The Dutch physicist, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1833-1928), in measuring the relative magnitude of the single negative ("moving"

or "orbital") electron charge, and the positive ("stationary" or "nuclear") proton charge in the hydrogen atom, actually claimed the two to be slightly unequal, with the proton possessing an excess positive charge, slightly greater than the allegedly 'equal and opposite' negative electron charge. This information has been conveniently disregarded, since, by implication, it contradicts the Relativist Theory, since unequal charges could disqualify the entire theory, and support Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity.

Lorentz further postulated that this excess positive charge is responsible for the weak force of gravity, and that, by increasing the negative (moving) charges, the gravity of an atom's stationary nuclear positive mass would be entirely "canceled". Even so, how would this explain electropulsion? It wouldn't Lorentz calculated the electromagnetic forces encountered by a body, within an electric and magnetic field, according to the equations of Sir George Clerk Maxwell. This force, called a "Lorentz Force", is so much more powerful than the force of gravity, that it is difficult to conceive.