Why Rules?: - To Create Uniformity - To Ensure Out Put - To

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

WHY RULES?

• TO CREATE UNIFORMITY

• TO ENSURE OUT PUT


• TO ENSURE PEACEFUL
WORKING ENVIRONMENT
DISCIPLINE
WHAT IS DISCIPLINE?

Condition in an organization
where the employees
conduct themselves in
accordance with the
organizations rules and
standards of acceptable
behavior.
CHOICES
Creative excitement

Heartfelt commitment

Cheerful cooperation

Willing compliance

Malicious obedience

Rebel or quit
RFS 2000

• WHY RFS 2000 AND NOT


2002?
• IS IT STILL AN
ORDINANCE?

• WHAT IS SO SPECIAL
ABOUT IT?
APPLICABILITY
• TO ALL THE FEDERAL GOVT.
EMPLOYEES EXCEPT JUDJES
• TO ALL THE CORPORATIONS’
EMPLOYEES, BE THEY ON
CONTRACT, PROBATION OR
REGULAR, IF THE CORPS R
BEING CONTROLLED BY FED.
GOVT.
MISCONDUCT
• RFS DOES NOT OVERRIDE
THE WAPDA CONDUCT
RULES 1978
• DEFINED MORE BROADLY IN
RFS
• DEFINITION OF FAMAILY
VERY BROAD AND THE
RULES R APPLICABLE ON
FAMILY MEMBERS ALSO
MISCONDUCT
• SOME MISCONDUCTS:
PERSISTANT LIVING BEYOND LEAKAGE OF
REPUTATION OF KNOWN SOURCES INFO
BEING CORRUPT OF INCOME RELATED TO
TENDR
DOCUMENTS

Appointed or Failure to initiate/


Speculative promoted on countersign or
transactions extraneous grounds forward ACR as per
against law given schedule
PROCEDURE(Summary)
Where formal enq. is to be Where formal enq. is not
conducted: to be conducted:

•Prelim enquiry •Prelim enquiry (No need


•Statement of allegations in case of abscondence)
•Appointment of Enq. offic. .Formal enq. not required
•Communication of where sufficient evidence
allegation exists or in case of plea
•Defense reply(7days) bargaining
•Statement of allegations
•Completion of formal
enq.(25 days) •Show cause notice
•Show cause notice •Defense reply (15 days)
•Defense reply (15 days) •Final orders.

PENALTIES
MINOR: MAJOR:
• CENSURE • REDUCTION TO A LOWER
POST OR TIME SCALE
• WITHHOLDING • COMPULSORY
PROMOTION OR RETIREMENT
INCREMENT FOR • REMOVAL FROM SERVICE
SPEC. PERIOD • DISSMISAL FROM
• RECOVERY SERVICE

REMOVAL FROM SERVICE DOES


NOT BUT DISSMISSAL FROM
SERVICE DOES DISQUALIFY FROM
FUTURE EMPLOYMENT.
REPRESENTATION
•A PERSON ON WHOME PENALTY
HAS BEEN IMPOSED MAY WITHIN
15 DAYS OF THE COMMUNICATION
OF THE ORDERS PREFER A
REPRESENTATION TO THE
COMPETENT AUTHORITY.
•COMPETENT AUTHORITY MAY SET
ASIDE CONFIRM MODIFY OR VARY
THE PENALTY.
APPEAL
•WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF
DECISION ON
REPRESENTATION.

•OR WAIT FOR 60 DAYS IF NO


DECISION ON
REPRESENTATION MADE.
THEN MAY GO TO COURT
WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE
COMPLETION OF 60 DAYS
PERIOD.
WA TER WI NG OFFI CERS
07. 05. 2001

 EXERCISING THE POWERS BY CEOs


AGAINST OFFICERS OF G-17 & 18
ATTACHED WITH OTHER FORMATION.
 APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION OF CEO
SHALL BE REFERRED TO GM (C&M) WATER
FOR DISPOSAL BY M (WATER) BEING
APPELLATE AUTHORITY.
TECH NICAL DI RECT OR
11. 02. 02

 UPGRADED TO CHIEF ENGINEER IN EACH


DISCOs WITH COMPLETE ADMINISTRATIVE
AND FINANCIAL POWERS OF CE.
 FIN / TECH DIR APPOINTED BY PEPCO ARE
EQUIVALENT IN STATUS TO GM OF WAPDA
(08.09.99)
CH IEF EN GINEERS
13. 04. 02

 POSTED IN DISCOs UPTO GRADE-17.


 APPELLATE AUTHORITY SHALL BE CEO OF
DISCO/NTDC.
 AGAINST THE DECISION OF CEO M
(POWER).
CEO s (EX CEPT G EN CO )
12. 10. 02
 OF GMs AND CEs
 UPTO GRADE 18 OFFICERS
 FOR G-18 OFFICER IN GENCO IS GM
(THERMAL)
 APPELLATE AUTHORITY IN ALL THE CASES
SHALL BE MEMBER CONCERNING THE
SERVICE GROUP.
DI R (H R& A)
06. 10. 03

IN RESPECT OF BPS 1 TO 16 EMPLOYEES


IRRESPECTIVE OF THE CADRE EXCEPT AUDIT
STAFF.
G.M (ADMN )
22. 07. 2004

DESIGNATED AS COMPETENT AUTHORITY


AGAINST THE CIVIL ENGINEERS OF WATER
WING – WORKING UNDER HIS DIRECT
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL UPTO BPS-19.

You might also like