Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Methodology Checklist 1: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Uploaded by

    Novita Eka Fitriani
    12 views1 page
    This document provides a methodology checklist for systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing studies. It addresses whether the paper is a systematic review/meta-analysis and relevant to the key question. It then evaluates whether the review has a clear focused question, descriptive methodology, sufficiently rigorous literature search, assessment of study quality, and sufficient study similarities to reasonably combine results. The checklist rates these elements as well covered, adequately addressed, or poorly addressed. It concludes by summarizing the authors' conclusions and allowing comments on assessing how well the study was conducted and answers the key question.

    Original Description:

    check list

    Original Title

    Sistemic Review

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a methodology checklist for systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing studies. It addresses whether the paper is a systematic review/meta-analysis and relevant to the key question. It then evaluates whether the review has a clear focused question, descriptive methodology, sufficiently rigorous literature search, assessment of study quality, and sufficient study similarities to reasonably combine results. The checklist rates these elements as well covered, adequately addressed, or poorly addressed. It concludes by summarizing the authors' conclusions and allowing comments on assessing how well the study was conducted and answers the key question.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    12 views1 page

    Methodology Checklist 1: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Uploaded by

    Novita Eka Fitriani
    This document provides a methodology checklist for systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing studies. It addresses whether the paper is a systematic review/meta-analysis and relevant to the key question. It then evaluates whether the review has a clear focused question, descriptive methodology, sufficiently rigorous literature search, assessment of study quality, and sufficient study similarities to reasonably combine results. The checklist rates these elements as well covered, adequately addressed, or poorly addressed. It concludes by summarizing the authors' conclusions and allowing comments on assessing how well the study was conducted and answers the key question.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Methodology Checklist 1: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

    SIGN Study identification (Include author, title, year of publication, journal title, pages ) Guideline topic: Before completing this checklist, consider: 1. Is the paper a systematic review or meta-analysis? IF NO R ! "# $give reason %elow&. IF ' ( "ON#IN) . *. Is the paper relevant to key +,estion? -nalyse ,sing .I"O $.atient or .op,lation Intervention "omparison O,tcome&. IF NO R ! "# $give reason %elow&. IF ' ( complete the checklist. Reason /or re0ection: 1. .aper not a systematic review1meta-analysis +,estion Key Question No:

    2 2
    $please speci/y&:

    *. .aper not relevant to key

    3. Other reason

    Checklist completed by:

    SECTION 1: INTERN ! " !I#IT$


    In a well conducted systematic review 1.1 The study add esses an app op iate and clea ly focused !uestion. In this study this criterion is::
    "ell co#e ed $de!uately add essed %oo ly add essed "ell co#e ed $de!uately add essed %oo ly add essed "ell co#e ed $de!uately add essed %oo ly add essed "ell co#e ed $de!uately add essed %oo ly add essed "ell co#e ed $de!uately add essed %oo ly add essed Not add essed Not epo ted Not applicable Not add essed Not epo ted Not applicable Not add essed Not epo ted Not applicable Not add essed Not epo ted Not applicable Not add essed Not epo ted Not applicable

    1.&

    $ desc iption of the methodolo'y used is included.

    1.(

    The lite atu e sea ch is sufficiently i'o ous to identify all the ele#ant studies.

    1.)

    Study !uality is assessed and taken into account.

    1.*

    The e a e enou'h simila ities bet+een the studies selected to make combinin' them easonable.

    SECTION %: O"ER !! SSESSMENT O& T'E ST(#$ &.1 &.& ,o+ +ell +as the study done to minimise biasCode ++, +, or Notes) Summa ise the autho s conclusions. $dd any comments on you o+n assessment of the study. and the e/tent to +hich it ans+e s you !uestion.

    4 (cottish Intercollegiate 5,idelines Network, 6arch *778

    You might also like