Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Binding Kinetics
Binding Kinetics
Lecture 10
Ligand Binding
Consider ligand A binding to macromolecule P:
A + P AP
Equilibrium constant is defined as:
[1]
Kd =
[ P ][ A] [ PA]
[2]
(note that Kd is often referred wrongly as binding constant: Kb = 1/Kd) define fractional occupancy (moles of ligand mole of macromolecule) r:
r=
[!]
r=
[ A] K d + [ A]
["]
18722 220!doc
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
binding isotherm
1#2 1 $#& $#% $#" $#2 $ $ ' 1$ [A] 1' 2$ 2' (d)1 (d)' (d)' (d)1$
*ote that although the isotherm has the concentration for free ligand [A] as well as bound ligand ([+]bound in r ) you ha,e to measure only one (bound or free) because conser'ation o( mass the total ligand [A]total = [A]+[PA] (and total macromolecule [P]total = [P]+[PA])# -easure the concentrations of free or bound ligand by ,ariety of methods: chromatography. equilibrium dialysis. ultrafiltration. spectroscopy#
Independent
A + P A1 P + A2 P +.......
identical sites: +11)+21 or different sites: +11+21 [']
18722 220!doc
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
Identical sites
site 1
site 2 macromolecule
all sites are independent and identical so that total number of sites is n[P]total rather than [P]total :
[ A] K d + [ A]
[%]
Scatchard plot
plot the ratio of r/[A] ,ersus r:
r n r = [ A] K d K d
[&]
2or identical binding this results in a linear plot# 3e,iation from linearity implies non4identical sites#
r/[A]
Di erent sites
to be ,ery general: each class of sites with different Kdi can ha,e ni identical sites
18722 220!doc
"
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
site class 1
site class 2
macromolecule
/he binding isotherm is a sum of the single binding isotherms. each corresponding to different class of sites:
r = r1 + r2 +..... =
n1 [ A] n2 [ A] + +........ K d ,1 + [ A] K d ,2 + [ A]
[5]
!ooperati"it#
6inding to one site on a molecule modulates binding of another# 2or strong cooperati,ity. binding of one ligand triggers binding to n sites:
nA + P An P
[7]
Kd =
[ P ][ A] n [ An P ]
n [ PAn ] n[ A] =n = [ P] + [ PAn ] K d + [ A] n
[1$]
[ A] r = bound [ P] total
[11]
or measure the ratio of filled sites $ %$=r/n& to the unfilled sites (1'$):
Y r [ A] = = 1Y n r Kd
)*ill+s e,uation)
[12]
18722 220!doc
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
(ill)s Plot
1lot log%$/%1'$& "* log[A]. the slope is n8 an intercept is 1/Kd#
log [+]
Kinetics
/ime course of reaction. 9inetics gi,e information about the rates rather than equilibria# :f course rates and equilibria are related Keg = .+1/.'1. howe,er the ratio of rates tells us nothing about the ,alue of each rate i#e# is it fast or is it slow# /wo sorts of 9inetics are usually considered:
stead#'state: in which the forward flu0 ) bac9ward flu0 resulting in no change of concentration8
steady-state (Michaelis-Menten)
E + S X E + P
k 1 k 2 k1 k2
[1!]
for a reaction with an intermediate / the rate of intermediate;s production is equal to that of its disappearance:
d[ X ] = ( k 1 + k 2 ) [ X ] k1 [ E ][ S ] k 2 [ E ][ P ] = 0 dt
[1"]
/he rates of substrate disappearance and the appearance of the product are identical:
18722 220!doc "#$#0$ 11%08 &"#P" -
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
d [ S ] d [ P] = = k 1 [ E ][ S ] k 1 [ X ] dt dt
[1']
[ E ] = [ E ] +[ X ] [ S ] = [ S ] + [ P]
o o
[1%]
[ P] = 0
[15]
thus the initial ,elocity " can be sol,ed since we ha,e fi,e equations with " un9nowns (concentrations of E. <. =. 1)
v=
d[ S] Vmax [ S ] = dt [ S ] + K Michaelis
[1&]
(dirty shortcut: reali>e that initial ,elocity is a ma0imum ,elocity reduced by the partial en>yme occupancy. i#e#:
v = rVmax
then substitute " for r in the equation for Langmuir isotherm#) t0rno"er
[1&]
k cat =
Vmax Eo
[17]
non'stead# state
<teady4state appro0imation is not always applicable. for general reaction:
18722 220!doc
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
E + S X1
k 1
k1
[2$]
d[ E ] d[ S ] d X 1 = = = k 1 [ E ][ S ] k 1 X 1 dt dt dt
[ ]
[ ]
[21]
[ E ] = [ E ] +[ X ] [ S ] = [ S] +[ X ]
o 1 o 1
[22]
/he differential (rate) equation can be sol,ed but it is a mess since the equation is non4linear (the rate depends on product of [E] and [<]). better appro0imate that < o ?? Eo so that concentration of substrate ne,er changes (pse0do' irst order appro1imation ):
d X1 dt
[ ] =k
( [ E ] [ X ] )[ S ] k [ X ]
o 1 o 1 1
[2!]
/his equation is a linear in /1 and it can be integrated to gi,e the concentration of /1 as function of time:
ln
[ E ] [ E
o
[ E ] [ E equilibrium
equilibrium
] = ( k [ S ] + k )t ]
1 o 1
[2"]
E + S X1 X 2
k 1 k 2
k1
k2
[2']
[ E ] = [ E] +[ X ] +[ X ] [ S ] = [ S] +[ X ] +[ X ]
o 1 2 o 1 2
[2%]
18722 220!doc
Peter Fajer
Lecture 10
d[ E ] = k 1 [ E ][ S ] k 1 X 1 dt
[ ]
[25]
d X2 dt
[ ] =k
[ X ] k [ X ]
2 2 1
[2&]
+t this point you are ad,ised to gi,e up# @hat you ha,e is the set of simultaneous/ non0linear di((erential e,uations which e,en your grandma can;t sol,e# 6ill Aates to the rescue8 integrate the set using a 1C and any mathematical pac9age with n0merical integration routines e#g# -athcad. -athematica. -atlab#
18722 220!doc