Site Suitability Report C07AF: Offices, Dormay Street

Spring 2010
Site Suitability Report C07AF

Offices, Dormay Street
Please note: After phase one consultation this site suitability report was reviewed as part of a back-check. This report was reviewed by each discipline (engineering, planning, environment, community and property), but the report was not updated as the general overall site conclusions remained valid. Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
100-RG-PNC-C07AF-900001 | Spring 2010

Offices, Dormay Street
THAMES TUNNEL
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT C07AF

LIST OF CONTENTS
Page Number 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 Purpose and structure of the report Background Consultation 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 10
SITE INFORMATION 2.1 2.2 Site and surroundings Type of site
3 4
PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE 4.1 4.2 Introduction Restoration and after-use
ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Access Construction works considerations Permanent works considerations Health and safety
PLANNING ASSESSMENT 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Introduction Planning applications and permissions Planning context Consultation comments Planning comments
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 Introduction Transport Archaeology Built heritage and townscape Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Ecology Flood risk Air quality Noise Land quality
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 8.1 8.2 Socio-economic profile Issues and impacts
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT 9.1 9.2 Introduction Crown Land and Special Land comments
100-RG-PNC-C07AF-900001.doc
9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10
Land to be acquired Property valuation comments Disturbance compensation comments Offsite statutory compensation comments Site acquisition cost assessment
10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 13
SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Introduction Engineering Planning Environment Socio-economic and community Property
APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLE
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SuDS TfL TD TLRN TPA UDP UXO
above Ordnance Datum Biodiversity Action Plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
1 1.1 1.1.1
INTRODUCTION Purpose and structure of the report The Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper (paragraphs 2.3.29 - 2.3.34) outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of shaft sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report, but they depend on the relevance to the site and professional judgement made in the assessments. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: Engineering, Planning, Environment, Property and Community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 - Sources of Information, and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to the current stage. The Background Technical Paper provides information on the requirements for different site types, their sizes and typical activities/facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an engineering options report was produced. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). This is considered in the Preferred Scheme Report. Background The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A - Creation of the long list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites Part 1B - Creation of a short list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of shaft (and CSO) sites - an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of shaft (and CSO) sites - assessment against a list of detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
1.1.2
1.1.3 1.1.4
1.2 1.2.1
1.2.2
The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C - Creation of the Preferred List of shaft (and CSO) sites - site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that will result in the Preferred Scheme Report.
1.3 1.3.1
Consultation The Thames Water project team held meetings with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders to review the provisional short list of shaft and CSO sites. All general and site specific comments can be found in a separate report titled Consultation on the Short List of Sites: Consultation Feedback Report. These comments were considered to help determine the final short list of sites, but they were also considered at the optioneering workshops. Further meetings were held with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders between January and March 2010. Comments are included in this report.
1.3.2
Page 1
2 2.1 2.1.1
SITE INFORMATION Site and surroundings This site is one of the shortlisted sites for Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. The proposed site forms part of the Frogmore Complex, an industrial estate comprising various industrial units with associated loading/unloading areas and car parking. The site is presently used by a private business (Panorama Antennas), and is adjacent to the London Borough of Wandsworth maintenance depot. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2. The site is bounded by Dormay Street to the east and Frogmore to the west. The south of the site backs onto residential properties fronting onto Armoury Way and the north of the site is bounded by Bell Lane Creek. Existing access is taken from Dormay Street and Frogmore. The site is adjacent to the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. Neighbouring Wentworth House is a Grade II listed building and forms part of a cluster of buildings at the junction of Dormay Street and Armoury Way, including the Crane public house and the adjoining cottages and terrace. The wider area is mixed, comprising commercial, industrial and residential uses. The Frogmore Complex forms part of a wider industrial designation, which extends northwards towards the River Thames. There are secondary pockets of industrial activity on the south side of Armoury Way. The area immediately to the west of the site, fronting onto Frogmore, is residential and made up of apartments and terraced housing. Further residents are located to the south and east of Armoury Way. The nearest residents are located within London Court, Fullers House and Brewers House, approximately 20m away and directly opposite the proposed operational area. The site falls within other designated areas of the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan. These include Industrial Employment Areas 2008, an archaeological priority area, conservation area and Metropolitan Open Land. All the mapped designations are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. There is road access to the site via Dormay Street or Frogmore Street, which are a short distance to the A217. There is no rail network local to the site. East Putney London Underground station and Wandsworth Town rail station are less than 1.5km from the site. There are no existing wharfage/jetty facilities at the site it is about 120m inland of Bell Lane Creek. Moreover, there is no viable access to the creek, and barge movements into the creek are likely to be restricted. A transport plan for the site is attached as Appendix 5.
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8 2.1.9
2.1.10 Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: Frogmore local authority maintenance depot and surrounding warehouses Residential buildings to the south and west Frogmore Bell Lane Storm Relief Sewer CSO connection is to this sewer. 2.1.11 The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre-optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. 2.1.12 Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the shaft would be founded in London Clay.
Page 2
2.1.13 It is understood that National Grid is planning to build a cable tunnel which would run through the outside eastern part of the site. If this site is selected, there would be dialogue with National Grid to consider matters if applicable (such as timing, engineering constraints, cumulative effects of the projects, potential for site sharing, etc.) 2.2 2.2.1 Type of site The site C07AF is being considered as a CSO site to intercept the Frogmore Storm Relief Bell Lane Creek CSO (CS07A). PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction Phase Layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a CSO site potential access point. 3.1.3 These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO site construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration). 3.1.5 Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 0.5 to 2 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
3 3.1.1 3.1.2
3.1.4
4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2
PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE Introduction The indicative operational phase layout for the CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational Phase Layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites.
Page 3
4.1.3
The above ground infrastructure at this site is likely to comprise a ventilation column 10m high and 3m diameter, a ventilation building 5m x 15m x 5m high and a 20m x 10m top structure with openings. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the main shaft and flap valve chamber.
b
4.1.4
The top structures are envisaged to be finished at a level of 107m tunnel datum (TD) (7mAOD), and since the ground level mean value at this site is 104mTD (4mAOD), the top structures would be raised to approximately 3m above the current ground level. For further information on the generic layout of this top structure, refer to Appendix 8. A hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would not be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) frequency of visits 1 daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional 1 week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per 10 years that could be night/day/weekend working. 1 van visit every six months. An additional 1 week period of 2 to 10 movements per day (estimated several vans and 2 cranes) every 10 years.
4.1.5 4.1.6
No of traffic movements
4.2 4.2.1
Restoration and after-use The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required. ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT Access This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2. Road
5 5.1 5.1.1
5.1.2
The site can be reached via an existing road, Dormay Street, which is directly off the A217 (Armoury Way). This road leads to the local authority maintenance depot. It is expected that the road would be busy at certain hours of the day. For both the construction and operational phases, access would be from Dormay Street. For the construction phase, the opportunity exists to create a through traffic system for the site with entrance from Dormay Street and egress to Frogmore. For the operational phase, it would also be possible to access from Frogmore, should this be considered preferable.
5.1.3
It was anticipated that the ventilation column at shaft sites would be 10m high when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to 15m high, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of the site. b It was anticipated that the elevation of top structures at both CSO and shaft sites would be finished at 107mTD when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to 104.5mTD, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of t he site.
Page 4
Rail 5.1.4 There is no rail network local to this site. Rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites. River 5.1.5 River access and jetty/wharfage facilities are not a requirement for CSO sites. In addition, the site is some 120m from Bell Lane Creek, with no feasible access, and barge movements along the Creek are likely to be restricted. Construction works considerations The site is currently used as a small business premises. The drop shaft and construction working area would be located within the footprint of an existing two-storey, brick-built building, which has an area of approximately 90m x 45m. The combined sewer runs under this building before it reaches the outfall in Bell Lane Creek, which is approximately 120m from the site. The existing building would need to be demolished to make way for the shaft and interception chamber, and to provide a working area. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities show that the items in this area of concern are the neighbouring residential buildings and Frogmore Depot and surrounding warehouse. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme. The interception chamber and connection culvert to the drop shaft would both be within the site and therefore require no additional consideration. Permanent works considerations The top structures to the drop shaft and flap valve chamber would be 2m above ground level. Health and safety There are no unusual health and safety issues with this site. PLANNING ASSESSMENT Introduction The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments. 6.2 6.2.1 Planning applications and permissions An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database did not identify any planning applications submitted within the last five years applicable to the site.
5.2 5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3 5.2.4
5.3 5.3.1
5.4 5.4.1 6 6.1 6.1.1
Page 5
6.3 6.3.1
Planning context The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site and are taken from the current statutory development plan for the borough. The local plan comprises the saved policies from the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003, and the Consolidated London Plan, adopted February 2008. Policy GEN15, Industrial Employment Areas 2008 the site falls within an industrial area that is safeguarded for industrial uses. Under Policy GEN15, the council will seek to retain employment land and maximise its use by safeguarding long established industrial areas. The site is designated within the local plan as within a Significant Industrial Area. Under Policy TBE14, Archaeological Priority Area where development involves ground disturbance, the council will require developers to undertake an archaeological investigation. As appropriate the council may, under Policy TBE15, require the preservation of findings either in situ or by excavation. The site is adjacent to the Wandsworth Town Hall Conservation Area. Policy TBE10, Conservation Area, prohibits development which would harm the character, appearance and setting of a conservation area. The site sits adjacent to the Grade II listed Wentworth House. Policy TBE13, Listed Building, states that development which would harm the setting of listed buildings is unacceptable. Policy GEN12, Housing in determining proposals for development, the council will seek to protect and enhance the character and amenity of residential areas.
6.3.2
6.3.3 6.3.4
6.3.5 6.3.6 6.3.7 6.3.8 6.3.9
6.3.10 Policy ON7, Green Chain Links, prohibits development that would harm the open nature of any open land that contributes towards the Green Chain or link between open spaces, especially to Metropolitan Open Land and where they form strategic link between boroughs. 6.4 6.4.1 Consultation comments A series of consultations on the shortlisted sites were held with London local authorities, statutory and other pan-London stakeholders during July to September 2009 and January to March 2010. This section summarises factual comments that have been made by consultees, and which have informed the SSR assessments. London Borough of Wandsworth 6.4.2 The council stated that there are presently businesses located at the site, including a bathstore and stone masons yard. At the current time, Dormay Street is heavily used and is very restricted. The council advised that the site would cause traffic problems. English Heritage 6.4.3 English Heritage advised that the boundary of C07AB needs to be checked. Environment Agency 6.4.4 No comment. Port of London Authority 6.4.5 No comment. Transport for London 6.4.6 No comment.
Page 6
Other statutory consultees 6.4.7 6.5 6.5.1 No comment. Planning comments A number of planning designations are applicable to the site, and to the adjacent land and buildings. The relevant planning policies identified are described in Section 6.3 and, of these, those relating to heritage, residential amenity and employment uses are of most relevance to the proposed development. The site is within an established employment area. Use of the site would result in the loss of employment space. However, this is not considered to be detrimental to the viability of the area as a whole, and the site could be returned to employment use post completion of the Thames Tunnel construction works. The relocation to suitable alternative premises of the existing businesses affected by the proposed site may be required, to avoid them being extinguished. The proposal site lies adjacent to the northernmost extent of Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. The adjacent building, Wentworth House, is a Grade II listed building and the entrance to the Frogmore Complex is covered under the same listing. The development may give rise to some conflicts with Policies TBE10, TBE11 and TBE13, and mitigation would be required to avoid potential impacts from construction works and legacy structures on the appearance and setting of these designations. Further appraisal of the impact upon the listed building and conservation area is provided in Section 7. The proposal site is situated close to a residential area. The closest residents are located approximately 20m from the operation area. Given its proximity to dwellings, residents may experience some temporary disturbance and impact on general amenity from increased noise, dust and traffic movements. However, appropriate mitigation measures should ensure these impacts are not unacceptable. The site falls within a designated archaeology important area. The site is also identified as area of archaeological priority. Investigative and remedial requirements would need to be agreed with the LPA in accordance with policies TBE14 and TBE15 respectively. Further appraisal of the archaeological potential is provided in Sections 7. ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL Introduction The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental Appraisal Tables. Transport This site is suitable in transport terms, subject to alterations. A new access would need to be constructed seven or eight metres south of the existing access for Sinkstation. A temporary priority working system would need to be installed to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Potential road and rail access routes are suitable for HGVs should the priority working system be in place, as there are no other visible restrictions. However, due to the small amounts of excavated material that will be produced, it is unlikely that rail access would be utilised. River access is not required for this CSO site. There is a reasonable possibility that the workforce would be able to use public transport to access the site. Some parking could be provided onsite for the workforce. However, there would be no parking available nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street and the A3 is a red route. Traffic management would be required for the priority working system on Dormay Street.
6.5.2
6.5.3
6.5.4
6.5.5
7 7.1 7.1.1
7.2 7.2.1
7.2.2
Page 7
7.3 7.3.1
Archaeology Based on current information, this site is suitable. The site has no current records of archaeological remains. Owing to a lack of previous investigations in the area, the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted. Based on the information available, it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present within this site. Peat deposits containing archaeological material have been commonly recorded throughout London in a similar proximity to the River Thames. Given the location of the site, and wider evidence for historical occupation along the river, it is a reasonable assumption to suggest that waterlogged remains of archaeological value may be present. Built heritage and townscape The site is suitable because the scheme would have a limited impact upon the built heritage environment and the local townscape character. Impacts from the construction and operation of C07AF would be restricted to changes in the character of the site, local views, and indirect impacts upon the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area and one Grade II listed building (Wentworth House). Mitigation, including a high-quality scheme design and/or screening, would reduce any adverse impacts. Water resources hydrogeology and surface water In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as the drop shaft would be constructed in London Clay (non-aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head would be approximately 5.1 metres above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer would be expected and the superficial deposits are alluvium, which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There would be a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to the use of a diaphragm wall or caissons. In terms of surface water resources, this site is suitable as there is no direct route for pollution to Bell Lane Creek. Standard mitigation will be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement 23. Ecology This site is suitable as it would only require basic ecological surveys, if selected. Flood risk This site is suitable as it is defended to a one in 1,000-year flood level. There would be limited space onsite for SuDS; an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SuDS. Air quality This site is less suitable. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site. Fugitive emissions of dust would potentially have a perceptible impact on these properties, although these impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There would be potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas with existing poor air quality. This can be partially mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours. Noise This site is less suitable due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Frogmore Lane. Noise and vibration from demolition activities may cause an adverse impact to these properties. However, the number of vehicles likely to be associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to have low
7.3.2
7.4 7.4.1
7.5 7.5.1
7.5.2
7.6 7.6.1 7.7 7.7.1
7.8 7.8.1
7.9 7.9.1
Page 8
noise impact as there are very few residential properties located on Dormay Street and Armoury Way. 7.10 Land quality
7.10.1 The site is less suitable because of the high potential that contamination has occurred from historic activities onsite. These include a dye works and a second unspecified works which have the potential to impact on soils and shallow groundwater. Additionally, migration from offsite activities may have occurred through the shallow groundwater to beneath the site. 7.10.2 The contamination would have the potential to impact onsite workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. Additionally, the potential exists for contamination of surface water receptors to occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (ie, River Terrace Gravel) aquifer. 8 8.1 8.1.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Socio-economic profile The site is within the Fairfield ward of the London Borough of Wandsworth. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of Wandsworth, London and England as a whole: A higher rate of full-time employees and self-employed people. A higher rate of employment in professional occupations. A substantially higher proportion of people educated to Level 4/5 (degree level). Fewer people aged 19 or under, or 45 and over, (with comparably more people in their twenties and thirties). Approximately 82% people are white and around 75% of people were born in the UK. A higher proportion of residents reporting a good state of health. 8.1.2 Overall, this community profile suggests that the population mainly consists of young professionals. Issues and impacts Due to the engineering requirements for a CSO site in this location, the greatest potential impact, from a community impacts perspective, appears likely to be caused by the effect of the proposed works on the industrial units onsite. Any impact on these businesses may have financial implications for the business owners and employees. The London Court, Fullers House and Brewers House residences on Frogmore may face disruption from works on the site and the Crane public house may also be disrupted. Apart from this, the surrounding land uses are unlikely to be significantly impacted by the use of the site, as the area is mostly industrial. PROPERTY ASSESSMENT Introduction The site under consideration as a CSO site comprises an existing industrial property situated between Frogmore and Dormay Street, to the north of Wandsworth town centre and just off the Armoury Way one-way system.
8.2 8.2.1
8.2.2 8.2.3
9 9.1 9.1.1
Page 9
9.2 9.2.1
Crown Land and Special Land comments The land is privately owned and appears to be neither Crown Land nor Special Land. There should therefore be no procedural difficulty in acquiring the land using compulsory purchase powers. Land to be acquired The site comprises an industrial and office property. A temporary acquisition of the site would not be practical as a temporary relocation of the business, followed by relocation back to the site after the works are finished, would significantly increase acquisition costs and business disturbance. The compensation assessment therefore assumes that the worksite would be acquired permanently. The existing building would be demolished. The operational phase would require a much smaller area, with dimensions of approximately 12m by 20m. Therefore, the non-operational part of the site may be become surplus and may be sold after the works are complete. The permanent operational area is currently shown on engineering drawings as to be located in the centre of the site, which partially sterilises the site for post works resale. If the operational area could be located in a corner of the site, the resale value would be improved. Property valuation comments The freehold is owned by Andrew Jesman, Christopher Jesman and Torr Pension Trustees Ltd and part of the site is owned by Panorama Antennas Limited. Panorama Antennas currently occupies the premises. The property is listed in the 2005 Rating List as Factory and Premises, with a rateable value of 135,000. The ownership includes the industrial building which abuts this property on its southern side. This property appears to be in separate occupation and the fact that it is in the same ownership should not have any significant impact on acquisition costs. The planning history shows no recent planning application in relation to this site. The site is located within an industrial employment area. Therefore it appears that any redevelopment would be for employment purposes. As the current building is reasonably modern, it seems unlikely that the site would be redeveloped in the foreseeable future. Acquisition costs have been assessed on a market value basis. The acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable. Disturbance compensation comments The site is used as industrial and office premises and is occupied by Panorama Antennas. The occupier may therefore claim the cost of relocation. Panorama Antennas appears to have been in occupation of this property since 1992, according to its website. Panorama is a manufacturer of antennas for the telecommunications and electronics industries. The building is therefore likely to contain manufacturing plant: manufacturing businesses are usually among the most expensive and difficult to relocate. The manufacturing process used by Panorama appears to be based mainly on plastic injection moulding. Injection moulding based manufacturing tends to be easier to relocate than other manufacturing uses, however a significant level of disruption is still likely to be caused to this business. A preliminary assessment using figures from Dun and Bradstreet indicates that the disturbance compensation costs are likely to be acceptable. This assumes that the existing production plant can be relocated. If this is not the case, the acquisition costs could increase significantly.
9.3 9.3.1 9.3.2
9.3.3
9.3.4
9.4 9.4.1
9.4.2
9.4.3
9.4.4 9.4.5 9.5 9.5.1 9.5.2 9.5.3
9.5.4
Page 10
9.5.5
There is insufficient information available at this stage to make an accurate judgement regarding whether existing production plant can be moved without disrupting the business and what the cost implications are if this is not the case. Based on current available information, the disturbance costs are likely to be acceptable, assuming an orderly relocation. If significant disruption was caused to the business and some difficulty was experienced with relocating some production plant, the disturbance costs would increase significantly, but at this stage it appears that the costs are still likely to be at acceptable levels. Offsite statutory compensation comments There should be limited potential for offsite statutory compensation under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965, as there is unlikely to be any physical interference with public or private property rights. There should also be limited potential for claims under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, as the completed works are unlikely to result in diminution in value to property. Site acquisition cost assessment The statutory acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable. SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE Introduction
9.5.6 9.5.7
9.6 9.6.1
9.6.2
9.7 9.7.1 10 10.1
10.1.1 The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment , and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not. 10.2 Engineering
10.2.1 This site is suitable as a CSO site because it would be of adequate area and would have good vehicular access. The shaft could be constructed close to the sewer to be intercepted. Use of the site would require demolition of the existing two-storey building. 10.3 Planning
10.3.1 On balance, the site is considered suitable for use as a CSO site. 10.3.2 The proposal site is unlikely to have an unacceptable impact upon residential amenity and appropriate mitigation should reduce potential impacts on the identified heritage designations. The site is within an established employment area and the loss of an existing employment use would require policy justification. There may be a requirement to relocate existing businesses and this would require further investigation. 10.4 Environment
10.4.1 Overall, the site is considered to be suitable for use as a CSO site. However, mitigation would be required to enable the site to be used. 10.4.2 Based on current information, the site is suitable from the perspective of transport, archaeology, water resources (hydrogeology and surface water), ecology, flood risk, built heritage and townscape. 10.4.3 The site is considered less suitable from the perspective of air quality, noise and land quality.
Page 11
10.4.4 Overall, the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether air quality, noise and land quality impacts can be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include: Air Quality - dust control measures, and minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours. Noise - Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228, siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors, and provision of site boundary noise fences. Land Quality - further studies in order to determine the level of contamination present. 10.5 Socio-economic and community
10.5.1 From a community impacts perspective, this site appears suitable for use as a CSO site. Use of the site may impact on the operation of Panorama Antennas, the business currently using the site. This may have financial implications on the business owners and employees concerned. 10.5.2 The three-storey residential dwellings on Frogmore to the west of the site may experience a level of disruption. Mitigation may involve limiting site hours and using noise reduction measures. 10.5.3 The site is adjacent to industrial buildings; these appear unlikely to be greatly affected by the use of the site. 10.6 Property
10.6.1 This site is considered suitable as a CSO site. 10.6.2 The advantage of the site is as follows: Acquisition costs should be significant but acceptable. 10.6.3 The disadvantages of the site are as follows: The site is developed and acquisition would result in significant business disturbance There is potential for acquisition costs to increase significantly if existing production plant cannot be relocated without significant disruption to the business.
Page 12
Site Suitability Report C07AF - Appendices
APPENDICES
Page 13
Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 1
APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Engineering Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail Scott Wilson Access River BMT Third Parties (Shafts/CSOs) Mott MacDonald and AECOM Geology Thames Water Utilities Thames Water and AECOM Construction and Operational Layout Template London Tideway Tunnels Background Technical Paper London Tideway Tunnels Planning London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database Saved policies in the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted in August 2003, and the Consolidated London Plan, adopted in February 2008
Environment Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) - www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east - www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans - www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores - Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map - www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring - www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes - www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides, 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency Built heritage and townscape Wandsworth List of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record - for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plans Local authority websites Bing maps Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors
Appendix 1 - Page 1
Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan - www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb - http://wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/pages/londonmap.html National Biodiversity Network - http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps - aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats - www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales - www.ukbap.org.uk Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Air quality Local authority websites www.londonair.org.uk/london/asp/default.asp?la_id=&showbulletins=&width=1680 http://www.airquality.co.uk Noise Envirocheck - Identification of receptors Promap - Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap - Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps - Identification of existing noise levels Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information
Socio-economic and community Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data The Crane Pub - http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/s/24/24129/ Crane/Wandsworth, and http://www.fancyapint.com/pubs/pub1788.html http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/CommunityServices/Businesssupport/ default.htm
Appendix 1 - Page 2
Property Mouchel referencing data Rating records from VOA Web site Promap Multimap/Live Maps Dun & Bradstreet Focus
Appendix 1 - Page 3
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN
Appendix 2 - Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
Area of Main Map
&
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites
AF T
! (
CSO (Directly Controlled)
CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO
! (
C07AF
0 50 100
200 Metres 300 400
WANDSWORTH
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way.
Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00973 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid
Thames Water Utilities

MAJOR PROJECTS
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
APPENDIX 2 C07AF SITE SITE LOCATION PLAN
APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS
Appendix 3 - Page 1
Bell Lane Cree
Mean High Wate
Bor
Factory
Works 5.8m
House
U SM GG LE
TI AL
Works
3
M
4
M
9
11
RS
Goods Shed
M
Cable Bridge
W AY
CCLW
EN
Cable Bridge
CCLW
Legend
Thames Policy Area Town Centre Other Frontages
FI D
5.7m
M
CR
Mud
Viaduct
Co ns Boro
AF T
26
NO
H RT

Works
29
27
Warehouse
Mud
Industrial Employment Areas 2008 Site Allocations Document Sites
Adelaide Centre
Works
Warehouse
! (
MH
Mud
Bell L
Mud
Mean High Water
ane C
25
Depot
reek
Mud
M
MLW MLW
Bridges
Pipe
22
r Mean Hig h Wate
Sluice
4.9m
15
Chy
Hilden House
46
Depot
WB
T HE
El Sub Sta
WANDSWORTH
51
CAU
El Sub Sta
SE W
AY
PH
The Roche School

1
OG FR
E OR
7
1 to
8 to
13
61
Works
C07AF
Works
Works
WANDSWORTH
10
Rive r Wa
Child Guida nce Unit
1 to 8
21
1 to 8
22
7.8m
Posts
Garage
CAR
1a
ALL
SAINT S
PASSA GE
102
Works
5
100
Bank
104
All Saints' Church
M
1
M
Yard Arm s King's
M
5.0m
98
BUSH
AG ES CO TT
110
108
106
5.2m
M PH
96
RAM STREE
1 to
16
Lodge
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
1 to
16
43
1 to
51
24
25
BR
31
16
to
IDG
z Br a
th Lam be Cou rt
il H
1 to
7.1m
1 to
24
K AR EP
to 30
s ou
30
ltin Bo
o gH
u se
Wo rks
37 to
42
m il dle Mid ous e H
l
8 1 to 28
26
ndle
24
LB
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
5.0m
12
Vin e
8
1 to
6 to
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
ea
8 5 to 16 to
Ct
13
10
11
20
21
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park El Sub Sta

to 2 5
1 to
Works
63
Works
Works
idg Pi pe Br
n Wi
o ds
rC
ou
rt
20
14 to 1 9
s We
1 to 6
tm
ins
te r
Ct
Brewers House
s Ho u
M
22
20
16
PH
6.3m
ARM
WAY Y OUR
ers F u ll e ous e H
4.1m
Stables
Horse Exercise Area
M M
M M
M M
Studios
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M
Brewery
M
Churc
Garage
PA
SS
AG
&
Industrial Area M
Mixed Use Areas
M 5.0m M
M M
ar t& W
d Bd y
Legend
Gas Holder
! (
Gas Holder
Garage
2
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. This plan is a strategic and standardised overview based on an interpretation of GIS policy designation layers provided by affected London local authorities. Please refer to the text in the SSR's for the full planning and environment assessments. 34
38
36
4.8m
Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-01105 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid 13

14
15
4.8m
Salvation Army The Citadel
SE C LO Paddington, AM RE H SH O
Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, London W2 1AF
Title:
APPENDIX 3A C07AF SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
El Sub Sta
SB
Mean Hig h Water
MP 5
Mud 4.6m
Town Centres River Walks
Delta Park
Area of Main Map
Bell Lane Creek
Riv a nd er W le
E TH CA EW US
Bell Lane
AY
28
D SU LO W
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled)
30
ee Cr
A RO
31
34
18
4d
4a
2
40
D SU LO W A RO D
10
20
40
60
80
R DO
ST RE ET MAY
Metres
64
62
60a c 60 60b 60d
PUTNEY BRIDGE ROAD
15

MAJOR PROJECTS
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
30
24
to 20 22
13
rk Wo s
Go v t O ff ice
7 to 9
w h Ro
14
6
TE R R 'S YA D
Bell Lane Cree
Mean High Wate
Bor
Works 5.8m
House
U SM GG LE
TI AL
11
RS
Goods Shed
W AY
! !
Cable Bridge
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
Viaduct
! ! ! !
CCLW
CCLW
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
PH
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Mud
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
MLW
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Riv
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Pipe
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
5
Works
3
! !
EN
! ! ! Cable Bridge ! ! ! !
MP 5
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
5.7m
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
CR
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
Mud
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
FI D
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Mean Hig h Water
Mud
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Delta Park
Co ns Boro
ar t& W
d Bd y
! ! !
8
AF T
26
NO
H RT
27
PA
SS
GE

Works Warehouse
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Legend
Gas Holder
&
Mud !
Adelaide Centre
Works
Warehouse
! (
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
MH
! Mud ! !W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
22
! ! ! !
Bell ! !Lan ! e !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Mud
! Mean ! High ! Water ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Wo rks
Bridges
25
Depot
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Creek
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! (
Gas Holder
r Mean Hig h Wate
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
MLW
Sluice !
15
4.9m! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
Chy
! ! ! !
AY
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
Hilden House
46
! Depot ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
WB
T HE
El Sub Sta
WANDSWORTH
51
CAU
El Sub Sta
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
SE W
PH
The Roche School

1
OG FR
E OR
7
! !
1 to 6
8 to 13
61
! Works ! ! ! ! !
El Sub Sta
to 2 5
1 to
! ! ! ! C07AF ! ! ! ! ! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
16
!Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
WANDSWORTH
Garage
2
10
Rive r Wa
Legend
7.8m
1 to 8
21
!
Works
! ! !
5 3
! ! !
! !
Open Spaces !
!
14
Open Spaces Deficiency Areas

Garage
Posts
!
Go v
1a
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
5.0m
ALL
SAINT S
! ! ! PASSA GE ! ! !
102
100
Bank
104
! ! ! All Saints' Church ! ! ! ! ! !
98
Yard Arm s King's
BUSH
AG ES CO TT
110
108
106
PH
RAM STREE
Green Corridor/Chains
1 to 8
22
1 to
16
Lodge
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
1 to
16
43
1 to
51
24
25
BR
31
16
to
IDG
z Br a
th Lam be Cou rt
il H
1 to
1 to
24
37 to
42
K AR EP
to 30
s ou
l
8 1 to 28
26
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
7 to 9
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
ndle
24
! LB
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
30
ltin Bo
o gH
u se
5.0m
12
Vin e
8
1 to
6 to
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
ea
8 5 to 16 to
Ct
13
10
11
20
21
! ! !
! ! !
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! Works ! !
63
! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
20
! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
idg Pi pe Br
!e ! ! ! ! ! ! !
n Wi
o ds
u Co
rt
20
14 to 1 9
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
22 !
! ! ! ! ! !
!A ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! WAY URY RMO ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
s We
1 to 6
tm
ins
Ct te r
Brewers House
s Ho u
! ! ! !
! 6.3m ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
5.0m
! !
! ! 4.1m
Horse Exercise Area
Stables
38
36
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
4.8m

14
15
!Studios ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
4.8m
! !
! !
!Garage ! !
Brewery
Title:
APPENDIX 3B C07AF SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
El Sub Sta
SB
4.6m
Area of Main Map
Bell Lane Creek
a nd er W
le
E TH
CA
EW US
Bell Lane
AY
28
29
D SU LO W
30
ee Cr
A RO
31
34
18
4d
4a
2
40
D SU LO W A RO D
10
20
40
60
80
R DO
Metres
ST RE ET MAY
64
62
60a c 60 60b 60d
PUTNEY BRIDGE ROAD
15

MAJOR PROJECTS
30
24
to 20 22
13
rk Wo s
t O ff ice
CAR TE R R 'S YA D
Churc
w h Ro
Bell Lane Cree
Mean High Wate
Bor
Factory
Works 5.8m
House
U SM GG LE
TI AL
11
RS
Goods Shed
CCLW
W AY
Works
3
4.8m Cable Bridge
EN
Cable Bridge
CCLW
Mud
5.7m
FI D
Viaduct
MP 5
CR
Delta Park
Co ns Boro
&
AF T
26
NO
RT

Works
29
27
Warehouse
Mud
Adelaide Centre
Works
Warehouse
! (
MH
Mud
22
Bell L
Mud
Mean High Water
Bridges
Pipe
ane C
25
Depot
reek
Mud
r Mean Hig h Wate
MLW
MLW
Sluice
4.9m
15
Chy
Hilden House
46
Depot
WB
T HE
El Sub Sta
WANDSWORTH
51
CAU
El Sub Sta
SE W
AY
PH
The Roche School

1
OG FR
E OR
7
1 to
8 to
13
61
Works
C07AF
Works
Works
WANDSWORTH
!
Works
idg Pi pe Br e
10
Rive r Wa
1 to 8
1 to 8
22
7.8m
! Listed Buildings
Listed Buildings
Garage
21
Posts
Works
5
Conservation Areas
14
3
1a
ALL
SAINT S
PASSA GE
102
100
Bank
104
All Saints' Church
!
King's Yard Arm s
98
BUSH
AG ES CO TT
110
106 108
5.0m 5.2m PH
96
RAM STREE
Archaeological Areas
1 to
16
Lodge
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
51
Legend
to 20 22
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
1 to
16
43
1 to
24
25
BR
31
16
to
IDG
z Br a
th Lam be Cou rt
il H
1 to
7.1m
1 to
24
K AR EP
to 30
s ou
30
ltin Bo
o gH
u se
Wo rks
37 to
42
l
8 1 to 28
26
ndle
24
LB
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
5.0m
12
Vin e
8
1 to
6 to
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
ea
8 5 to 16 to
Ct
13
10
11
20
21
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park El Sub Sta

to 2 5
1 to
Works
63
Works
n Wi
o ds
rC
ou
rt
20
14 to 1 9
ARM
22
20
WAY Y OUR
5.0m
s We
1 to 6
tm
ins
Ct te r
Brewers House
s Ho u
16
PH
6.3m
4.1m
Horse Exercise Area
Stables
Studios
13
!
Garage
Brewery
HP
AS
SA
GE
ar t& W
d Bd y
Legend
Gas Holder
! (
Gas Holder
Garage
2
38
36
4.8m

14
15
4.8m
Title:
El Sub Sta
SB
Mean Hig h Water
Mud 4.6m
Area of Main Map
Bell Lane Creek
Riv a nd er W le
E TH CA EW US
Bell Lane
AY
28 30
D SU LO W
ee Cr
A RO
31
34
18
4d
4a
2
40
D SU LO W A RO D
10
20
40
60
80
R DO
ST RE ET MAY
Metres
64
62
60a c 60 60b 60d
PUTNEY BRIDGE ROAD
15

MAJOR PROJECTS
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
30
24
APPENDIX 3C C07AF SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT HERITAGE PLAN
rk Wo s
Go v t O ff ice
CAR TE R R 'S YA D
7 to 9
Churc w h Ro
APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS
Appendix 4 - Page 1
EN
TI AL FI D
Area of Main Map
AF T
Legend
&
! (
C07AF
! (
0 50 100
200
300
400
Metres
WANDSWORTH
Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00994 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 4 C07AF SITE AERIAL PLAN
View of the site looking towards the southeast along Frogmore. Photograph shows the existing Panorama Antennas building.
View of the rear of the existing Panorama Antennas building looking west from Dormay Street.
Appendix 4
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN
Appendix 5 - Page 1
EN
TI AL FI D
&
Legend
Area of Main Map
AF T
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled) Transport Access Routes TfL Road Network Thames Path
! (
London Cycle Routes

C07AF
Narrow road
! (
40
80
160
Meters
240
320
400
WANDSWORTH
! (
CS07B Frogmore Storm Relief - Buckhold Road CSO
Map Ref : ........... 101PL-SS-00703 Date : ................. 2009/11/19 Projection : ......... British National Grid

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 5 C07AF SITE TRANSPORT PLAN
APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN
Appendix 6 - Page 1
1
Chapelier
2
House
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
1202 1252 WO
Milliners House
N
AWAITING OS DATA
GEOLOGY
8250 8201 150mm Ground level 105 (m OD + 100) 3092
Keyplan:
3133 1251 1201 ZBV030273 N.B.THIS MAIN TO BE ABANDONED
WORK IN PROGRESS
N
4.4m
POSITION AND LAYOUT OF MAINS AND ASSETS NOT CONFIRMED
DRAWING LOCATION
Mud
4201
Riverside House
Mud
7250
98(m OD + 100) Base of Made Ground and Superficial
PROPOSED #9599 W/R# 42QRPT
PH
3103
3104
WB
7101 7150
40 YARDS 6" MAIN LAID 31-7-69

6.7m
5703 NF 3102
Bol
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE

WB
SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 3096 Suggested invert level of shaft DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
WO 2101 5832 WO
1 to 26 Mud
WO 6103 4" WO EV 6102 6104

4.4m
71.89(m OD + 100)
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT 8150 DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
6101
2102 3134 1101

Weir
2905 8152
SWANDON WAY WANDSWORTH SPS NOTES: SWANP4ZZ 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES.
3274
El Sub Sta Works Switch Factory Works 6.4m El Sub Sta 5.2m El Sub Sta
3097
Base of London Clay Formation 54(m OD + 100) 8101 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
WO NF
5.8m
House
3101
Goods Shed
15"STEEL TUBE RENEWED <---24-9-36
450mm VALVE WO AND 100mm BY-PASS
7153
7007 0.75" AP 7005 7004

4.8m
3093
RELAID DEC 1938 APPROX 90 YARDS 1002 1001 1003 1004
Works
7006
FH
3001
Cable Bridge
Cable Bridge
7003
Base of Lambeth Group 33(m OD + 100)

S Br
Mud 5.7m
2001 WO
NF 3135
5.0m 1005
7050 Base of Thanet Sand Formation

Delta Park
S Br Mud
LEGEND
FOUL WATER
6943
22(m OD + 100)
5705
4.9m SB
3098 3117
4.6m
8001
SURFACE WATER
OSV 3118 WO 3136 3005 3004
3003
3002 FH
4001 7002 WO 7001 6944 Chalk
CLEAN WATER
GAS
FIBRE OPTICS
Works
Works Gas Holder
TELECOMMUNICATIONS 3089
Mud
1907
Works
3903
Warehouse
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
1906 SE
2902
6.0m
Mean High Water Mud
Bridges
8902 HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
Works
Adelaide
WO
FV
Depot 3904
0402 EXISTING TUNNELS
Centre
4905
Mud
3/4" AP
MLW
MLW
Sluice
PH
3139
7.3m
SITE BOUNDARY 3902
4.9m
2901
LB
FV
Chy
Gas Holder SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING PURPOSES
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER - ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
Hilden House
C07AB
Depot
WB
3122 5901
El Sub Sta
7901 3102 DBV006076
STORM & FOUL SEWERS
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS: TELECOMS - ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES - LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE 200mm 10 m 0 100 m SCALE 1 : 1000
El Sub Sta
Pembridge Place
2909 SE
7.0m
El Sub Sta
DBV006075 4901ZBV030269 3" 3905

The Roche School
7
Works
WO
Garage
WANDSWORTH
8914 VMH
5.6m
ELECTRICITY
GAS 3137 3901

London Court
PH
3119
Car Park
4806
C07AF
Works Works
Works
Works
PROPOSED WIMBLEDON TO KENSAL GREEN CABLE TUNNEL
DBV006074 WM 4505
0407 WO 6801
3094 8803
3803
El Sub Sta
Works
ZBV030270 2805 WO 2804 2851 2806 2852 2801 5803

Brewers House PH 6.3m
7804
5.0m
VC
3140
WO
4803 4802 ZBV030268
3131
WO ZBV030267 WO
Horse Exercise Area
VC 7807 SE
PH
LB
1801 1850 2850 3120 3802 3801

7.1m 5.0m
4.8m
AC 2803 3121 4804 4801 WO 7802

6.4m 5.2m
8802
6802 SE
7805 VMH
BD 7801 NF 8801 NF WO VC AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
18-12-09 31-07-09
Date
3106 ZBV030272 WO 6088 2703 2751 3702

6.2m PH
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
WO ZBV030266
8805
100
OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
3111 26 YDS 4" MAIN LAID 22-10-64 Studios 5703 5702 WO 4489
4.8m
1701 6009 1750 WO

Posts Lodge
3130
GUAR NO 6438 7702

Salvation Army Citadel
8703
VC 7703 WO
El
Location Code:
D
0337
Milton Court
VT
3703 ZBV030271
Garage
El Sub Sta
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
Brewery
Sub Sta
Project Group:
LTTDT
WASTE LONDON N/A 50

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
2750 2702 6089 WO Garage 4704

All Saints Church
Works Bank
Posts
6704
3701
Municipal Buildings
Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
THAMES TUNNEL
3104 DRAIN PIT NOW IN ROAD 5701 7701 IL-2.17m
Drawing Title: Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN C07AF

Drawing No.:
4701 WO
SU 4703 4702 SE 3129 SE

EV DC
5.2m
WW
5.0m PH
6702
7606 7605 Town Hall 7604
Fn
4613 VT
PLOTTED ON 16\12\09 BY Andy.Purdy LOCATION : Thames Tideway Tunnel
PH x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\cs07a\100-DL-PNC-C07AF-146001.dgn
VT DC
WO
DETAILS OF DIVERSIONS
PS
IL-2.13m
6614
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
LVHTCABGWF
SWFGTLV
100-DL-PNC-C07AF-146001
1:1000
A1
AB
150
FH
2812 SE
2811 VMH
Vauxhall Court
VC WO
4.1m
Stables
SW
WFGT
APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 7 - Page 1
APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 8 - Page 1
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 - - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS

Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE LONDON N/A 50

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
PLOTTED ON
04\12\09
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
Thames Tideway Tunnel
x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
NTS
A1
AB
100
150
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLES
Transport Site considerations Access to road network Comments Site accesses onto Dormay Street approximately seven/ eight metres south of northern extent of existing access for Sinksation Kitchens & Bathrooms. Site access will need construction. Care needs to be taken to ensure exact location of access provides sufficient room on Dormay Street to allow HGVs to manoeuvre in and out of the site. Dormay Street is subject to a 30mph speed limit, is street lit and features double yellow lines along its extent on both sides. It has a carriageway width of 8m which reduces to 4.2m in width through a narrow road section. Visibility splays from the proposed access on Dormay Street are 30m to the south and approximately 30m to the north (to the end of the road). Access to the A217 (TLRN strategic highway network) approximately 70m to the south using Dormay Street. A priority working system would be required to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Alternatively it may be possible to provide either access or egress from the site via Frogmore to relieve pressure on the narrow section. See Transport Access Plan in Appendix 5. Access to river River access not required for CSO site. River access not required as excavated material will be transported away by road. Route to possible rail link at Clapham Junction runs through a high street area along St Johns Hill and under two rail bridges with no visible restrictions in addition to the constraints Mitigation required and conclusions Conclusion: Road access to site likely to be suitable for HGVs, with the installation of a priority working system to allow construction vehicles to safely pass along the narrow section on Dormay Street for TLRN (A217) access. Alternatively it may be possible to allow access or egress from the site onto Frogmore to relieve pressure on narrow section of Dormay Street. On street parking along Dormay Street prevented by double yellow lines along both sides. Site access will need construction.
Access to rail
Access to rail unlikely to be required due to small volumes of excavated material produced by the site. Access to railway sidings at Clapham Junction from the
Appendix 9 - Page 1
Transport Site considerations Comments TLRN (A217) onto the gyratory between the A217 and A3205 turning onto the A214. The route then leads onto East Hill following onto St Johns Hill before turning onto Plough Road for the Clapham Junction, Traincare Depot railway sidings. The route contains the same constraints as the route to the TLRN (A217), in addition to passing under two rail bridges (on Swandon Way and Trinity Road) with no visible restrictions and through a high street area along St Johns Hill. Distance 2.5km to rail access point from site. Parking Some parking could be provided within the site boundary for workforce. No parking is available within the vicinity of the site as Dormay Street has continuous double yellow lines along both sides. PTAL 3-4 (Medium) as identified within Table 2.3. Some parking for workforce to be provided within site boundary with no parking available in vicinity of site. Mitigation required and conclusions encountered upon accessing the TLRN (A217). Clapham Junction railway sidings at the Traincare Depot accessible using Plough Road.
Public transport accessibility
Reasonable possibility of workforce being able to use public transport to access the site. Temporary traffic management required in the form of a priority working system to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street (if Frogmore not used). Access will need construction.
Traffic Management
Introduction of a priority working system required to allow construction vehicles to pass each other through the narrow road section (4.2m wide) on Dormay Street (if Frogmore not used). Access will need construction.
Summary: This site is suitable in transport terms, a new access would need to be constructed seven or eight metres south of the existing access for Sinkstation. A temporary priority working system would need to be installed to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Potential road and rail access routes are suitable for HGVs should the priority working system be in place, as there are no other visible restrictions. However, due to the small amounts of excavated material that will be produced it is unlikely that rail access would be utilised. River access is not required for this CSO site. There is a reasonable possibility that the workforce would be able to use public transport to access the site. Some parking could be provided onsite for the workforce, however there would be no parking available nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street and as A3 is red route. Temporary traffic management would be required for the priority working system on Dormay Street.
Appendix 9 - Page 2
Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including Archaeological Priority Areas Comments The site is within the Wandsworth Archaeological Priority Area Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. Mitigation methods could include: Desk based assessment Production of deposits model Archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations Archaeological evaluation
Summary of historical uses
The 1868 OS historic mapping shows development of the site for industrial works. The development remains th throughout the 20 century. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being within the site. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of medium value being within the site None recorded
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected
Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
Extent of existing disturbance (if known)
The construction of the existing combined sewer pipeline is likely to have adversely impacted archaeological receptors for a localised area. Geotechnical data is currently insufficient to assess below ground conditions. Detailed design proposals, and an outline method statement will be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals. With the currently available information it is not possible to highlight specific potential issues.
Potential issues
Appendix 9 - Page 3
Archaeology Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Archaeological watching brief Archaeological excavation Summary: Based on current information this site is suitable. The site has no current records of archaeological remains; owing to a lack of previous investigations in the area the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted. Based on the information available it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present within this site. Peat deposits containing archaeological material have been commonly recorded throughout London in a similar proximity to the River Thames. Given the location of the site, and wider evidence for historical occupation along the river, it is a reasonable assumption to suggest waterlogged remains of archaeological value may be present.
Appendix 9 - Page 4
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including Conservation Areas, including trees Comments Listed Buildings Wentworth House with forecourt wall, gate and gatepiers, Grade II: 20m 1-6 Church Row, Grade II*: 165m 7, 8 and 9 Church Row, Grade II: 135m Church of All Saints, Wandsworth High Street, Grade II*: 165m 22-24 Putney Bridge Road, Grade II: 210m 140-142 Wandsworth High Street, Grade II: 210m Locally Listed Buildings There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of C07AF. Conservation Areas Wandsworth Town Conservation Area: 0m Registered Historic Parks & Garden There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of C07AF. Locally Listed Parks and Gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens with 250m of C07AF. Protected Views There are no protected views within 250m of C07AF. Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected The Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area has the potential to be directly affected as C07AF partially lies within the boundaries of the conservation area and the development will involve the demolition of some existing (but non-designated) buildings. Mitigation in the form of a high quality and sensitive scheme design and/or screening would be required to ensure that the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Putney Embankment Conservation Area. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of listed buildings and conservation areas, a high quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment in conjunction with archaeology work will be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals. On the basis of currently available information (June 2009) and on the basis of certain receptors not being present within 250m of C07AF, mitigation will not be applicable in the case of locally listed buildings, registered historic parks and gardens, locally listed parks and gardens and protected views.
Appendix 9 - Page 5
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Comments Not Applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not Applicable
There is the potential for 6 listed buildings (two Grade II* and two Grade II listed buildings) to be indirectly affected through changes to their setting.
Of the 6 listed buildings within 250m of C07AF, five do not share a visual relationship with the site reflecting the built up character of the area. Consequently it is unlikely that development at the site will result in an impact upon the setting of these listed buildings and mitigation is therefore unlikely to be required. However, Wentworth House (Grade II listed) is visible from C07AF and the development may therefore affect the setting of this listed building. Mitigation in the form of a high quality scheme design and/or screening may be required to reduce the visual intrusiveness of the site upon Wentworth House.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Site in Locally Significant Industrial Area. Site on the maintenance depot building. Rest of the maintenance depot to the north with Bell Lane Creek further north, Dormay Street to the east with industrial units, Frogmore to the west with residential properties, and Armour Way to the south with industrial and residential properties. Demolition of maintenance depot would increase the openness of the site. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary, direct impacts on the
Introduction of a landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting would enhance the character of the site. Demolition of building would alter the character of the site. This site is suitable with appropriate mitigation that aims to enhance the character of the site with planting and suitable materials.
Appendix 9 - Page 6
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments character of the site and temporary, adverse indirect impacts on neighbouring areas. Permanent elements would have a minimal adverse impact on the character of the site. Potential views likely to be affected Partially interrupted views from the surrounding streets and residential properties. During construction, views of cranes from surrounding residential properties along Frogmore and Armour Way. Permanent elements marginally visible from surrounding properties. During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would minimize visual impact. Design of top structure, vent column, and electrical kiosk to be given careful consideration. Planting to screen permanent plant. Demolition of the maintenance depot would be visually significant, therefore, adequate new planting would be important to protect visual amenity. This site is suitable with appropriate mitigation. Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required The direct impact of permanent structures upon the character or appearance Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and the setting of one Grade II listed building would need to be carefully considered. Any permanent structures will need to be of a high quality design in order that their visual intrusiveness is minimised and, in particular, so that they preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area in accordance with planning policy and English Heritage guidance. Screening of permanent structures may also be required to reduce any visual intrusiveness of the site. Mitigation through scheme design and/or screening would reduce the visual impact of the development upon the setting of the Grade II listed Wentworth House. Potential issues Although there are numerous built heritage receptors within 250m of C07AF only the Appendix 9 - Page 7
Mitigation required and conclusions
The scheme design will need to be of a sufficiently high quality and may need
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and one listed building together with the character of the site and local views, have the potential to experience any form of impact. There is the potential to mitigate against any adverse impacts through a high quality scheme design and/or screening. Mitigation required and conclusions to include some screening in order that it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and reduces the visual impact of the site upon the setting of the Grade II listed Wentworth House.
Summary: The site is suitable because the scheme would have a limited impact upon the built heritage environment and the local townscape character. Impacts from the construction and operation of C07AF would be restricted to changes in the character of the site, local views, indirect impacts upon the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and one Grade II listed building (Wentworth House). Mitigation including a high quality scheme design and/or screening would reduce any adverse impacts
Appendix 9 - Page 8
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site Considerations hydro-geological conditions (Groundwater and Surface Water) From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial Geology and Made Ground (7m) London Clay (44m) Lambeth Group (21m) Thanet sand (11m) Hydrogeology Piezometric Level in Chalk Aquifer: ~ -23 mAOD (~28 mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater Monitoring Location EA Hydrometry Sites: TQ27-159 - approximately 262 m southeast of the site (water levels to March 2009) Watercourses Bell Lane Creek approximately 65 m away River Thames approx. 400m away to south SPZs and groundwater users SPZ Not located in a Source Protection Zone EA Licensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details No public water supply 4 licensed abstraction borehole within 2 km radius
Licence Numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0177 (2 boreholes) 2. 28/39/42/0071 (1 borehole) 3. 28/39/41/0081 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.15km northwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) 2. 665m northeast of the site 3. 559m south of the site Operator: 1. Trustees of the Hurlingham Club 2. Hanson Quarry Prod Europe Ltd
Mitigation required and Conclusions The drop shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 33.11mbgl therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head in Chalk is approximately 5.11m above the base of the construction.
A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the 400 days travel times of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100 mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows;
1. 109m 2. 137m 3. 80m
As a result, the shaft is not located within any of these catchment areas.
Appendix 9 - Page 9
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site Considerations Comments

3. London Borough of Wandsworth Abstracted Aquifer Unit: 1.Gravel 2. Chalk 3. Chalk Abstraction Purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports grounds/facilities- spray irrigation) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (mineral products-general use) 3. Industrial, commercial and public service (municipal grounds-make up or top up water) Abstraction Quantity (annual): 1. 15,000m3 2. 23,515m3 3. 8,000m3
Mitigation required and Conclusions
Local Authorities (LA) Unlicensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details Information pending from Hammersmith and Fulham Council No abstraction borehole within 1km radius inside Wandsworth Council Boundary borehole locations and depths There are 6 historical records of water wells: 5 deep wells and 1 shallow well within 1km radius. Depth range: 101.8 192.02m. Depth range: 6.88m. Potential impacts on surface water features The site is located approximately 400 metres south of the River Thames. The site is located approximately 65 metres from the Bell Lane Creek, a tributary of the River Wandle. The site is located behind the Flood defences and so the pathway for pollution would be through drainage to the Bell Lane Creek. Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality) No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). At See below (likely types of mitigation measures that will be required). Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23.
Appendix 9 - Page 10
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site Considerations Comments shallow depth, the shaft is located in Alluvium which is classified as a minor aquifer. Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by diaphragm wall or caissons. Likely types of mitigation measures that will be required Potential issues No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. The drop shaft to be excavated in London Clay but to below piezometric head in Chalk. Potential pressure effects. Limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer. Not applicable Confined head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer will depend on construction design. Mitigation required and Conclusions
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as the drop shaft would be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head would be approximately 5.1 metres above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer would be expected and the superficial deposits are Alluvium which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There would be limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer due to diaphragm wall or caissons. In terms of surface water resources, this site is suitable as there is no direct route for pollution to the Bell Lane Creek. Standard mitigation will be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement 23.
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Non-statutory designated wildlife sites Comments None within 2km Site is approximately 50m from the River Thames & Tidal Tributaries SMI The Bell Lane creek shore is listed as BAP priority habitat mudflats. The Tidal Thames is a London BAP habitat Mitigation required and conclusions None required Care will need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane creek. Works are unlikely to require landtake from the BAP habitats, but care will need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane creek. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required for any buildings to be affected by works, possibly including offsite provision.
BAP priority habitats
protected or otherwise notable species within the Study Area
There is a low possibility that buildings on site may be used by roosting bats. No direct impact on aquatic receptors
Potential issues Summary: This site is suitable as it would only require basic ecological surveys if selected.
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood Risk Zone Comments The site is within Flood Zone 3 defended to the 1 in 1000year flood level. There would be a potential for a breach of the defences, as such, mitigation would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to table D.2 of PPS25 Assessment of conditions for SuDS There is limited space onsite for SuDS. However, the site is a brownfield site and the superficial geology is such that an investigation into the suitability of infiltration SuDS is required. Attenuation SuDS would be a possibility. Potential issues Summary: This site is suitable as it is defended to a 1 in 1000 year flood level. There would be limited space onsite for SuDS; an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SuDS. N/A Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site.
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objective for NO2 is exceeded on major roads in vicinity of site. There are residential properties along Armoury Way (A217) and Frogmore. The nearest residential properties are around 25m from the site at Brewers House. Existing traffic issues The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A3, A217 and A3209 corridors. See existing traffic issues above. There is no data at likely access to A217 and the nearest existing data indicates existing exceedance of AQLV. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route the construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works. Additional vehicle emissions have a high potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See existing traffic issues above. Collect minimum 6 months diffusion tube data at the nearest residential receptors to the site access to A217 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hours. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Sensitive Receptors
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring
Potential issues
The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts at residential properties is moderate.
Summary: This site less is suitable. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site. Fugitive emissions of dust would have the potential to have a perceptible these properties, although these impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There would be potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas with existing poor air quality, this can be partially mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58 dB LAeq and night-time noise levels of less than 50 dB LAeq at residential properties located at Brewers House on Frogmore Lane to the south west of the site. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively low daytime and night-time noise levels due to their distance to the A217 to the south of the site. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. Sensitive Receptors There are sensitive receptors in close proximity to the south western boundary of the site. Further residential properties are located to the west at London Court and Sudlow Road and to the south on Armoury Way. Sensitive receptors to the south west on Frogmore Lane consist of 4 storey residential dwellings. These are located at a distance of approximately 20m from the south western site boundary. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including properties on Armoury Way which will be considerably affected by HGV traffic. Existing traffic issues Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west will contribute to the local noise Not applicable Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Existing sources of significant noise emissions
Not applicable
Noise Site considerations Comments climate in the area. A railway also lies close to properties on Sudlow Road. Potential issues Construction: The construction period is estimated at 2 to 3 years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm) Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site, and in particular those located on Frogmore Lane. A building will also be demolished and this will again result in an adverse noise impact on properties on Frogmore Lane and Armoury Way. The vehicle movements has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along the length Dormay Street and Armoury Road, off which a permanent access is proposed however there are a small number of residential properties along these routes. The immediate site area is fairly small and, whilst the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 80m and it is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences. Mitigation required and conclusions
Noise Site considerations Comments shaft sinking however vibration levels may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case by case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should not result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is less suitable due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Frogmore Lane. Noise from demolition activities may cause an adverse noise impact and vibration may also cause annoyance. However, the number of vehicles likely to be associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to have low noise impact as there are very few residential properties being located on Dormay Street and Armoury Way. Mitigation required and conclusions
Land quality Site Location Current Site Use Topography Field Evidence of contamination (ie, visual/olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site) Grid Reference: 525502, 174904 Site is occupied by Panorama Antennas business premises (building). Flat Ground None Observed site not accessible on visit
North: Keltbray works/Local Authority depot. East: Dormay street, beyond which lies Wentworth House (Grade II listed building) which appears to be in use as Keltbray offices. Other commercial/industrial units also line Dormay street. South: Other commercial and industrial premises adjacent to southern boundary of site, beyond which lie residential properties and a pub. West: Frogmore Road, lined on the opposite side by 3 storey residential properties (flats).
Geological and Hydro geological Information Geological Strata

1
Geology (thickness) Superficial Geology and Made Ground (7 m) London Clay (44 m) Lambeth Group (21 m) Thanet sand (11 m)
Underlying Aquifer Classes
Non-Aquifer: London Clay Minor Aquifer: River Terrace Deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sands Major Aquifer: Chalk
Groundwater Vulnerability/ Soil Classification (High/Intermediate/Low/ 2 Not Applicable) Source Protection Zone Details Surface Water Receptor
River Terrace Deposits - Minor Aquifer High Leaching Potential of Soils (U)
1
Not located in a Source Protection Zone Bell Lane Creek (65m north) River Wandle, (60m east)
Relevant Information within a 250m radius of the site Historical Potentially Contaminating Activities (based on mapping data) Onsite Dye works with tanks and works buildings, 1868-1952 Works use not specified, 1952-present Offsite Factory or works, use not specified, (adjacent southern boundary), 1959-present
Land quality Works, (10m northwest), 1965 Works, (15m west), 1951 Works, (20m east), 1964 Electrical Sub-stations, (closest located 30m west), 1951 Royal Laundry, (65m northeast), 1896 Engineering works, (70m southeast), 1976 Brewery, (80m southeast), 1896 Depot, (80m south), 1964 Timber yard, (80m south), 1951 Sugar packing (85m northwest), 1959 Potential Fuel Tanks, (closest located 95m east), 1951 Garage, (110m east), 1988 Works, (115south), 1964 Flour Mill, (120m southeast), 1896 Motor vehicles maintenance and repair, (120m east), 1989 Brewing and malting, (120m southeast), 1920-1989 Electricity works, (125m northeast), 1968 Tar works with 18 tank areas, (130m east), 1951-1952 Electricity works with electrical sub-station, (200m northeast), Flour mill, (135m north), 1896 Railways, (135m north), 1868-present Garage with potential tanks, (135m south), 1965 Wharf (transport support and cargo handling), (160m north), 1916-1976 Oil, petroleum and gas refining and storage, (170m northeast), 1987 Timber Yard, (170m northeast), 1896 Engineering works, (170m southwest), 1965 Gas works, (170m east), 1952-1980 Smithy works, (180m southwest), 1896 Garage, (180m southwest), 1965 Electricity works, (180m east), 1916 Engineering works with potential tanks, (180m southwest), 1951 Works, (200m north), 1896 Smithy works, (200m southeast), 1896 Cement works and electrical sub-station, (200m northeast), 1973 Gas manufacture and distribution, (210m northeast), 18731949 Works, (210m east), 1964 Factory or works, use not specified, (220m northwest), 19161987 Major food processing, (225m northwest), 1916-1920 Pollution Incidents to controlled waters Two incidents: Unknown sewage, significant incident, (75m southeast Appendix 9 - Page 19
Land quality within River Wandle) Unknown chemicals, minor incident, (195m south Wandsworth High Street) Landfill Sites Other Waste Sites Historical landfill site, ref EAHLD11043, 240m north, no data Three registered waste transfer sites: Special waste transfer station (inert/asbestos), very small (less than 10,000 t/year) since 6/2/1995, (75m northwest). Listed as operational. Metal, film and photo waste treatment, very small (less than 10,000 t/year), active, (50m south). Household, commercial and industrial inert waste transfer station, medium (25,000 to 75,000 t/year), inactive, (190m northwest). Registered Radioactive Substances Fuel Stations/Depots Contemporary Trade Directory Entries None One former petrol station, Armoury Way, Wandsworth, (185m east) Fifteen: Telecommunication, equipment and system, active, (1m south) Commercial cleaning service, inactive, (60 northeast) Waste disposal service, inactive, (60m northeast) Car dealer-used, inactive, (45m south) Scrap metal merchant, inactive, (55m south) Gas suppliers, inactive, (180m northeast) Domestic cleaning service, active, (125m southwest) Refrigeration equipment retail, active, (205m northeast) Distributions services, active, (240m northwest) Garage services, active, (200m northeast) Commercial vehicles servicing, repairs, parts and accessories, inactive, (200m northeast) Fireplace and mantelpieces, active, (155m southwest) Car dealers, inactive, (145m south) Car dealers, active, (165m southwest) Classic car specialist, inactive, (205m southwest) Site Classification Based on Above Information Activity Potential Site Contaminants derived from surface sources (e.g. contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Dye works Distance and Direction to Site 1) Onsite and directly adjacent to site Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH
2) Onsite and adjacent to site
2) Metals, Nitrate, Sulphate, Phenols, TPH, Solvents
Land quality 3) Works Potential Site Contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site 1) Works 3) Onsite 1) Adjacent to site 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs 1) Metals, TPH, PAHs 2) PCBs
2) Electrical substations 3) Laundry Works
2) 30m west
3) 65m northeast
3) Metals, Sulphate, TPHs, Solvents
Potential Contamination Pathways to Site (Conceptual Site Model)

3
Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 Source 2: D6, E1, F7 Category 3 Assessed as High Risk
Contamination Category Summary:
The site is less suitable because of the high potential that contamination has occurred from historic activities onsite. These include a dye works and a second unspecified works which have the potential to impact on soils and shallow groundwater. Additionally, migration from offsite activities may have occurred through the shallow ground water to beneath the site. The contamination would have the potential to impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/ vapour inhalation exposure pathways. Additionally, the potential exists for contamination of surface water receptors to occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (i.e. River Terrace Gravel) aquifer. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathwayreceptors.
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report C07AF: Offices, Dormay Street

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Site Suitability Report C07AF: Offices, Dormay Street

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Site Suitability Report C07AF: Offices, Dormay Street

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Spring 2010

Site Suitability Report C07AF

100-RG-PNC-C07AF-900001 | Spring 2010

Site Suitability Report C07AF

SITE SUITABILITY REPORT C07AF

SITE INFORMATION 2.1 2.2 Site and surroundings Type of site

9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF

4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF

5.4 5.4.1 6 6.1 6.1.1

Site Suitability Report C07AF

6.3.5 6.3.6 6.3.7 6.3.8 6.3.9

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF

7.6 7.6.1 7.7 7.7.1

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF

9.3 9.3.1 9.3.2

9.4.4 9.4.5 9.5 9.5.1 9.5.2 9.5.3

Site Suitability Report C07AF

9.7 9.7.1 10 10.1

Site Suitability Report C07AF

Site Suitability Report C07AF - Appendices

Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 1

APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 1

Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 1

Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 2

APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN

CSO (Directly Controlled)

CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO

200 Metres 300 400

Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00973 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid

Thames Water Utilities

APPENDIX 2 C07AF SITE SITE LOCATION PLAN

Site Suitability Report C07AF Appendix 3

APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS

Bell Lane Cree

Mean High Wate

CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO

Industrial Employment Areas 2008 Site Allocations Document Sites

Mean High Water

r Mean Hig h Wate

The Roche School

Child Guida nce Unit

All Saints' Church

m il dle Mid ous e H

Car Park El Sub Sta

Horse Exercise Area

Mixed Use Areas

Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-01105 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid 13

Salvation Army The Citadel

Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, London W2 1AF

APPENDIX 3A C07AF SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN