TERPRET

AND

81RECT

ARCHITECTURE

SUT

RATH~R

TO

PROVIDE

SOME

ORDER,

SOME

PO!NT

Ot~

353

REFERENCE

FROM

WHICH

AN

UNDERSTANDING

OF

THE

WORK

MAY
AND

SE

EVOLVED.

THEOPY
20TH

SHOULD

ABONDON

80TH

Ti1,;

ill.TORICAL

19TH

CENTlJRY

TRADITION

THE

POLEI'-'CAL

'-:EN-

TUf7Y

TRADITION.

IT

i.I S T

:3 OM E ri OW E ~ T " 8 L I 5 ~I

S Y 5 T E II,;

OF

P r10 R I T I E S

8" 5 E [,

ON

LOCIC."L

C(J"'SISrL'~CY

IF

IT

IS

TO

HAVE

ANY

VALID'TY.,

THEORY

IN

SHORT.

SHOULC

fJE

EVOLvru

FOR

Tt'[

UN~Jt.::HSTAI'JIIING

OF

PRINCIILES

AND

1:0T

FOP

THE

CODIFYING

OF

PRINC'~

II'LCS.

IT

I~ ANr

A CLARiFICATION I
;',1 T t;

OF OFT

FUNDAMENTALf>, h E ,E

MHl

IT

PPOVIDES

A E~!'~.

L,"\(;UAGE

FO"'.

TlIF.:

c I S C j S S ION

H P Po E T f.. T ION

FUN o Ai." E i'! T A L S

TI)

T;

IS

TI-l E OF-Y S Ho U L o

NOT

i~E

cow::

I L'L.r(I~.'

,",',

A St:T

PIECE,

A NEATLY

,RAP E[1 PACKAGF.

OU1'

RATt1"::R

AS

A C0f.l-

flNUOUSLY

AP,'LI('

MH,

uPEi\I-Er~liED

METHOL;OL)GY.

Tu r s
OF

Dj::;SLI

TATIJN

HAS

LIMITED

ITSELF

TO

ONLY

ONE

P'1ASE

OF

THE

TOf"L

PROBLEM,

THAT

THE

rOP"AL

MA1JlFL-ST"rIONS

OF

CONCEPTUAl;,

ID''::.\5,

11,1 DOING

SO

IT

HA~)

lEO

TO

DEVCLOI

MJ

ARGurJ;::,.T

IN

l:fITIUNAL

AND

LOGICAL

Yt:HMS~

IT

HAS

TRIED

TO

LXCLuO~

METIIPWf,;ICAL

s rt

.x

i ou s

AND

PARTICULAR

IIE~THE:TIG

Plf::FEf1E.NCES,

AND

IT

H~S

NOT

TRiED

TO

EXPLI\I,~

Ti1E

UNDI5CfllMINATED

PREJUDICES

A;n

HALF

~NALY5EO

PREDILECTION!:

THAT

ARE

APPARE~T

IN

~OD[RN

CRITICISM.

IT

MAKES

NO

PRCTENSIONS

TU

BEING

co~-

ILETE

WUfi'K,

IN

F/ICT

IT

;5

SOhAETHliIIG

THAT

CA1~ ONLY

~CI'ITINUE

TO

flEV[LOr-

..

THI:;

DISSERTATION,

TtiF

'EFo)RE,

SHOULD

BE

COi.!,j[)ERED

O',lY

AS

OCi,IONST"1ATING

II

METHor

~ AS

A fuS.s18U::

WAY OF

APPROACH

TO

AN

AiClilTCCTurU\L

f'R08LEW:,

MJii

IS

0\5

SUCH

OPEN-ENDE:D.

l r, r.
A HASIS

r s. :ENSC,

IT

CAN

i;;\VE

NO

CJN':'LUSIONS

I\S

ITS

111M I~

LIMITED

TO

PROVIDING

~OH

ClARIFtCATIO~

OF

CO~CEPTUAL

THOUGHT.