councils, and to lobby for the creation of committees on cooperatives in said councils if not yet created.
References:
Barce, Jo Anne, 1995, The Effects of Education in Membership Participation in Cooperative Activities, QC: UP SOLAIR (unpublished paper). Borja, Ignacio, 1996, Cooperative Education: Problem or Answer, paper presented at the first National Convention of the National Association for Cooperative Education (NACE), August 8-9, 1996, Hotel Danarra and Resort, QC. Braid, Rosario (Ed), 1993, Political Parties, Programs and Platforms for Cooperatives as a Third Sector, Sustainable Development Through Cooperatives, Manila: Asian Institute of Journalism, p. 136. COOP NATCCO, 2007, website- : http://www.natcco.coop , (opened August 4, 2011) Coloma, Teresita, 1996 The Cooperative Development Framework: A Blueprint for People Empowerment and Global Competitiveness, paper presented at the National Conference Workshop on Strengthening Cooperative Banks, February 21-22, 1996 at Great Eastern Hotel, QC.
References:
Cooperatives Philippines, 2011, http://cooperativessociety.blogspot.com/2011/03/p-noys-govts-development-plan-lists.html Gonzales, Araceli, The NGOs, their Impact to the IR Environment, UP SOLAIR, QC (unpublished paper). ILO, 2010, Overcoming the jobs crisis and shaping an inclusive recovery: the Philippines in the aftermath of the global economic turmoil (forthcoming). Moralez, Horacio, Strategies and Mechanisms for Empowerment of People in the Rural Sector, Lambatlaya, QC: UP ISWD, p. 2. Ong, Jose, 1997, Market Projects Financed by Municipal Development Fund: An Evaluation, Philippine Womens University-Quezon City, September 1997 (masteral thesis). Paderanga, Cayetano, 2011, Keynote Speech, PICPA's "Cooperative Forum Day," July 22, 2011, Hotel Intercontinental, Makati City,
References:
Remo, Amy, 2011, NEA, DBP to finance co-ops fund requirements, Philippine Daily Inquirer, July 11, 2011. Rola, Leandro, 1989 Cooperative Education and Training Issues/Problems and Recommendations, The State of Cooperative Development in the Philippines, QC: Cooperative Foundation of the Philippines, Inc. Santiaguel, Mannie, 2011, The Role of Cooperative in Poverty Reduction, cooperativeunionofcavite.com/.../The%20Role%20of%20Cooperatives%20In %20Global%20Poverty... (opned Aug. 201) Scott, William, 1992, The Union Obrera Democratica: The First Filipino Labor Union, QC: New Day Publishers. Sibal, Jorge, 1991, The Self-managed Enterprises and the Vision of a Mixed Economy, paper read at the PEDF Seminar-Workshop on Issues in Community Enterprise Management, August 16-18, 1991, Pansol, Laguna sponsored by Peoples Enterprise Development Council. Sibal, Jorge, 2001, A Century of the Philippine Cooperative Movement, Co-op News from UWCC, University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, August 2001, http://www.wisc.edu/uwcc Wikipedia, 2011, Fiscal Policy in the Philippines, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_policy_of_the_Philippines (Opened Aug. 2011)