Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Rectable, Inc. V Becton Dickenson, Inc. Jury Verdict

    Uploaded by

    pcvanslyke
    Jury Verict form in case tried in the Eastern District of Texas in 2013 resulting in a verdict of $113,009 in favor of Retractable for claims of attempt to monopolize the safety syringe market by making false marketing statements about Becton's own product and Retractible's competitive product. This case is rare for finding a false advertising ground for an antitrust violation of attempt to monopolize a market under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Rectable, Inc. V Becton Dickenson, Inc. Jury Verdict

    Uploaded by

    pcvanslyke
    9 views5 pages
    Jury Verict form in case tried in the Eastern District of Texas in 2013 resulting in a verdict of $113,009 in favor of Retractable for claims of attempt to monopolize the safety syringe market by making false marketing statements about Becton's own product and Retractible's competitive product. This case is rare for finding a false advertising ground for an antitrust violation of attempt to monopolize a market under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

    Original Title

    Rectable, Inc. v Becton Dickenson, Inc. Jury Verdict

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jury Verict form in case tried in the Eastern District of Texas in 2013 resulting in a verdict of $113,009 in favor of Retractable for claims of attempt to monopolize the safety syringe market by making false marketing statements about Becton's own product and Retractible's competitive product. This case is rare for finding a false advertising ground for an antitrust violation of attempt to monopolize a market under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views5 pages

    Rectable, Inc. V Becton Dickenson, Inc. Jury Verdict

    Uploaded by

    pcvanslyke
    Jury Verict form in case tried in the Eastern District of Texas in 2013 resulting in a verdict of $113,009 in favor of Retractable for claims of attempt to monopolize the safety syringe market by making false marketing statements about Becton's own product and Retractible's competitive product. This case is rare for finding a false advertising ground for an antitrust violation of attempt to monopolize a market under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 577 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 24160

    Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 577 Filed 09/19/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 24161

    Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 577 Filed 09/19/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 24162

    Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 577 Filed 09/19/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 24163

    Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 577 Filed 09/19/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 24164

    You might also like