728.22 (497.

11) "18/19"
711.4 (497.11)

-,

19.
20.

, ,
, ,
.
,
,

,
,

.1

,
.

.2
,
,
,
.
,
, ,
. ,
,
- .

117

 -,

. 1. ,
66, 1876.
. 2. 49, 1880.

, ,
,
,

, , .3

, , .

,4

,
, ,
, .
,

. , ,
- ,
, ,

.

e ,
,
.5 ,
,

.
, , .
,


, .6
(urban renewal),
(ICOMOS,
1977), , ,
, , , . ,
(urban reconstruction)
.7

,
,
118


,
.
- , ,
.

(integrative protection).8
9
, ,10
.

,
, ,

.
,
,
,
, ,
.11
,
, :
-


, ;
-

, ;
- ,

,
. 12
,

.
,
, , ,
119

. 3. . -,
30, .
. 19041905.

. 4.
55, 1906. 2003.
.
,
.
:
; ; , .
, .13

 -,

. 5. 28, 1910.
, .
, ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
.
, , ,
,

.


, .
, , , ,
. ,
, ,
genius loci. 14

, .

,
.

,

. ,
,

.
,
,
, .
(place) ,
(space) .15
,
, . ,

. ,
,
,
,
. ,

.16


(, 1976),

, ,

.
.17
,
,
, ,
.

,


.
,
,
.
120


,
, , ,
, .
,
, ,
.
,

.

, ,
, ,
,
, . 18

19. 20.
,


,
,
. , ,
.
,
,
.

,

.19
, ,
, , ,
,
.
, ,
,
, ,
.


. ,
,
121

. 6. 41, 1900,

. 7. 41,

 -,

,
,
,
.

,
,20

,
,
, .
,

.
,
. 8. .
21, 1914,

,

, .21
, ,
,
, - , ;

,
; , , .
,
, ,



.22



2021.
,
, , ,
.
,

.23

,

: ,
,

.
,

.
,
, ,
,
, ,
122


,
.
.24

,
- ,
. ,

,

.
, ,

.



. 9. .
21,

123

.

2021.
,
20. .25
, , ,
, 19.
20. , ,

,
.
,
-


.26
. (

, ,

), .
,

,
.




.

,

20. ( , , , ,
),
,
,
, , .
,

,

. ,

 -,

. 10. 16,

.
,

,
(
, , .),
.

19. 20.
,

.
,27 , (,
, , , .)
-

. ,
,
,


, ,
, , .

, ,
.28



.
,
.
, ,
-

.

,
, , .
,
,
( , ,
, .)
( . , , ,
, , .),
(
, ).
,
.


(, , ).

. ,

.
124

. 11. 18,
,
,
.
.

,
, .

.
, ,
.29
,
,
,
,
,
.
,

,
.


.

125

,

.

.



,
.
,
,

.

,
.

, ,
, .
,

,

,

.


, .

,

,
,
,
, .

, ,

.
,


.

 -,

,
,
, ,


.

, , ,
( , ,
.) .

126


:
1]
1972, 1992.
1996. ,
. : Evropske
konvencije i preporuke u oblasti kulturnog naslea, EXPEDITIO, Kotor,
2005.
2] : . , ,
, . 26 (2002), 2426; ,
, , . 28 (2004), 1011.
3] . Norberg-Schulz, Stanovanje,
kua,Graevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1990.

stanite,

urbani

prostor,

4] . Jukilehto, A History of Architectural Conservation, ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, 2002 (I ed. 1999).

5] . , , 23.
6] : Odrivost i grad, Arhitektonski fakultet, Beograd, 1999;
Stanovanje ka III milenijumu, ed. Arhitektonika, monografija 11,
Arhitektonski fakultet, Beograd, 2001; Preispitivanje pojma odrivi
razvoj u planiranju, projektovanju i graenju, ed. Arhitektonika,
monografija 12, Arhitektonski fakultet, Beograd, 2002.
7] . , , I,
, , , 2004, 190.
8]

. : N. Kurtovi-Foli, R. Jadrein-Muli, Integrativna
zatita graditeljskog naslea generator odrivog urbanog razvoja, I
deo, u: Preispitivanje pojma odrivi razvoj u planiranju, projektovanju i
graenju, 57, 70.
9] 1975.
(European Charter of the Architectural Heritage)
. : . ,
, 2526; ,
, 11.
10] (integrative
conservation) (integrative
protection),
,
(protection, preservation),
(conservation),
, (ICOMOS, 1977).
: . , , 188, 190.
11] 7 . : J.
Jukileto, , 23; ,
, 11.
12] . , , 197.
13] J. Jukileto,
, 9.
14] Norberg-Schulz, Ch. Building in Old Settings as a Problem of
Place, in: New Building in Old Settings, Munich, 1978, pp. 1113.
15] , 13.
16] .
17] J. Jukileto,
, 13.
18]
1994.
, () (). : . ,
, , . 26 (2002), 1112, 14.

127

19] J. Jukileto,
, 1213.
20] Regionalni prostorni plan administrativnog podruja Beograda, 1.
faza strategija zatite, urbanog ureenja i razvoja, 2002, 5, 11, 12,
13.
21] , 54.
22] , 124125.
23] :
Nacrt Genaralnog plana Beograda 2021, Urbanistiki zavod Beograda
JP, Beograd, 2002, 159167.
24] 2021.

- ;
35 ;
197 . -
, , 110.
25] 1906.
,
( ),
. (
) . : .
, 18301914, ,
1970, 315.
2021.
, , , ,
. . : Nacrt
Genaralnog plana Beograda 2021, 162.
26] ( ).

- ( ,
). : Nacrt Genaralnog
plana Beograda 2021, 161163.
27] 43 1914. ( , 11 ).
. : Nacrt Genaralnog
plana Beograda 2021, 19.
28] 19.
20.
: 17, 32; 22, 24, 7;
21; 50; 11;
18; 27; 59, 71, 73;
42, 44, 55; 49; 28;
41, 56, 64; 16; 12;
42; 24; 3, 8, 7, 9; 7;
52; 66; 28, 30, 34;
28, 29, 30, 34, 32, 38; 17, 19, 39; 4, 32, 34,
6; . : . -,
19. 20. ,
-, , 2006.
29] , , , ,

, ,
,
,
.

. : D. Arnold, Reading Architectural History,
Routledge, London, 2002.

 -,
Summary: MIRJANA ROTER-BLAGOJEVI,
MARKO NIKOLI
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRESERVATION OF IDENTITY AND AUTHENTICITY DURING THE
PROCESS OF URBAN PLANNING RECONSTRUCTION OF A CITY THE ROLE OF RESIDENTIAL
ARCHITECTURE OF BELGRADE IN THE LATE XIX AND EARLY XX CENTURY FOR THE FORMATION
OF CHARACTER OF HISTORICAL AMBIENCES
Contemporary attitude towards cultural and architectural heritage, formulated in international charters and
recommendations concerning the preservation and protection of cultural heritage, implies that the need for humane and
sustainable development of the environment is to be observed during the process of urban planning reconstruction. Such
development means striking the balance between traditional way of life and present day potentials, social justice and
consideration for following generations and natural environment. Modern view of preservation of cultural and architectural
heritage implies that in historical quarters of cities more attention should be paid to the use of space over time, to be precise,
continuity of function and relations which gather together individual buildings into an urban context; they should not be
viewed merely as material remains of buildings as was often the case in the past.
Throughout history urban planning and reconstruction have often been two separate processes aimed at different
objectives; however, at present the belief prevails that these processes need to be integrated and that the primary goal of
urban reconstruction is to find how to put to best use the existing urban structures so as to satisfy present and future needs.
This is the reason why integrative approach to the reconstruction of cities requires that intervention in old city centres or
cultural-historical ensembles be holistic, enabling old urban areas to begin new existence in keeping with modern conditions,
standards and quality of life.
Modern urban development led to the formation of uniformed appearance of cities, with similar spatial and architectural
characteristics stemming from similar living and cultural customs of modern urban population. Globalization had negative
impact on the tissue of old urban spaces changing its traditional morphology and typology of construction. In spite of this,
historical parts of the city with preserved old buildings still contain, although in poor condition, the qualities subsumed
under terms authentic, autochthonous, original, unique and irreplaceable. When talking about the authenticity of these parts,
we mean their specific distinctive character, their spirit.
With its rich cultural and architectural heritage, Serbian capital, after several decades of stagnation of building
construction within the historical city core, gained pace with general trends of contemporary development of historical
centres at a fast rate and, we can say, in a chaotic and uncontrolled manner. Modern urbanization probably hit the hardest
old peripheral residential parts of the city from the late XIX and early XX century which are usually not valued as significant
cultural and architectural heritage. Nevertheless, these parts of cities play a significant part in terms of preservation and
protection of cultural heritage since they contain testimonials of traditional forms of city life, material and nonmaterial
traces of culture and creation of preceding generations. Together with the buildings also disappears nonmaterial cultural
legacy, character and the attitude toward the use of space, as well as specific social relations which gave them special
meaning and spirit. In this way also disappears the traditional identity of individual parts of the city built into collective
memory of its dwellers.

ILLUSTRATIONS
Fig. 1. The House of contractor Ernest Gajsler, at 66 Svetozara Markovia Street, built in 1876.

Fig. 6. The house at 41 King Milans Street, built around 1900, condemned

Fig. 2. The house at 49 Prince Milo Street, built around 1880.

Fig. 8. The house of Lj. Trandafilovi at 21 Boulevard of Liberation,

built before 1914, condemned

Fig. 3. The house of colonel M. Andjelkovi-Kajafa, at 30 Smiljanieva

Street, designed by architect Vladislav Dj. Klinkovski, 1904-05.
Fig. 4. The house of innkeeper Milan Trandafilovi at 55 Njegoeva
Street, built in 1906, torn down in 2003.
Fig. 5. The house at 28 Prince Miletas Street, from 1910.

Fig. 7. The house at 41 King Milans Street, back facade

Fig. 9. The house of Lj. Trandafilovi at 21 Boulevard of Liberation,

back facade
Fig. 10. The house at 16 King Milutins Street, faade detail
Fig. 11. The house at 18 Ilije Garaanina Street, faade detail

128