Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Low Vs High Performance Culture (FCC)

    Uploaded by

    cotk12
    This document contrasts the characteristics of low and high performance cultures in organizations. A low performance culture is described as having an unclear vision, a focus on control and structure, turf issues between teams, an emphasis on status and hierarchy, and risk aversion. In contrast, a high performance culture is characterized by a clear shared vision, frank discussions regardless of hierarchy, cross-boundary collaboration, feedback that challenges others constructively, risk awareness by reframing threats as challenges, good information flow even of bad news, accountability, and clear roles and responsibilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Low Vs High Performance Culture (FCC)

    Uploaded by

    cotk12
    2K views1 page
    This document contrasts the characteristics of low and high performance cultures in organizations. A low performance culture is described as having an unclear vision, a focus on control and structure, turf issues between teams, an emphasis on status and hierarchy, and risk aversion. In contrast, a high performance culture is characterized by a clear shared vision, frank discussions regardless of hierarchy, cross-boundary collaboration, feedback that challenges others constructively, risk awareness by reframing threats as challenges, good information flow even of bad news, accountability, and clear roles and responsibilities.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Low vs High Performance Culture (FCC)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contrasts the characteristics of low and high performance cultures in organizations. A low performance culture is described as having an unclear vision, a focus on control and structure, turf issues between teams, an emphasis on status and hierarchy, and risk aversion. In contrast, a high performance culture is characterized by a clear shared vision, frank discussions regardless of hierarchy, cross-boundary collaboration, feedback that challenges others constructively, risk awareness by reframing threats as challenges, good information flow even of bad news, accountability, and clear roles and responsibilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    2K views1 page

    Low Vs High Performance Culture (FCC)

    Uploaded by

    cotk12
    This document contrasts the characteristics of low and high performance cultures in organizations. A low performance culture is described as having an unclear vision, a focus on control and structure, turf issues between teams, an emphasis on status and hierarchy, and risk aversion. In contrast, a high performance culture is characterized by a clear shared vision, frank discussions regardless of hierarchy, cross-boundary collaboration, feedback that challenges others constructively, risk awareness by reframing threats as challenges, good information flow even of bad news, accountability, and clear roles and responsibilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Context

    LOW PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE


    CULTURE CULTURE
    • Unclear vision • Clear vision to which staff give their all
    • Focus on control/structure • Frank discussions are had
    • Turf issues • ‘Cross-boundary’ collaboration
    • Emphasis on status and • People give & receive feedback/
    hierarchy challenge each other regardless of
    • Risk averse hierarchy
    • Risk aware - there is no ‘need’ to
    • Poor information flow cover up, threats are reframed as
    challenges
    • Lack of accountability • Good information flow even when
    news is ‘bad’
    • Unclear roles &
    responsibilities • People admit & learn from mistakes
    • Clear roles, responsibilities
    1

    You might also like