Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Watch Philippines Position Paper On The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)
Social Watch Philippines Position Paper On The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)
Coady, D., & Parker, S. (2002). A cost-effectiveness analysis of demand and supply-side education interventions: The case of PROGRESA in Mexico. Discussion Paper No. 127. International Food Policy Research Institute.
Diokno. B. (2011). Will CCT help or hurt the poor? . Available from: University of the Philippines, School of Economics: http://econ.upd.edu.ph/faculty/bediokno/2010/10/12/will-cct-help-or-hurt-the-poor/ [Accessed: Dec 18, 2011].
Gundlach, E., Navarro de Pablo, J., & Weisert, N. (2001). Education is good for the poor. Discussion Paper No. 2001/137. World Institute for Development Economics Research.
Somera, N. (2010). Politics, Patriarchs, Palliative and the Poor: Conditional Cash Transfer in the Philippines, http://www.forumadb.org/docs/BP-201012.pdf [Accessed: Dec 17, 2011].
Social Watch Philippines Position Paper on the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)
http://focusweb.org/oldphilippines/content/view/470/52/ Ellao, J. A. (2010, October 23). Critics Slam Conditional Cash Transfer Program as Unsustainable, Corruption-Prone. Bulatlat.com. http://bulatlat.com/main/2010/10/23/critics-slam-conditional-cash-transfer-program-asunsustainable-corruption-prone/
http://business.inquirer.net/131537/industryholds-key-to-poverty-reduction
Rawlings, L. at Rubio, G. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 33.