Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) : An Effective Tool For Mortality Prediction in Surgical Patients

    Uploaded by

    Frontiers
    This document summarizes a study that evaluated the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) as a tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients. The study assessed 300 surgical patients at a hospital in Pakistan using the SRS scoring system, which incorporates ASA grade, BUPA, and CEPOD scores. Results showed higher SRS scores correlated with higher mortality rates. The researchers concluded that the SRS is an effective tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) : An Effective Tool For Mortality Prediction in Surgical Patients

    Uploaded by

    Frontiers
    9 views13 pages
    This document summarizes a study that evaluated the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) as a tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients. The study assessed 300 surgical patients at a hospital in Pakistan using the SRS scoring system, which incorporates ASA grade, BUPA, and CEPOD scores. Results showed higher SRS scores correlated with higher mortality rates. The researchers concluded that the SRS is an effective tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    tmp7B3C

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a study that evaluated the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) as a tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients. The study assessed 300 surgical patients at a hospital in Pakistan using the SRS scoring system, which incorporates ASA grade, BUPA, and CEPOD scores. Results showed higher SRS scores correlated with higher mortality rates. The researchers concluded that the SRS is an effective tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views13 pages

    Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) : An Effective Tool For Mortality Prediction in Surgical Patients

    Uploaded by

    Frontiers
    This document summarizes a study that evaluated the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) as a tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients. The study assessed 300 surgical patients at a hospital in Pakistan using the SRS scoring system, which incorporates ASA grade, BUPA, and CEPOD scores. Results showed higher SRS scores correlated with higher mortality rates. The researchers concluded that the SRS is an effective tool for predicting mortality in surgical patients.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 13

    SURGICAL RISK SCALE ( SRS ) :

    AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR


    MORTALITY PREDICTION
    IN SURGICAL PATIENTS.

    Muhammad Saaiq, M Rahim Bhurgri , Syed Aslam Shah

    DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY,
    Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad.
    Presented at: Meeting of the Society of Surgeons / Islamabad and
    Rawalpindi chapter
    ♦ September 17, 2005.
    WHY DO WE WANT
    RISK ASSESSMENT
    IN OUR PATIENTS ?
    SCORING SYSTEMS FOR
    RISK ASSESSMENT :
    1) Disease specific scoring
    systems.
    2 ) Generic scoring systems.
    APACHE , POSSUM etc.
    SRS SCORING SYSTEM :

    A combination of the following systems:

    1) ASA grade
    2) BUPA =
    3) CEPOD =
    OUR STUDY
    Study design : Descriptive study.
    Place : Department of Surgery, PIMS.
    Duration : Sept. 2004 to Feb. 2005.
    Sample size : 300 patients.
    Inclusion criteria : ………………
    Exclusion criteria :
    Children < 14
    Pts managed conservatively
    Procedure : ……………………..
    AGE DISTRIBUTION (n=300)

    100
    80
    60
    No.
    40
    20
    0
    14- 21- 31- 41- 51- 61- 71-
    20 30 40 50 60 70 80
    AGE
    SEX DISTRIBUTION (n=300)

    Male
    40%
    Female
    60%
    0
    10
    20
    30
    40
    50
    He
    Ap r nia
    60 55
    pe
    T h nd .
    yr
    oid
    .
    43 40

    La
    T u p.
    38

    be
    T.
    M
    17

    RM
    He
    m
    Ile rd.
    o.
    Re
    C v.
    M ho
    i sc l e
    .M .
    M
    13 11 10 10

    isc ajo
    .M r
    18

    ino
    r
    45
    INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES ( n=300 )
    SRS SCORES AND MORTALITIES AMONG THE PATIENTS (n=300)

    SRS SCORE No OF PTs (%) MORTALITY (%)

    3 40 (13.33) Nil
    4 25 (08.33) -
    5 24 (8.00) -
    6 67 (22.33) -
    7 73 (24.33) -

    8 23 (7.66) -
    9 8 (2.66) -
    10 24 (8.00) 2 (8.3%)
    11 9 (3.00) 2 (22.22%)
    12 4 (1.33) 2 (50 %)
    13 3 ( 1.00) 3 (100 %)
    14 Nil Nil
    RELATIONSHIP B/W SRS SCORE AND MORTALITY

    100
    80
    60
    40
    20
    0
    1

    11

    13
    CONCLUSION
    THANK YOU

    You might also like