This peer assessment form provides criteria to evaluate student posters about historians and their work. The form includes boxes to rate the layout and content of each poster as great, good, so-so, or could be better. Students are assessed on how well they organize their poster, explain what historians do and how they collect evidence from primary and secondary sources to write about the past.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This peer assessment form provides criteria to evaluate student posters about historians and their work. The form includes boxes to rate the layout and content of each poster as great, good, so-so, or could be better. Students are assessed on how well they organize their poster, explain what historians do and how they collect evidence from primary and secondary sources to write about the past.
This peer assessment form provides criteria to evaluate student posters about historians and their work. The form includes boxes to rate the layout and content of each poster as great, good, so-so, or could be better. Students are assessed on how well they organize their poster, explain what historians do and how they collect evidence from primary and secondary sources to write about the past.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This peer assessment form provides criteria to evaluate student posters about historians and their work. The form includes boxes to rate the layout and content of each poster as great, good, so-so, or could be better. Students are assessed on how well they organize their poster, explain what historians do and how they collect evidence from primary and secondary sources to write about the past.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Class : _____________ Student Number: ____________ Tick the box you think best describes the poster you are assessing… Lay Out Content Great! Your poster was organised, you used a You explained clearly what do whole page evenly and it was easy to historians do and how they understand. It had a colourful picture collect information to write and an interesting title. Your about the past. You used the handwriting was clear. terminology like, evidence, primary and secondary source, artefact, monument, etc., correctly and also explained how useful and reliable is each kind of evidence for this work. Good! Your poster was organised and you You explained what historians used the page evenly, your do and briefly described the way handwriting was easy to understand. It they collect information to write had a colourful picture but the title about the past. You used some was not very interesting. terminology like, evidence, primary and secondary source, artefact, monument, etc., but you didn’t explain how useful and reliable is each kind of evidence for this work. So, So! Your poster was not well distributed You wrote information of the on the paper. Your handwriting was way historians collect not clear and that made it difficult to information about the past and understand. It had a picture and a title. you mentioned briefly what they do with what they gathered, using some appropriate terminology. Could be Your poster was messy and your You wrote some information of better! handwriting was not very clear. It had the way historians collect a title but no picture. information about the past, but didn’t mention how they use what they gathered. You didn’t use the terminology correctly.